Advertisement

In-Vehicle Information System Used in Complex and Low Traffic Situations: Impact on Driving Performance and Attitude

  • Ing-Marie Jonsson
  • Fang Chen
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4555)

Abstract

This paper describes a study where drivers’ responses to an in-vehicle information system were tested in high and low density traffic. There were 17 participants in a study that was run using a driving simulator. Data was gathered for a comparison of how drivers react to an in-vehicle information system in low density traffic, complex traffic, and without system. Participants were also asked for their subjective evaluation of trust of the system and how they perceived it influenced their driving performance. Results show gender differences for both driving performance and attitude.

Keywords

Driving simulator traffic density in-vehicle system cognitive load trust driving performance 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Angell, L., et al.: The Driver Workload Metrics Project. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hanowski, R.J., et al.: Driver responses to unexpected situations when using an in-vehicle information system, in Development of human factors guidelines for advanced traveler information systems and commercial vehicle operations, Cener for Transportation Research, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University: Blacksburg, VA (1997)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lee, J.D., et al.: Design alternatives for in-vehicle information displays: Message style, modality, location, in Development of human factors guidelines for advanced traveler information systems and commercial vehicle operations. Federal Highway Administration, Washington DC (1996)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Paas, F., van Merrienboer, J.: Instructional control of cognitive load in the training of complex cognitive tasks. Educational Psychology Review 6, 51–71 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Paas, F., van Merrienboer, J.: Measurment of cognitive load in instructional research. Perceptual and Motor Skills 79, 419–430 (1994)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sweller, J., van Merrienboer, J., Paas, F.: Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review 10, 251–296 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mayer, R., et al.: When less is more: Meaningful learning from visual and verbal summaries of science textbook lessons. Journal of Educational Pshychology 88, 64–73 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mayer, R., Chandler, P.: When learning is just a click away: Does simple user interaction foster deeper understanding of multimedia messages? Journal of Educational Psychology 93, 390–397 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mayer, R., Moreno, R.: Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist 38, 43–52 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rinalducci, E.J., Mouloua, M., Smither, J.: Cognitive and perceptual factors in aging and driving performance, F.D.o. Transportation, Editor. Department of Psychology, University of Florida, Orlando, pp. 1–26 (2003)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Brouwer, W.H.: Older Drivers and Attentional Demands: Consequences for Human Factors Research. In: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society-Europe, Chapter on Aging and Human Factors, Soesterberg, Netherlands (1993)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rabbitt, P.: An age-decrement in the ability to ignore irrelevant information. Journal of Gerontology 20, 233–238 (1965)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jonsson, I.-M., Zajicek, M.: Selecting the voice for an In-car information system for older adults. In: Human Computer Interaction International 2005, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA (2005)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jonsson, I.-M., et al.: Thank you I did not see that: In-car Speech-Based Information Systems for Older Adults. In: Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM Press, Portland, Oregon, USA (2005)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Likert, R.: A Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes. Archives of Psychology 40 (1932)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rubin, R.B., Palmgreen, P., Sypher, H.E.: Communication Research Measures: A Sourcebook, p. 400. Guilford Press, New York (1994)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nass, C., et al.: Improving Automotive Safety by Pairing Driver Emotion and Car Voice Emotion. In: CHI 2005 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, ACM Press, New York, NY (2005)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jonsson, I.-M., et al.: Don’t blame me I am only the Driver: Impact of Blame Attribution on Attitudes and Attention to Driving Task. In: CHI 2004 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, Vienna, Austria (2004)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jonsson, I.M., et al.: Got Info? Examining the Consequences of Inaccurate Information Systems. In: International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training, and Vehicle Design, Rockport, Maine (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ing-Marie Jonsson
    • 1
  • Fang Chen
    • 2
  1. 1.Ansima Inc., Los Gatos, CA 95033USA
  2. 2.Interaction Design Group, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, SE-412 96 GöteborgSweden

Personalised recommendations