Advertisement

An Accessible and Usable Soft Keyboard

  • Alexandros Mourouzis
  • Evangelos Boutsakis
  • Stavroula Ntoa
  • Margherita Antona
  • Constantine Stephanidis
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4555)

Abstract

AUK is a 3x3 multi-tier onscreen keyboard. It supports various entry modes, including 1 to 10-key and joystick modes, allowing text entry with a remarkable range of devices. This paper presents the menu structure of AUK, the alternative entry modes, and several layouts for novice, moderate and expert users. The potential of AUK, as a text entry solution both for disabled and able-bodied users, is discussed. Overall, the work presented here is considered as a contribution to Universal Access and towards ambient text entry.

Keywords

Text entry soft keyboard Universal Access Ambient Intelligence 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Isokoski, P.: Manual Text Input: Experiments, Models, and Systems (PhD Thesis). University of Tampere, Tampere Finland (2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sandnes, F.E., Thorkildssen, H.W., Arvei, A., Buverud, J.O.: Techniques for fast and easy mobile text-entry with three-keys. In: Proc. of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2004), pp. 1–10 (January 05-08, 2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    MacKenzie, I.S., Soukoreff, R.W.: Text Entry for Mobile Computing: Models and Methods, Theory and Practice. Human-Computer interaction 17, 147–198 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Stephanidis, C., et al.: Toward an Information Society for All:HCI challenges and R&D recommendations. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 11(1), 1–28 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Emiliani, P.L., Stephanidis, C.: Universal access to ambient intelligence environments: Opportunities and challenges for people with disabilities. IBM Systems Journal 44(3), 605–619 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Edwards, A.D.N.: Extra-Ordinary Human-Computer Interaction: Interfaces for Users with Disabilities. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1995) ISBN 0-521-43413-0Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Oniszczak, A., MacKenzie, I.S.: A comparison of Two Input Methods for Keypads on Mobile Devices. In: Proc. of NordiCHI 2004, Tampere Finland, pp. 101–104 (October 23-27, 2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    MacKenzie, I.S.: KSPC (Keystrokes per Character) as a Characteristic of Text Entry Techniques. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices, pp. 195–210. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Johansen, A.S., Hansen, J.P.: Augmentative and alternative communication: the future of text on the move. International Journal of UAIS 5, 125–149 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kölsch, M., Turk, M.: Keyboards without Keyboards: A Survey of Virtual Keyboards. In: Sensing and Input for Media-centric Systems, SIMS 2002 (2002)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhai, S., Hunter, M., Smith, B.A.: Performance Optimization of Virtual Keyboards. Human-Computer Interaction 17, 89–129 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mourouzis, A., Ntoa, S., Boutsakis, E., Kartakis, G., Stephanidis, C.: Expert-based assessment of the ARGO Web browser for people with disability. In: Proc. of 8th European Conference for the Advancement of Assistive Technology in Europe (AAATE 2005), September 6-9, 2005, pp. 767–771. Lille, France (2005)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pavlovych, A., Stuerzlinger, W.: Less-Tap: A Fast and Easy-to-learn Text Input Technique for Phones. In: Proc. of Graphics Interfaces, pp. 319–326 (2003)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Soukoreff, R.W., MacKenzie, I.S.: Input-based language modelling in the design of high performance text input techniques. In: Proc.of Graphifcs Interface, pp. 89–96 (2003)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hansen, J.P., Johansen, A.S., Hansen, D.W., Itoh, K., Mashino, S.: Command Without a Click: Dwell Time Typing by Mouse and Gaze Selections. In: Proc. of INTERACT 2003, pp. 121–128 (2003)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Norman, D.A., Fisher, D.: Why alphabetic keyboards are not easy to use: Keyboard layout doesn’t much matter. Human Factors 24(5), 509–519 (1982)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bellman, T., MacKenzie, I.S.: A probabilistic character layout strategy for mobile text entry. In: Proc. Graphics Interface 1998, pp. 168–176 (1998)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    MacKenzie, I.S., Kober, H., Smith, D., Jones, T., Skepner, E.: LetterWise: Prefix-based disambiguation for mobile text input. In: Proc.of the ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST 2001), pp. 111–120 (2001)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Garay-Vitoria, N., Abascal, J.: Text Prediction Systems: A survey. International Journal on Universal Access in the Information Society (UAIS) 4(3), 188–203 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Soukoreff, R.W., MacKenzie, I.S.: Metrics for text entry research: An evaluation of MSD and KSPC, and a new unified error metric. In: Proc.of CHI 2003, pp. 113–120 (2003)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alexandros Mourouzis
    • 1
  • Evangelos Boutsakis
    • 1
  • Stavroula Ntoa
    • 1
  • Margherita Antona
    • 1
  • Constantine Stephanidis
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Foundation for Research and Technology – Hellas (FORTH), Institute of Computer Science, Heraklion, GR-70013Greece
  2. 2.University of Crete, Department of Computer Science 

Personalised recommendations