Using Design Critique as Research to Link Sustainability and Interactive Technologies

  • Eli Blevis
  • Youn-kyung Lim
  • David Roedl
  • Erik Stolterman
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4564)

Abstract

This paper echoes and points to work we have presented elsewhere on establishing the links between issues of sustainability and interaction design. The significant contribution of this paper is a description of the use of design critique as a research method and an argument for its importance to HCI researchers, especially with respect to very complex design contexts—the link between sustainability issues and interaction design research and practice, in particular.

Keywords

Design critique design research sustainable interaction design research methods design ethics and values value sensitive design social context of interaction design 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Alexander, C.: The Nature of Order. vol. II. The Center for Environmental Structure. Berkeley, CA (2002)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Blevis, E.: Sustainable Interaction Design: Invention & Disposal, Renewal & Reuse. In: Proc.of CHI 2007, ACM Press, New York, NY (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Blevis, E.: Advancing sustainable interaction design: two perspectives on material effects. Design Philosophy Papers #04/2006 (2006) Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bhuie, A., Ogunseitan, O., Saphores, J., Shapiro, A.: Environmental and economic trade-offs in consumer electronic products recycling: a case study of cell phones and computers. In: IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment, pp. 74–79 (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Coroama, V., Kostakos, V., Magerkurth, C., de Vallejo, I.: UbiSoc 2005: first international workshop on social implications of ubiquitous computing. In: Ext. Abs. of CHI 2005, pp. 2111–2112. ACM Press, New York, NY (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cross, N.: Designerly ways of knowing: design discipline versus design science. Design Issues 17(3), 49–55 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dourish, P.: Implications for design. In: Proc. of CHI 2006, pp. 541–550. ACM Press, New York, NY (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fallman, D.: Designing design: design-oriented human-computer interaction. In: Proc. of CHI 2003, pp. 225–232. ACM Press, New York (2003)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Friedman, B., Kahn, P., Borning, A.: Value sensitive design and information systems. In: Zhang, P., Galletta, D. (eds.) Human-Computer Interaction and Management Information Systems: Foundations. M.E. Sharpe, New York, pp. 348–372 (2006)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Friedman, B.: Value sensitive design, pp. 76–774. Berkshire Publishing, Great Barrington, MA (2004)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Friedman, B., Kahn Jr., P.: Human values, ethics, and design. In: Jacko, J., Sears, A. (eds.) The human-computer interaction handbook, pp. 1177–1201. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ (2003)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Friedman, B.: Human Values and the Design of Computer Technology. CSLI Press, Stanford, CA (1997)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fry, T.: A New Design Philosophy: An Introduction to Defuturing. NSWU Press, New South Wales, Australia (1999)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jain, R., Wullert, J.: Challenges: environmental design for pervasive computing systems. In: Proc. of the 8th Annual international Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, pp. 263–270. ACM Press, New York, NY (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Liu, C.M., Donath, J.S.: Urbanhermes: social signaling with electronic fashion. In: Proc. of CHI 2006, ACM Press, New York, NY (2006)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Löwgren, J., Stolterman, E.: Thoughtful Interaction Design. MIT Press, Cambridge (2004)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mankoff, J., Blevis, E., Borning, A., Friedman, B., Fussell, S., Hasbrouk, J., Sengers, P., Woodruf, A.: Sustainability and interaction (SIG). In: Ext. Abs. of CHI 2007, ACM Press, New York, NY (2007)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mankoff, J., Matthews, D., Fussell, S.R., Johnson, M.: Leveraging social networks to motivate individuals to reduce their ecological footprints. In: Proc. of HICSS (2007)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Makelberge, N.: Computing against the grain. Design Philosophy Papers. #04/2003 (2003)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Menzel, P.: Material World: A Global Family Portrait. Sierra Club Books, San Franciso, CA (1994)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nardi, B.A., O’Day, V.L.: Information Ecologies: Using Technology with Heart. MIT Press, Cambridge (1999)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nardi, B.A., et al.: (2003) A social ecology of wireless technology by Critical Friends of Technology. First Monday, vol. 8(8) (August 2003)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nelson, H., Stolterman, E.: The Design Way—Intentional Change in an Unpredictable World. Educational Technology Publications, New Jersey (2003)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Norman, D.: Emotion and design: attractive things work better. Interactions Magazine ix(4), 36–42 (2002)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Norman, D.: Affordances, conventions, and design. Interactions, 38–43 (May 1999)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Norman, D.: The Invisible Computer: Why Good Products Can Fail, the Personal Computer Is So Complex, and Information Appliances Are the Solution. MIT Press, Cambridge (1998)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Norman, D.: The Design of Everyday Things, 2nd edn. Doubleday, New York (1990)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Papanek, V.: Design for the Real World: Human Ecology and Social Change, 2nd edn. Academy Chicago, Chicago (1985)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Reed, C., Wang, H., Blevis, E.: Recognizing individual needs and desires in the case of designing an inventory of humanity-centered, sustainability-directed concepts for time and travel. In: Proc. of DPPI 2005 Designing Pleasurable Product Interfaces. Eindhoven, NL, pp. 181–212 (2005)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Schön, D.: The Reflective Practitioner. Temple Smith, London (1983)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Stegall, N.: Designing sustainability: a philosophy for ecologically intentional design. Design Issues 22(2), 56–63 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Thackara, J.: In the Bubble: Designing for a Complex World. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (2005)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wash, R., Hemphill, L., Resnick, P.: Design decisions in the RideNow Project. In: Proc. SIGGROUP, pp. 132–135 (2005)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Willis, A.M.: Ontological designing. Design Philosophy Papers. #02/2006 (2006) Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Winograd, T., Flores, F.: Understanding Computers and Cognition: A New Foundation for Design. Addison-Wesley Inc., New York (1986)MATHGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Woolley, M.: Choreographing obsolescence - ecodesign: the pleasure/dissatisfaction cycle. In: Proc. of DPPI 2003 Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces, pp. 77–81. ACM Press, New York, NY (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J., Evenson, S.: Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI. In: Proc.of CHI 2007, ACM Press, New York, NY (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eli Blevis
    • 1
  • Youn-kyung Lim
    • 1
  • David Roedl
    • 1
  • Erik Stolterman
    • 1
  1. 1.Sustainable Interaction Design Research Group, School of Informatics, Indiana University at Bloomington, 901 East 10th Street, Bloomington IN 47408USA

Personalised recommendations