Advertisement

Augmented Metacognition Addressing Dynamic Allocation of Tasks Requiring Visual Attention

  • Tibor Bosse
  • Willem van Doesburg
  • Peter-Paul van Maanen
  • Jan Treur
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4565)

Abstract

This paper discusses the use of cognitive models as augmented metacognition on task allocation for tasks requiring visual attention. In the domain of naval warfare, the complex and dynamic nature of the environment makes that one has to deal with a large number of tasks in parallel. Therefore, humans are often supported by software agents that take over part of these tasks. However, a problem is how to determine an appropriate allocation of tasks. Due to the rapidly changing environment, such a work division cannot be fixed beforehand: dynamic task allocation at runtime is needed. Unfortunately, in alarming situations the human does not have the time for this coordination. Therefore system-triggered dynamic task allocation is desirable. The paper discusses the possibilities of such a system for tasks requiring visual attention.

Keywords

Visual attention cognitive modeling augmented metacognition 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bainbridge, L.: Ironies of automation. Automatica 19, 775–779 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bosse, T., van Maanen, P.-P., Treur, J.: A Cognitive Model for Visual Attention and its Application. In: Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE/WIC/ACM Int. Conf. on Intelligent Agent Technology (IAT-2006), IEEE Computer Society Press, Hong Kong (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Campbell, G., Cannon-Bowers, J., Glenn, F., Zachary, W., Laughery, R., Klein, G.: Dynamic function allocation in the SC-21 Manning Initiative Program, Naval Air Warfare Center Training Systems Division, Orlando, SC-21/ONRS&T Manning Affordability Initiative (1997)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Clamann, M.P., Wright, M.C., Kaber, D.B.: Comparison of performance effects of adaptive automation applied to various stages of human-machine system information processing. In: Proceedings of the 46th Ann. Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Soc. pp. 342–346 (2002)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Green, D., Swets, J.: Signal detection: theory and psychophysics. Wiley, New York (1966)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Horvitz, E., Pavel, M., Schmorrow, D.D.: Foundations of Augmented Cognition. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC (2001)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Inagaki, T.: Adaptive automation: Sharing and trading of control. Handbook of Cognitive Task Design, 147–169 (2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kaber, D.B., Endsley, M.R.: The effects of level of automation and adaptive automation on human performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 5(2), 113–153 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Maes, P., Nardi, D.: Meta-level Architectures and Reflection, North-Holland, Amsterdam (1988)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schmorrow, D.D., Kruse, A.A.: Augmented Cognition. In: Bainbridge, W.S. (ed.) Berkshire Encyclopedia of Human-Computer Interaction. Great Barrington, MA:  Berkshire Publishing Group, pp. 54–99 (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tibor Bosse
    • 1
  • Willem van Doesburg
    • 2
  • Peter-Paul van Maanen
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jan Treur
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Artificial Intelligence, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1081a, 1081HV AmsterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.TNO Human Factors, P.O.Box 23, 3769ZG SoesterbergThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations