Case-Based Reasoning for Image Segmentation by Watershed Transformation

  • M. Frucci
  • P. Perner
  • G. Sanniti di Baja
Part of the Studies in Computational Intelligence book series (SCI, volume 73)

Summary

This chapter introduces a novel image-segmentation scheme based on case-based reasoning. Image segmentation is aimed at dividing an image into a number of different regions in such a way that each region is homogeneous with respect to a given property, but the union of any two adjacent regions is not. To reach this goal, a number of different approaches have been suggested in the literature, among which we consider here watershed-based segmentation. The basic idea of this segmentation scheme is to identify in the gray-level image a suitable set of seeds from which to perform a growing process. The growing process groups to each seed all pixels that are closer to that seed more than to any other seed, provided that a certain homogeneity condition is satisfied. Since any segmentation method includes some parameters, whose values depend on the image characteristics, CBR can be profitably used to improve the performance of the adopted segmentation method and to ensure that good segmentation results are obtained even if the segmentation method is applied to images with different characteristics. In practice, CBR will select from a case-base the cases having image characteristics similar to those of the current input image, and will apply to the current image the segmentation parameters associated to the most similar case. Image characteristics will be computed in terms of mean features on the whole image, and a proper similarity measure will be used to select in the case-base the most similar case.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    K.S. Fu, J.K. Mui, A survey on image segmentation, Pattern Recognition, 13, 1, 3–16, 1981.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    R.M. Haralick, L.G. Shapiro, Image segmentation techniques, Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, 29, 1, 100–132, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    N.R. Pal, S.K. Pal, A review on image segmentation techniques, Pattern Recognition, 26, 9, 1277–1294, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    D.L. Pham, C. Xu, J.L. Prince, Current methods in medical image segmentation, Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering, 2, 315–337, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    L. Lucchese, S.K. Mitra, Color Image Segmentation: A State-of-the-Art Survey, “Image Processing, Vision, and Pattern Recognition,” Proc. of the Indian National Science Academy (INSA-A), New Delhi, India, Vol. 67 A, No. 2, 207–221, 2001.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    H.D. Cheng, X.H. Jiang, Y. Sun, J. Wang, Color image segmentation: advances and prospects, Pattern Recognition, 34, 2259–2281, 2001.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. Freixenet, X. Muñoz, D. Raba, J. Martí, X. Cufí, Yet Another Survey on Image Segmentation: Region and Boundary Information Integration, Proc. 7th ECCV, LNCS 2352, Springer, 408–422, 2002.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    P.K. Sahoo, S. Soltani, A.K.C. Wong, Y.C. Chen, A survey of thresholding techniques, Comput. Vis. Graph. Im. Proc., 41, 233–260, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    A.D. Brink, Grey-level thresholding of images using a correlation criterion, Pattern Recognition Letters, 9, 5, 335–341, 1989.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    H. Luijendijk, Automatic threshold selection using histograms based on the count of 4-connected regions, Pattern Recognition Letters, 12, 4, 219–228, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    R.J. Whatmough, Automatic threshold selection from a histogram using the “exponential hull”, CVGIP: Graphical Models and Image Processing, 53, 6, 592–600, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    W.-N. Lie, An efficient threshold-evaluation algorithm for image segmentation based on spatial graylevel co-occurrences, Signal Processing, 33, 1, 121–126, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    L. Wang, J. Bai, Threshold selection by clustering gray levels of boundary Pattern Recognition Letters, 24, 12, 1983–1999, 2003.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    J. Sauvola, M. Pietikäinen, Adaptive document image binarization, Pattern Recognition, 33, 2, 225–236, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    O. Demirkaya, M.H. Asyali, Determination of image bimodality thresholds for different intensity distributions, Signal Processing: Image Communication, 19, 6, 507–516, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    M.A. Patricio and D. Maravall, A novel generalization of the gray-scale histogram and its application to the automated visual measurement and inspection of wooden Pallets, Image and Vision Computing, 2006 (in press).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    S. Chen, D. Li, Image binarization focusing on objects, Neurocomputing, 69, 16–18, 2411–2415, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    P. Perner, An architecture for a CBR image segmentation system, Journal of Engineering Application in Artificial Intelligence, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence,12-6, 749–759, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    B.J. Schachter, L.S. Davis, A. Rosenfeld, Some experiments in image segmentation by clustering of local feature values, Pattern Recognition, 11, 1, 19–28, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    M. Celenk, A color clustering technique for image segmentation, Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, 52, 2, 145–170, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    J.C. Bezdek, L.A. Hall, L.P. Clarke, Review of MR image segmentation techniques using pattern recognition”, Med. Phys., 20, 1033–1048, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    P. Schroeter, J. Bigün, Hierarchical image segmentation by multi-dimensional clustering and orientation-adaptive boundary refinement, Pattern Recognition, 28, 5, 695–709, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    D. Comaniciu, P. Meer, Robust analysis of feature spaces: color image segmentation, Proc. Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR’97) 750, 1997, 1997.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    R.P. Velthuizen, L.O. Hall, L.P. Clarke, M.L. Silbiger, An investigation of mountain method clustering for large data sets, Pattern Recognition, 30, 7, 1121–1135, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    E.J. Pauwels, G. Frederix, Finding Salient Regions in Images: Nonparametric Clustering for Image Segmentation and Grouping, Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 75, 1–2, 73–85, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    K.B. Eom, Unsupervised segmentation of spaceborne passive radar images, Pattern Recognition Letters, 20, 5, 485–494, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    J. Cutrona, N. Bonnet, M. Herbin, F. Hofer, Advances in the segmentation of multi-component microanalytical images, Ultramicroscopy, 103, 2, 141–152, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    K. Hammouche, M. Diaf, J.-G. Postaire, A clustering method based on multidimensional texture analysis, Pattern Recognition, 39, 7, 1265–1277, 2006.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    S. Filin, N. Pfeifer, Segmentation of airborne laser scanning data using a slope adaptive neighborhood, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 60, 2, 71–80, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    J.-P. Gambotto, A new approach to combining region growing and edge detection, Pattern Recognition Letters, 14, 11, 869–875, 1993.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Il Y. Kim, H. S. Yang, A systematic way for region-based image segmentation based on Markov Random Field model, Pattern Recognition Letters, 15, 10, 969–976, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    M.A. Wani, B.G. Batchelor, Edge-Region-Based Segmentation of Range Images, IEEE Trans on PAMI, 16, 3, 314–319, 1994.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    N. Ito, R. Kamekura, Y. Shimazu, T. Yokoyama, Y. Matsushita, The combination of edge detection and region extraction in nonparametric color image segmentation, Information Sciences, 92, 1–4, 277–294, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    X.M. Pardo, D. Cabello, Biomedical active segmentation guided by edge saliency, Pattern Recognition Letters, 21, s 6–7, 559–572, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    X. M. Pardo, M.J. Carreira, A. Mosquera, D. Cabello, A snake for CT image segmentation integrating region and edge information, Image and Vision Computing, 19, 7, 461–475, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    C.D. Kermad, K. Chehdi, Automatic image segmentation system through iterative edge–region co-operation, Image and Vision Computing, 20, 8, 541–555, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    X. Muñoz, J. Freixenet, X. Cufí, J. Martí, Strategies for image segmentation combining region and boundary information, Pattern Recognition Letters, 24, 1–3, 375–392, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    M.I. Rajab, M.S. Woolfson, S.P. Morgan, Application of region-based segmentation and neural network edge detection to skin lesions, Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, 28, 1–2, 61–68, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    M. Mueller, K. Segl, H. Kaufmann, Edge- and region-based segmentation technique for the extraction of large, man-made objects in high-resolution satellite imagery, Pattern Recognition, 37, 8, 1619–1628, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Y. Zhou, J. Starkey, L. Mansinha, Segmentation of petrographic images by integrating edge detection and region growing, Computers & Geosciences, 30, 8, 817–831, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    M.I. Rajab, M.S. Woolfson, S.P. Morgan, Application of region-based segmentation and neural network edge detection to skin lesions, Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, 28, 1–2, 61–68, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    T. Chen, D. Metaxas, A hybrid framework for 3D medical image segmentation, Medical Image Analysis, 9, 6, 547–565, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    I. Dydenko, F. Jamal, O. Bernard, J. D’hooge, I.E. Magnin, D. Friboulet, A level set framework with a shape and motion prior for segmentation and region tracking in echocardiography, Medical Image Analysis, 10, 2, 162–177, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    S. Beucher, F. Meyer, ‘The morphological approach of segmentation: the watershed transformation’, in Dougherty E. (Ed.) Mathematical Morphology in Image Processing, Marcel Dekker, New York, 433–481, 1993.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    P.K. Saha, J.K. Udupa, D. Odhner, Scale-Based Fuzzy Connected Image Segmentation: Theory, Algorithms, and Validation, Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 77, 2, 145–174, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Q. Wang, Z. Chi, R. Zhao, Image Thresholding by Maximizing the Index of Nonfuzziness of the 2-D Grayscale Histogram, Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 85, 2, 100–116, 2002.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    G.C. Karmakar, L.S. Dooley, A generic fuzzy rule based image segmentation algorithm, Pattern Recognition Letters, 23, 10, 1215–1227, 2002.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    L. Patino, Fuzzy relations applied to minimize over segmentation in watershed algorithms, Pattern Recognition Letters, 26, 6, 819–828, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    W. Cai, S. Chen, D. Zhang, Fast and robust fuzzy c-means clustering algorithms incorporating local information for image segmentation, Pattern Recognition, 2006 (in press).Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    M. Grimnes, A. Aamodt, A two layer case-based reasoning architecture for medical image understanding, in I. Smith & B. Faltings (Eds.) Advances in Case-Based Reasoning, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 164–178 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    J. Jarmulak, Case-based classification of ultrasonic B-Scans: Case-base organisation and case retrieval, in B. Smyth and P. Cunningham (Eds.) Advances in Case-Based Reasoning, LNAI 1488, Springer Verlag. Berlin, 100–111, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    P. Perner, Different Learning Strategies in a Case-Based Reasoning System for Image Interpretation, in B. Smyth and P. Cunningham (Eds.), Advances in Case-Based Reasoning, LNAI 1488, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 251–261, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    R. Macura, K. Macura, MacRad: Radiology Image Resource with a Case-Based Retrieval System, in: M. Veloso and A. Aamodt (eds.), Case-Based Reasoning: Research and Development, Springer, Berlin, 43–45, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    M. Haddad, K-P. Adlassnig, G. Porenta, Feasibility analysis of a case-based reasoning system for automated detection of coronary heart disease from myocardial scintigrams, Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 9, 61–78, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    M.C. Jaulent, C. Le Bozec, E. Zapletal, P. Degoulet, Case based diagnosis in histopathology of breast tumours. Medinfo. 9 Pt 1:544–8, 1998.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    V. Ficet-Cauchard, C. Porquet, M. Revenu, CBR for the reuse of image processing knowledge: A recursive retrieval/adaption strategy, in K.-D. Althoff, R. Bergmann, L.K. Branting (Eds.) Case-Based Reasoning Research and Development, Springer, Berlin, 438–453, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    A. Micarelli, A. Neri, G. Sansonetti, A case-based approach to image recognition, in E. Blanzieri and L. Portinale (Eds.) Advances in Case-Based Reasoning, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 443–454, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    P. Perner, An Architecture for a CBR Image Segmentation System, Journal on Engineering Application in Artificial Intelligence, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 12 (6), 749–759, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    P. Perner, CBR Ultra Sonic Image Interpretation. in: E. Blanzieri and L. Portinale (Eds.), Advances in Case-based Reasoning, LNAI 1898, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 479–481, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    P. Perner, Incremental Learning of Retrieval Knowledge in a Case-Based Reasoning System, in K.D. Ashley and D.G. Bridge (Eds.), Case-Based Reasoning – Research and Development, LNAI 2689, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 422–436, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    P. Perner, Are case-based reasoning and dissimilarity-based classification two sides of the same coin? Journal Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 5/3, 205–216, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    P. Perner, TH. Günther, H. Perner, G. Fiss, R. Ernst, Health Monitoring by an Image Interpretation System - A System for Airborne Fungi Identification, in P. Perner, R. Brause, H-G. Holzhütter (Eds.), Medical Data Analysis, LNCS 2868, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 64–77, 2003.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    P. Perner, H. Perner, B. Müller, Similarity Guided Learning of the Case Description and Improvement of the System Performance in an Image Classification System, in S. Craw and A. Preece (Eds.), Advances in Case-Based Reasoning, LNAI 2416, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 604–612, 2002.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    P. Perner, S. Jähnichen, Case Acquisition and Case Mining for Case-Based Object Recognition, in P. Funk and P.A. González Calero (eds.), Advances in Case-Based Reasoning, LNAI 3155, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 616–629, 2004.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    P. Perner, A. Bühring, Case-Based Object Recognition, in P. Funk and P.A. González Calero (Eds.), Advances in Case-Based Reasoning, LNAI 3155, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 375–388, 2004.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    X. Yong, D. Feng, Z. Rongchun, M. Petrou, Learning-based algorithm selection for image segmentation, Pattern Recognition Letters, 26 (8), 1059–1068.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    S. Beucher, C. Lantuéjoul, Use of watersheds in contour detection, Proc. Int. Workshop on Image Processing, Real-time Edge and Motion Detection/estimation, Rennes, France, 12–21, 1979.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    W.E. Higgins, E.J. Ojard, Interactive morphological watershed analysis for 3D medical images, Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, 17, 4–5, 387–395, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    M. Baccar, L.A. Gee, R.C. Gonzalez, M.A. Abidi, Segmentation of range images via data fusion and morphological watersheds, Pattern Recognition, 29, 10, 1673–1687, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    J. Sijbers, P. Scheunders, M. Verhoye, A. Van der Linden, D. van Dyck, E. raman, Watershed-based segmentation of 3D MR data for volume quantization, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 15, 6, 679–688Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    P.S. Umesh Adiga, B.B. Chaudhuri, An efficient method based on watershed and rule-based merging for segmentation of 3-D histo-pathological images, Pattern Recognition, 34, 7,1449–1458, 2001.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    M.E. Rettmann, X. Han, C. Xu, J.L. Prince, Automated Sulcal Segmentation Using Watersheds on the Cortical Surface, NeuroImage, 15, 2, 329–344, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    M.M.J. Letteboer, O.F. Olsen, E.B. Dam, P.W.A. Willems, M.A. Viergever, W.J. Niessen, Segmentation of tumors in magnetic resonance brain images using an interactive multiscale watershed algorithm1, Academic Radiology, 11, 10, 1125–1138, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Y.-L. Huang, D.-R. Chen, Watershed segmentation for breast tumor in 2-D sonography, Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, 30, 5, 625–632, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    J.E. Cates, R.T. Whitaker, G.M. Jones, Case study: an evaluation of user-assisted hierarchical watershed segmentation, Medical Image Analysis, 9, 6, 566–578, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    R. Rodríguez, T.E. Alarcón, O. Pacheco, A new strategy to obtain robust markers for blood vessels segmentation by using the watersheds method, Computers in Biology and Medicine, 35, 8, 665–686, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Z. Wang, C. Song, Z. Wu, X. Chen, Improved watershed segmentation algorithm for high resolution remote sensing images using texture, Proc. IEEE Int Conf. IGARSS ’05, 5, 3721–3723, 2005.Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Y.-M. Li, X.-P. Zeng, A new strategy for urinary sediment segmentation based on wavelet, morphology and combination method, Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 2006 (in press).Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    N. Passat, C. Ronse, J. Baruthio, J.-P. Armspach, J. Foucher, Watershed and multimodal data for brain vessel segmentation: Application to the superior sagittal sinus, Image and Vision Computing, 2006 (in press).Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    J. Barraud, The use of watershed segmentation and GIS software for textural analysis of thin sections, Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 154, 1–2, 17–33, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    J. Yan, B. Zhao, L. Wang, A. Zelenetz, L. H. Schwartz, Marker-controlled watershed for lymphoma segmentation in sequential CT images, Medical Physics, 33, 7, 2452–2460, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    F. Meyer, S. Beucher, Morphological segmentation, Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation, 1, 1, 21–46, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    P.J. Soille, M.M. Ansoult, Automated basin delineation from digital elevation models using mathematical morphology, Signal Processing, 20, 2, Pages 171–182, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Ph. Salembier, Morphological multiscale segmentation for image coding, Signal Processing, 38, 3, 359–386, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    L. Najman, M. Schmitt, Watershed of a continuous function, Signal Processing, 38, 1, 99–112, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    F. Meyer, Topographic distance and watershed lines, Signal Processing, 38, 1, 113–125, 1994.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    R. Adams L. Bischof, Seeded Region Growing, IEEE Trans. on PAMI, 16, 6, 641–647, 1994.Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    T. Viero, D. Jeulin, Morphological Extraction of Line Networks from Noisy Low-Contrast Images, Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation, 6, 4, 335–347, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    D. Wang, A multiscale gradient algorithm for image segmentation using watersheds, Pattern Recognition, 30, 12, 2043–2052, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    A. Mehnert, P. Jackway, An improved seeded region growing algorithm, Pattern Recognition Letters, 18, 10, 1065–1071, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    L. Shafarenko, M. Petrou, J. Kittler, Automatic watershed segmentation of randomly textured color images, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 6, 11, 1530–1544, 1997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    J. Crespo, R.W. Schafer, J. Serra, C. Gratin, F. Meyer, The flat zone approach: A general low-level region merging segmentation method, Signal Processing, 62, 1, 37–60, 1997.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    A.N. Moga, B. Cramariuc, M. Gabbouj, Parallel watershed transformation algorithms for image segmentation, Parallel Computing, 24, 14, 1981–2001, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    E. Pratikakis, H. Sahli, J. Cornelis, Low level image partitioning guided by the gradient watershed hierarchy, Signal Processing, 75, 2, 173–195, 1999.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    A. Bieniek, A. Moga, An efficient watershed algorithm based on connected components, Pattern Recognition, 33, 6, 907–916, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    A. Bleau, L.J. Leon, Watershed-Based Segmentation and Region Merging, Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 77, 3, 317–370, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    J. Weickert, Efficient image segmentation using partial differential equations and morphology, Pattern Recognition, 34, 9, 1813–1824, 2001.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    J.B.T.M. Roerdink, A. Meijster, The watershed transform: definitions, algorithms and parallelization strategies, Fundamenta Informaticae, 41, 187–228, 2001.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    N. Malpica, J.E. Ortuño, A. Santos, A multichannel watershed-based algorithm for supervised texture segmentation, Pattern Recognition Letters, 24, 9–10, 1545–1554, 2003.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    J.-B. Kim, H.-J. Kim, Multiresolution-based watersheds for efficient image segmentation, Pattern Recognition Letters, 24, 1–3, pp 473–488, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    H.T. Nguyen, M. Worring, R. van den Boomgaard, Watersnakes: Energy-Driven Watershed Segmentation, IEEE Trans. on PAMI, 25, 3, 330–342, 2003.Google Scholar
  102. 102.
    C. Rosito Jung, J. Scharcanski, Robust watershed segmentation using wavelets, Image and Vision Computing, 23, 7, 661–669, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    C.G. Zhao, T.G. Zhuang, A hybrid boundary detection algorithm based on watershed and snake, Pattern Recognition Letters, 26, 9, 1256–1265, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    S.E. Hernandez, K.E. Barner, Y. Yuan, Region merging using homogeneity and edge integrity for watershed-based image segmentation, Optical Engineering, 44, 1, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    H. Sun, J. Yang, M. Ren, A fast watershed algorithm based on chain code and its application in image segmentation, Pattern Recognition Letters, 26, 9, 1266–1274, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    M. Frucci, G. Ramella, G. Sanniti di Baja, Using resolution pyramids for watershed image segmentation, Image and Vision Computing, 2006 (in press).Google Scholar
  107. 107.
    V. Osma-Ruiz, J.I. Godino-Llorente, N. Sáenz-Lechón, P. Gómez-Vilda, An improved watershed algorithm based on efficient computation of shortest paths, Pattern Recognition, 2006 (in press).Google Scholar
  108. 108.
    A. Duarte, Á. Sánchez, F. Fernández, A.S. Montemayor, Improving image segmentation quality through effective region merging using a hierarchical social metaheuristic, Pattern Recognition Letters, 27, 11 1239–1251, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    C. Rosito Jung, Combining wavelets and watersheds for robust multiscale image segmentation, Image and Vision Computing, 2006 (in press).Google Scholar
  110. 110.
    M. Frucci, Over segmentation Reduction by Flooding Regions and Digging Watershed Lines, International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, World Scientific, Singapore, 20, 1, 15–38, 2006.Google Scholar
  111. 111.
    F. Kummert, H. Niemann, R. Prechtel, G. Sagerer, Control and explanation in signal understanding environment, Signal Processing, 32, 111–145, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    J. Hunter, S. Little, A framework to enable the semantic inferencing and querying of multimedia content, International Journal of Web Engineering and Technology, 2-2/, 264–286, 2005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    P. Zamperoni, V. Starovotov, How dissimilar are two gray-scale images, Proc. 17 th DAGM Symposium, Springer, Berlin, 448–445, 1995.Google Scholar
  114. 114.
    D.L. Wilson, A.J. Baddeley, R.A. Owens, A new metric for grey-scale image comparision, Interna. Journal of Computer Vision, 24(1), 1–29, 1997.Google Scholar
  115. 115.
    H. Dreyer, W. Sauer, Prozessanalyse, Berlin, Verlag Technik, 1982.Google Scholar
  116. 116.
    R.M. Haralick, I. Dinstein, K. Shanmugam, Textural features for image classification, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 3(11), 610–630, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. 117.
    A.K. Jain, R.C. Dubes, Algorithms for clustering data, Prentice-Hall, Inc. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 1988.Google Scholar
  118. 118.
    A. Tversky, Feature similarity, Psychological Review 84(4), 327–350, 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. 119.
    S. Jänichen, P. Perner, Conceptual clustering and case generalization of 2-dimensional forms, Computational Intelligence, 22 (3/4), 177–193, 2006.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. 120.
    D. Wettschereck, D.W. Aha, Weighting Features, in M.M. Veloso and A. Aamodt (Eds.), Case-Based Reasoning Research and Development, Springer-Verlag, 347–358, 1995.Google Scholar
  121. 121.
    A. Karimi, L. Miskovic, D. Bonvin, Iterative correlation-based controller tuning, International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing, 18 (8), 645–664, 2004.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. 122.
    P.E. Gill, W. Murray, M.H. Wright, Practical Optimization, Academic Press, San Diego, USA, 1981.MATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Frucci
    • 1
  • P. Perner
    • 2
  • G. Sanniti di Baja
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Cybernetics “E. Caianiello”CNRPozzuoli (Naples)Italy
  2. 2.Institute of Computer Vision and Applied Computer ScienceLeipzigGermany

Personalised recommendations