Towards an Ontological Account of Agent-Oriented Goals

  • Renata S. S. Guizzardi
  • Giancarlo Guizzardi
  • Anna Perini
  • John Mylopoulos
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4408)

Abstract

The software agent paradigm has received considerable attention recently, both in research and industrial practice. However, adoption of this software paradigm remains elusive in software engineering practice. We claim that part of the adoption problem lies with the fact that mentalistic and social concepts underlying agents are subjective and complex for the average practitioner. Specifically, although there are many efforts related to the topic coming from philosophy, cognitive sciences and computer science, a uniform and well-founded semantic view on these concepts is currently lacking. This work extends an existing upper-level ontology and offers it as a foundation for evaluating and designing agent-oriented modeling languages. In particular, the paper focuses on the concept of goal, aiming at disambiguating its definition, discussing its different manifestations, and clarifying its relation to other important agent-related concepts. For that, we examine how goals are conceived and used according to some relevant literature on agent-orientation. In addition, related work on akin fields, especially philosophy and AI are used as a basis for the proposed ontological extensions.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [Bernon et al., 2004]
    Bernon, C., Cossentino, M., Gleizes, M., Turci, P., Zambonelli, F.: A Study of some Multi-agent Meta-models. In: Odell, J.J., Giorgini, P., Müller, J.P. (eds.) AOSE 2004. LNCS, vol. 3382, pp. 62–77. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)Google Scholar
  2. [Boella et al., 1999]
    Boella, G., Damiano, R., Lesmo, L.: A Utility Based Approach to Cooperation among Agents. In: Proceedings of the Worskhop on Foundations and applications of collective agent based systems (ESSLLI’99), Utrecht, The Netherlands (1999)Google Scholar
  3. [Bottazzi and Ferrario, 2005]
    Bottazzi, E., Ferrario, R.: A Path to an Ontology of Organizations. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Vocabularies, Ontologies and Rules for The Enterprise (VORTE’05), Enschede, The Netherlands, Centre for Telematics and Information Technology, CTIT (2005)Google Scholar
  4. [Bratman, 1987]
    Bratman, M.E.: Intentions, Plans, and Practical Reason. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1987)Google Scholar
  5. [Bresciani et al., 2004]
    Bresciani, P., Giorgini, P., Giunchiglia, F., Mylopoulos, J., Perini, A.: Tropos: An Agent-Oriented Software Development Methodology. International Journal of Autonomous Agents and Multi Agent Systems 8(3), 203–236 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [Castelfranchi, 1995]
    Castelfranchi, C.: Commitments: From Individual Intentions to Groups and Organizations. In: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems, MIT Press, Cambridge (1995)Google Scholar
  7. [Castelfranchi and Falcone, 1998]
    Castelfranchi, C., Falcone, R.: Towards a Theory of Delegation for Agent-Based Systems. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 24(24), 141–157 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [Cohen and Levesque, 1990]
    Cohen, P.R., Levesque, H.J.: Intention is Choice with Commitment. Artificial Intelligence 42(3), 213–261 (1990)CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. [Conte and Castelfranchi, 1995]
    Conte, R., Castelfranchi, C.: Cognitive and Social Action. UCL Press, London (1995)Google Scholar
  10. [Dastani et al., 2006]
    Dastani, M., van Riemsdijk, M.B., Meyer, J.-J.: Goal Types in Agent Programming. In: Proceedings of the 17th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Riva del Garda, Italy, pp. 220–224. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2006)Google Scholar
  11. [Dignum, 2004]
    Dignum, V.: A Model for Organizational Interaction: Based on Agents, Founded in Logic. PhD thesis, Utrecht University, The Netherlands (2004)Google Scholar
  12. [Esteva et al., 2002]
    Esteva, M., Padget, J.A., Sierra, C.: Formalizing a Language for Institutions and Norms. In: Meyer, J.-J.C., Tambe, M. (eds.) ATAL 2001. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2333, pp. 348–366. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [Ferber and Gutknecht, 1998]
    Ferber, J., Gutknecht, O.: A meta-model for the analysis and design of organizations in multi-agent systems. In: ICMAS ’98: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Multi Agent Systems, Washington, DC, USA, p. 128. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [Ghallab et al., 2004]
    Ghallab, M., Nau, D., Traverso, P.: Automated Planning: Theory and Practice. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo (2004)MATHGoogle Scholar
  15. [Guizzardi, 2005]
    Guizzardi, G.: Ontological Foundations for Structural Conceptual Models. PhD thesis, University of Twente, The Netherlands (2005)Google Scholar
  16. [Guizzardi and Wagner, 2005]
    Guizzardi, G., Wagner, G.: Some Applications of a Unified Foundational Ontology in Business Modeling. In: Rosemann, M., Green, P. (eds.) Ontologies and Business Systems Analysis, pp. 345–367. Idea Group, London (2005)Google Scholar
  17. [Guizzardi, 2006]
    Guizzardi, R.S.S.: Agent-oriented Constructivist Knowledge Management. PhD thesis, University of Twente, The Netherlands (2006)Google Scholar
  18. [Henderson-Sellers et al., 2005]
    Henderson-Sellers, B., Debenham, J., Tran, Q.-N.N., Cossentino, M., Low, G.: Identification of Reusable Method Fragments from the PASSI Agent-Oriented Methodology. In: Kolp, M., Bresciani, P., Henderson-Sellers, B., Winikoff, M. (eds.) AOIS 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3529, pp. 95–110. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [Hubner et al., 2002]
    Hubner, J.F., Sichman, J.S., Boissier, O.: A Model for the Structural, Functional, and Deontic Specification of Organizations in Multiagent Systems. In: Bittencourt, G., Ramalho, G.L. (eds.) SBIA 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2507, pp. 118–128. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [Masolo et al., 2003]
    Masolo, C., Borgo, S., Gangemi, A., Guarino, N., Oltramari, A.: Ontology Library, WonderWeb Deliverable. Technical Report D18, LOA-CNR, Trento, Italy (2003)Google Scholar
  21. [Odell et al., 2004]
    Odell, J., Nodine, M., Levy, R.: A Metamodel for Agents, Roles, and Groups. In: Odell, J.J., Giorgini, P., Müller, J.P. (eds.) AOSE 2004. LNCS, vol. 3382, pp. 78–92. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)Google Scholar
  22. [Perini and Susi, 2005]
    Perini, A., Susi, A.: Automating Model Transformations in Agent-Oriented Modelling. In: Müller, J.P., Zambonelli, F. (eds.) AOSE 2005. LNCS, vol. 3950, pp. 167–178. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [Rao and Georgeff, 1991]
    Rao, A.S., Georgeff, M.P.: Modeling Rational Agents within a BDI-Architecture. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR’91), Cambridge, MA, USA, pp. 473–484. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1991)Google Scholar
  24. [Shoham, 1993]
    Shoham, Y.: Agent-oriented Programming. Artificial Intelligence 60, 51–92 (1993)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  25. [van Lamsweerde, 2000]
    van Lamsweerde, A.: Requirements Engineering in the Year 00: A Research Perspective. In: Proceedings 22nd International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 5–19. ACM Press, New York (2000)Google Scholar
  26. [van Riemsdijk et al., 2005]
    van Riemsdijk, M.B., Dastani, M., Meyer, J.-J.: Semantics of Declarative Goals in Agent Programming. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Utrecht, The Netherlands (2005)Google Scholar
  27. [Wooldridge and Jennings, 1995]
    Wooldridge, M.J., Jennings, N.: Intelligent Agents: Theory and Practice. Knowledge Engineering Review 10(2), 115–152 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. [Yen et al., 2001]
    Yen, J., Yin, J., Ioerger, T.R., Miller, M.S., Xu, D., Volz, R.A.: CAST: Collaborative Agents for Simulating Teamwork. In: Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI’01), Seattle, WA, USA, pp. 1135–1144. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2001)Google Scholar
  29. [Yu, 1995]
    Yu, E.: Modeling Strategic Relationships for Process Reengineering. PhD thesis, University of Toronto, Canada (1995)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Renata S. S. Guizzardi
    • 1
  • Giancarlo Guizzardi
    • 2
    • 3
  • Anna Perini
    • 1
  • John Mylopoulos
    • 4
  1. 1.ITC-irst, Trento-PovoItaly
  2. 2.Department of Computer Science, UFES, Vitória-ESBrazil
  3. 3.Laboratory of Applied Ontologies (ISTC-CNR), TrentoItaly
  4. 4.Department of Computer Science, University of TorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations