Advertisement

The Antecedents of Online Consumers’ Perceived Usefulness of Website: A Protocol Analysis Approach

  • Cheng Yi
  • Zhenhui Jiang
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4553)

Abstract

Internet-based interactive multimedia technologies enable online firms to display featured products via a variety of product information and various presentation formats. This study investigates how consumers evaluate the usefulness of online product presentations from their experience with the virtual products. Three different product displays on two products are tested in a survey. Using a written protocol analysis approach, the study has confirmed our expectations on the impact of information quality and system quality on consumers’ online shopping experience.

Keywords

Product presentation vividness interactivity information quality perceived usefulness 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Szymanski, D.M., Henard, D.H.: Customer satisfaction: A meta-analysis of the empirical evidence. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. 29(1), 16–35 (2001)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Palmer, J.W.: Web Site Usability, Design, and Performance Metrics. Information Systems Research 13(2), 151–167 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zhang, Xiaoni, Keeling, K.B., Pavur, R.J.: Information quality of commercial Web site bome pages: An explorative analysis. In: Proc. International Conference of Information Systems, Brisbane, Australia, pp. 164–175 (2000)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Raney, A.A., Arpan, L.M., et al.: At the Movies, On the Web: An Investigation of the Effects of Entertaining and Interactive Web Content on Site and Brand Evaluation. Journal of Interactive Marketing 17(4), 38–53 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jiang, Z., Benbasat, I.: Virtual Product Experience: Effects of Visual and Functional Control of Products on Perceived Diagnosticity and Flow in Electronic Shopping. Journal of Management Information Systems 21(3), 111–148 (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Holbrook, M.B.: Progress and Problems in Research on Consumer Esthetics. In: Fourth International Conference on Cultural Economics and Planning, Avignon, France (1986) Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hoch, S.J., Deighton, J.: Managing What Consumers Learn from Experience. Journal of Marketing 53, 1–20 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Babin, B.J., Darden, W.R., Griffin, M.: Work and/or Fun: Measuring Hedonic and Utilitarian Shopping Value. The Journal of Consumer Research 20(4), 644–656 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Davis, F.D.: Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly 13(3), 319–340 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Seddon, Peter, B.: A respecification and extension of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success. Information Systems Research 8(3), 240–253 (1997)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    DeLone, W.H., McLean, E.R.: Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable. Information Systems Research 3(1), 60–95 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Klein, B.D.: User perceptions of data quality: Internet and traditional text sources. The Journal of Computer Information Systems 41(4), 9–18 (2001)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Knight, S., Burn, J.: Developing a Framework for Assessing Information Quality on the World Wide Web. Informing Science Journal 8 (2005)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Swanson, E.B.: Management Information Systems: Appreciation and Involvement. Management Science 21(2), 178–188 (1974)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    McKinney, V., Kanghyun, Y., Zahedi, F.M.: The Measurement of Web-Customer Satisfaction. An Expectation and Disconfirmation Approach 13(3), 296–315 (2002)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Steuer, J.: Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence. Communication 42, 73–93 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Schlosser, A.E.: Experiencing Products in the Virtual World: The Role of Goal and Imagery in Influencing Attitudes versus Purchase Intentions. Journal of Consumer Research 30(2), 184–198 (2003)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wang, R.Y., Strong, D.M.: Beyond Accuracy: What Data Quality Means to Data Consumers. Journal of Management Information Systems 12(4), 5–34 (1996)MATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Huang, K.L., W., Y., Wang, R.Y.: Quality Information and Knowledge. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ (1999)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Saracevic, T.: Relevance: A Review of and a Framework for the Thinking on the Notion in Information Science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 321–343 (1975)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Conger, S.A., Mason, R.O.: Planning and Designing Effective Web Sites. Course Technology, Cambridge, MA (1998)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hlynka, D., Welsh, J.: What Makes an Effective Home Page? A Critical Analysis (1996), available at:http://www.umanitoba.ca/faculties/education/cmns/aect.html
  23. 23.
    Mayer, R.E.: The Promise of Multimedia Learning: Using the Same Instructional Design Methods Across Different Media. Learning and Instruction 13, 125–139 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Park, R.C., Hopkins, R.: Instructional Conditions for Using Dynamic Visual Displays: A Review. Instructional Science 21, 427–449 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Paivio, A.: Imagery and verbal processes Holt, Rinehart, & Winston (1971)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Szuprowicz, B.O.: Interactive Communications: New Technologies and Future Directions. Computer Technology Research Corp., SC (1996)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hoffman, D.L., Novak, T.P.: Marketing in hypermedia computer-mediated environments: conceptual foundations. Journal of Marketing 60, 50–68 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bretz, R.: Media for Interactive Communication. Sage Publications, BeverlyHills, CA (1984)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kettanurak, V., Ramamurthy, K., et al.: User Attitude as a Mediator of Learning Performance Improvement in an Interactive Multimedia Environment: an Empirical Investigation of the Degree of Interactivity and Learning Styles. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 54, 541–583 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Radner, R., Rothschild, M.: On the Allocation of Effort. Journal of Economic Theory 10, 358–376 (1975)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Todd, P., Benbasat, I.: Process Tracing Methods in Decision Support Systems Research: Exploring the Black Box. MIS Quarterly 11(4), 493–512 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Swierina, R.J., Weick, K.E.: An Assessment of Laboratory Experiments in Accounting. Journal of Accounting Research, supplement 20 (1982)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Landis, J.R., Koch, G.G.:The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 158–174 (1977)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cheng Yi
    • 1
  • Zhenhui Jiang
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Information Systems, National University of Singapore 

Personalised recommendations