Evaluation of Wayfinding Aids Interface in Virtual Environment

  • Anna Wu
  • Wei Zhang
  • Bo Hu
  • Xiaolong Zhang
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4551)

Abstract

It is difficult for a navigator to find a way to a given target location in an unfamiliar environment. Often, wayfinding guidance such as an overview map is provided to assist the navigator. However, overview maps can only show survey knowledge at one particular scale, and cannot provide other kinds of spaital knowledge (e.g. procedure knowledge) or survey knowledge at different scales. In this study, we compared effectiveness, efficiency and satisfaction of three wayfinding aids, View-in-View Map (VVM), Animation Guide (AG) and Human-System Collaboration (HSC) in support of navigation in virtual reality. Our experiment results show that while an overview still outperforms AG and HSC, AG serves better for most people with ordinary spatial ability and people with superior spatial ability tends to perform better using HSC.

Keywords

Wayfinding Virtual environments Interactive techniques Spatial cognition 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Mackinlay, J.D., Card, S.K., Robertson, G.G.: Rapid Controlled Movement through a Virtual 3D Workspace. Computer Graphics 24(4), 171–176 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bliss, J.P.: The Effectiveness of Virtual Reality for Administering Spatial Navigation Traning to Firefighters. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 6, 73–86 (1997)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bartram, L.: Perceptual and Interpretative Properties of Motion for Information Visualization. In: The 1997 Workshop on New Paradigms in Information Visualization and Manipulation, Las Vegas, NV, USA (1997)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bjork, S.: Hierarchical Flip Zooming: Enabling Parallel Exploration of Hierarchical Visualizations. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Advanced Visual Interfaces, Palermo, Italy (2000)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Downs, R.M., Stea, D.: Image and Environment: Cognitive Mapping and Spatial Behavior. Aldine Publishing, Chicago (1973)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Siegel, A.W., Herman, J.F: The Development of Spatial Representations of Large-scale Environments. In: Reese, H.W. (ed.) Advances in Child Development and Behavior, vol. 10, pp. 9–55. Academic Publisher, New York (1975)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Witmer, B.G., Bailey, J.H., Knerr, B.W., Parsons, K.: Virtual spaces and real world places: transfer of route knowledge. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 45(4), 413–428 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ruddle, R.A., Payne, S.J., Jones, D.M.: Navigating Buildings in Desk-Top Virtual Environments: Experimental Investigations Using Extended Navigational Experience. Journal of Experimental Psychology 3(2), 143–159 (1997)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Goerger, S.R., Darken, R.P., Boyd, M.A., Gagnon, T.A.: Spatial Knowledge Acquisition from Maps and Virtual Environments in Complex Architectural Spaces. In: Proceedings of the 16th Applied Behavioral Sciences, Colorado Springs, CO, USA (1998)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    May, M., Peruch, P., Savoyant, A.: Navigating in a Virtual Environment With Map-Acquired Knowledge: Encoding and Alignment Effects. Ecological Psychology 7(1), 21–36 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Darken, R.P., Sibert, J.L.: A Toolset for Navigation in Virtual Environments. In: Proceedings of ACM User Interface Software & Technology, New York, NY, USA (1993)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chittaro, L., Venkataraman, S.: Navigation Aids for Multi-floor Virtual Buildings: a Comparative Evaluation of Two Approaches. In: the ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology, Limassol, Cyprus (2006)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Levinew, M., Marchon, I., Hanley, G.: The Placement and Mispalcement of you-are-here Maps. Environment and Behavior 16(2), 139–157 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Buering, T., Gerken, J., Reiterer, H.: Usability of Overview Supported Zooming on Small Screens with Regard to Individual Differences in Spatial. In: the working conference on Advanced visual interfaces, Venezia, Italy (2006)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhang, X., Furnas, G.W.: mCVEs:Using Cross-Scale Collaboration to Support User Interaction with Multiscale Structures. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 14(1), 31–46 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zhang, X.: Space-Scale Animation: Enhancing Cross-Scale Understanding of Multiscale Structures in Multiple Views. In: Proceedings of Coordinated and Multiple Views in Exploratory Visualization, London, UK (2005)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ballegooij, A. v., Eliens, A.: Navigation by Query in Virtual Worlds. In: Proceedings of the sixth international conference on 3D Web technology, Paderbon, Germany (2001)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chittaro, L., Burigat, S.: 3D Location-pointing as a Navigation Aid in Virtual Environments. In: Proceedings of AVI 2004: 7th International Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces, Gallipoli, Italy (2004)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ekstrom, R.B., French, J.W., Prince, L.A.: Kit of Reference Tests for Cognitive Factors. Educational Testing Services, Princeton, NJ (1963)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bodner, G.M., Guay, R.B.: The Purdue Visualization of Rotation (ROT) Test. The Chemical Educator 2(4), 1–17 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anna Wu
    • 1
  • Wei Zhang
    • 1
  • Bo Hu
    • 1
  • Xiaolong Zhang
    • 2
  1. 1.Lab of Virtual Reality & Human Interface Technology, Department of Industrial Engineering, Tsinghua University, 100084, BeijingChina
  2. 2.College of Information Sciences and Technology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, 16802, PAUSA

Personalised recommendations