Advertisement

Being Together: User’s Subjective Experience of Social Presence in CMC Environments

  • Ha Sung Hwang
  • SungBok Park
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4550)

Abstract

The concept of presence, or “being there,” has become a central issue for many researchers who study human-computer interaction. Although several dimensions of presence have been discussed in the literature, here we focus specifically on social presence as the feeling of “being together” in mediated communication environment by relating it to the three concepts: co-presence, mutual awareness and connectedness. We propose that this conceptualization is applicable to use in studying social interaction through various types of CMC technologies.

Keywords

Social Presence Co-Presence Mutual Awareness Connectedness Computer-Mediated Communication 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Short, J.A., Williams, E., Christie, B.: The social psychology of telecommunications. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, London (1976)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Walther, J.B.: Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Communication Research 19(1), 52–90 (1992)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hwang, H.: Predictors of IM use among U.S. College Students: Gratifications Sought, Gratifications Obtained, and Social Presence. In: International Communication Association, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gunawardena, C.N.: Social presence theory and implications for interaction collaborative learning in computer conferences. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications 1(2/3), 147–166 (1995)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nowak.: Defining and Differentiating Copresence, Social presence and Presence as Transportation. In: Paper presented at the Presence Workshop, Philadelphia (2001)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Towell, J., Towell, E.: Presence in text-based networked virtual environments or MUDS. Presence. Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 6(5), 590–595 (1997)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mason, R.: Using communications media in open and flexible learning. Kogan Page, London (1994)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Goffman, E.: Behavior in Public Places: Notes on the Social Organization of Gatherings. The Free Press, New York (1963)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Biocca, F., Nowak, K.: Plugging your body into the telecommunication system: Mediated embodiment, media interfaces, and social virtual environments. In: Lin, C., Atkin, D. (eds.) Communication technology and society, pp. 407–447. Hampton Press, Waverly Hill, VI (2001)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Biocca, F., Harms, C., Burgoon, J.: Toward a More Robust Theory and Measure of Social Presence: Review and Suggested Criteria. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 12, 456–480 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    McIssac, M.S., Gunawardena, C.N.: Distance education. In: Jonassen, D. (ed.) Handbook for research on educational communications and technology, pp. 403–437. Scholastic Press, New York (1996)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sallnas, E., Rassmus-grohn, K.: Supporting presence in collaborative environments by force feedback. AMC Transactions on human-computer interaction 7(4), 461–476 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Heeter, C.: Being There: The subjective experience of presence. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 1(2), 262–271 (1992)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Durlach, N., Slater, M.: Presence in shared virtual environments and virtual togetherness. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 9(2), 214–217 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Smith, E., Mackie, D.: Social Psychology. Psychology Press, New York (2000)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ijsselsteijn, W.: Staying in Touch: Social Presence and Connectedness through Synchronous and Asynchronous Communication Media. In: Proceedings of HCI International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 924–928. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey (2003)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rettie, R.M.: A Comparison of Four New Communication Technologies. In: Proceedings of HCI International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 686–690. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey (2003)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Townsend, A.M.: Mobile Communications in the Twenty-first Centry. In: Brown, B., Green, N., Harper, R. (eds.) Wireless World, Springer Verlag, United Kingdom (2001)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hiltz, S.R., Johnson, K., Turonff, M.: Experiments in groups decision making: Communication process and outcome in face-to-face versus computerized conference. Human Communication Research 13(2), 225–252 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Daft, R., Lengel, R.: Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science 32(5), 554–571 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Steinfield, C.W.: Computer-mediated communication in an organizational setting: Explaining task-related and socioemotional uses. In: Mclaughlin, M.L. (ed.) Communication Yearbook, vol. 9, pp. 777–804. Sage, Newbury Park, CA (1986)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Papacharissi, Z., Rubin, A.M.: Predictors of Internet Use. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 44, 175–196 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Garramone, G., Harris, A., Anderson, R.: Use of political computer bulletin boards. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 30(3), 325–339 (1986)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Perse, E.I., Burton, P., Kovner, E., Lears, M.E., Sen, R.J.: Predicting computer-mediated communication in a college class. Communication Research Reports 9(2), 161–170 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Tu, C.H.: The impact of text-based CMC on online social presence. The Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 1(2) (2002)[On-line] Available http://www.ncolr.org
  26. 26.
    Foulger, D.A.: Medium as process: The structure, use, and practice of computer conferencing on IBM’s IBMPC computer conferencing facility. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Temple University, Philadelphia (1990)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hackman, M.Z., Walker, K.B.: Instructional communication in the televised classroom: The effects of system design and teacher immediacy on student learning and satisfaction. Communication Education 39(3), 196–206 (1990)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gunawardena, C.N, Zittle, F.J.: Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer-mediated conferencing environment. The. American Journal of Distance Education 11(3), 8–26 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Richardson, J.C., Swan, K.: Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students’ perceived learning and satisfaction. JALN 7(1), 68–88 (2003)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Blocher, J.M.: Self-regulation of strategies and motivation to enhance interaction and social presence in computer mediated communication. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University (1997)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lin, G.: Social Presence Questionnaire of Online Collaborative Learning: Development and Validity. In: Paper presented at the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Chicago, IL (October 19-23, 2004)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lombard, M., Ditton, T.B.: At the Heart of It All: The Concept of Presence. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(2) (1997) [On-line] Available http://www.ascusc.org.jcmc/vo13/issue2/

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ha Sung Hwang
    • 1
  • SungBok Park
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Journalism and Mass Communication, Hanyang University, 17 Haengdang-dong, Seongdong-gu, SeoulSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations