Conversations Amidst Computing: A Study of Interruptions and Recovery of Task Activity

  • Shamsi T. Iqbal
  • Eric Horvitz
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4511)

Abstract

We present results from a field study investigating the influence of conversations on the multitasking behavior of computer users. We report on several findings, including the timing of the resumption of tasks following conversational interruptions and on the nature and rate of computing activities that are performed concurrently with conversation.

Keywords

Interruption disruption recovery conversation cognitive models 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Avrahami, D., Hudson, S.: Communication characteristics of instant messaging: Effects and predictions of interpersonal relationships. In: CSCW, pp. 505–514 (2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Czerwinski, M., Horvitz, E., Wilhite, S.: A diary study of task switching and interruptions. In: CHI, pp. 175–182 (2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gonzalez, V.M., Mark, G.: Constant, multi-tasking craziness: managing multiple working spheres. In: CHI, pp. 113–120 (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Horvitz, E., Apacible, J.: Learning and reasoning about interruption. In: ICMI, pp. 20–27 (2003) Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Iqbal, S.T., Horvitz, E.: Disruption and recovery of computing tasks: Field study, analysis, and directions. In: CHI 2007 (to appear 2007) Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Isaacs, E., Walendowski, A., Whittaker, S., Schiano, D.J., Kamm, C.: The character, functions, and styles of instant messaging in the workplace. In: CSCW 2002, pp. 11–20 (2002) Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Treisman, A.M.: Contextual cues in selective listening. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12, 242–248Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wickens, C.D.: Multiple Resources and Performance Prediction. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomic Science, 3 (2), 159–177Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wickens, C.D., Hollands, J.: Engineering psychology and human performance, Upper Saddle River, NJ. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (2000)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yantis, S.: Stimulus-Driven Attentional capture and attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19 (3), 676–681Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shamsi T. Iqbal
    • 1
  • Eric Horvitz
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Computer Science, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801 
  2. 2.Microsoft Research, One Microsoft Way, Redmond, WA 98052 

Personalised recommendations