Advertisement

Exploiting Evidence Analysis in Plan Recognition

  • Sandra Carberry
  • Stephanie Elzer
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4511)

Abstract

Information graphics, such as bar charts and line graphs, that appear in popular media generally have a message that they are intended to convey. We have developed a novel plan inference system that uses evidence in the form of communicative signals from the graphic to recognize the graphic designer’s intended message. We contend that plan inference research would benefit from examining how each of its evidence sources impacts the system’s success. This paper presents such an evidence analysis for the communicative signals that are captured in our plan inference system, and the paper shows how the results of this evidence analysis are informing our research on plan recognition and application systems.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Chester, D., Elzer, S.: Getting computers to see information graphics so users do not have to. In: Proc. of 15th Int. Symp. on Methodologies for Intelligent Systems (2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Perrault, R., Allen, J.: A Plan-Based Analysis of Indirect Speech Acts. American Journal of Computational Linguistics 6(3-4), 167–182 (1980)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kerpedjiev, S., Roth, S.: Mapping communicative goals into conceptual tasks to generate graphics in discourse. In: Proc. of Intelligent User Interfaces, pp. 60–67 (2000)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Elzer, S., Green, N., Carberry, S., Hoffman, J.: A model of perceptual task effort for bar charts and its role in recognizing intention. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, pp. 1–30 (2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    GraphPad Software. QuickCalcs: Online Calculators for Scientists (2002) http://www.graphpad.com/quickcalcs/McNemarEx.cfm
  6. 6.
    Shriberg, E., Bates, R., Stolcke, A., Taylor, P., Jurafsky, D., Ries, K., Coccaro, N., Martin, R., Meteer, M., Van Ess-Dykema, C.: Can prosody aid the automatic classification of dialog acts in conversational speech? Language and Speech (1998)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Forbes-Riley, K., Litman, D.: Predicting emotion in spoken dialogue from multiple knowledge sources. In: Proceedings of the HLT/NAACL, pp. 201–208 (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Moldovan, D., Pasca, M., Harabagiu, S., Surdeanu, M.: Performance issues and error analysis in an open-domain question answering system. In: Proc. of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Assocation for Computational Linguistics, pp. 33–40 (2002)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Daniel, W.: Applied Nonparametric Statistics. Houghton Mifflin (1978)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kennel, A.: Audiograf: A diagram-reader for the blind. In: Second Annual ACM Conference on Assistive Technologies, pp. 51–56 (1996)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sandra Carberry
    • 1
  • Stephanie Elzer
    • 2
  1. 1.Dept. of Computer Science, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716USA
  2. 2.Dept. of Computer Science, Millersville University, Millersville, PA 17551USA

Personalised recommendations