Telesurgery pp 125-139 | Cite as

Robotic Surgery in Ophthalmology

  • Angelo Tsirbas
  • C.W. Mango
  • J.P. Hubschman

Abstract

Innovations in ophthalmology have expanded greatly in recent years. Miniaturization of operating instruments, refinements in surgical technique, and use of laser delivery systems have all been recognized as key contributions to the realm of ocular surgery. Increased precision, decreased operating time, and improved surgical outcomes have directly resulted from these advances. We feel that the next major advancement in ophthalmology is the integration of robotic surgery.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Paul H, Bargar WL, Mittestadt B et al (1992) Development of a surgical robot for cementless total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 285:57–66PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Buckingham RA, Buckingham RO (1995) Robots in operating theatres. Br Med J 311:1479–1482Google Scholar
  3.  3. Ruurda JP, Broeders IAMJ, Simmermacher RPM et al (2002) Feasibility of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 12:41–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4.  4. Kumar R, Hemal AK (2005) Emerging role of robotics in urology. J Min Access Surg 1:202–210Google Scholar
  5.  5. Dasgupta P, Challacombe B, Murphy D et al (2006) Coming full circle in robotic urology. BJU Int 98:4–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6.  6. Kaul S, Laungani R, Sarle R et al (2007) da Vinci-assisted robotic partial nephrectomy: technique and results at a mean of 15 months of follow-up. Eur Urol 51:186–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7.  7. Diaz-Arrastia C, Jurnalov C, Gomez G, Townsend Jr C (2002) Laparoscopic hysterectomy using a computer-enhanced surgical robot. Surg Endosc 16:1271–1273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8.  8. Beste TM, Nelson KH, Daucher JA (2005) Total laparoscopic hysterectomy utilizing a robotic surgical system. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 9:13–15Google Scholar
  9.  9. Katz MR, Van Praet F, de Canniere D et al (2006) Integrated coronary revascularization: percutaneous coronary intervention plus robotic totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass. Circulation 114:473–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. McClure RS, Kiaii B, Novick RJ et al (2006) Computer-enhanced telemanipulation in mitral valve repair: preliminary experience in Canada with the da Vinci robotic system. Can J Surg 49:193–196PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Kypson AP, Chitwood WR (2006) Robotic cardiovascular surgery. Expert Rev Med Devices 3:335–343PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Labontiu A (2001) The da Vinci surgical system performing computer-enhanced surgery. Osp Ital Chir 7:367–372Google Scholar
  13. Hashizume M, Konishi K, Tsutsumi N et al (2002) A new era of robotic surgery assisted by a computer-enhanced surgical system. Surgery 131:S330–S333PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14. Prasad SM, Prasad SM, Maniar HS et al (2004) Surgical robotics: impact of motion scaling on task performance. J Am Coll Surg 199:863–868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hernandez JD, Bann SD and Munz Y et al (2004) Qualitative and quantitative analysis of the learning curve of a simulated surgical task on the da Vinci system. Surg Endosc 18:372–378PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Moorthy K, Munz Y, Dosis A et al (2004) Dexterity enhancement with robotic surgery. Surg Endosc 18:790–795PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Gomez-Blanco M, Riviere CN, Khosla PK (2000) Intraoperative tremor monitoring for vitreoretinal microsurgery. Stud Health Technol Inform 70:99–101PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Riviere CN, Jensen PS (2000) A study of instrument motion in retinal microsurgery. Abstract presented at 21st Annual Conference of IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc, 26 June 26 2000, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  19. Tsirbas A, Mango C, Dutson E (2007) Robotic ocular surgery. Br J Ophthalmol 91:18–21PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hubschman J, Bourla D, Tsirbas A et al (2007) Robotic vitreoretinal surgery. Presented at the 2007 ARVO Annual Meeting, 6–10 May, Ft. Lauderdale, Fla. Google Scholar
  21. Marescaux J, Leroy J, Gagner M et al (2001) Transatlantic robot-assisted telesurgery. Nature 413:379–380PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Marescaux J, Leroy J, Rubino F et al (2002) Transcontinental robot-assisted remote telesurgery: feasibility and potential applications. Ann Surg 235:487–492PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Marescaux J, Rubino F (2004) Robot-assisted remote surgery: technological advances, potential complications, and solutions. Surg Technol Int 12:23–26PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Satava RM (1999) Emerging technologies for surgery in the 21st century. Arch Surg 134:1197–1202PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ballantyne GH (2002) The pitfalls of laparoscopic surgery: challenges for robotics and telerobotic surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 12:1–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Krummel TM (1998) Surgical simulation and virtual reality: the coming revolution. Ann Surg 228:635–637PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rosser JC, Wood M, Payne JH, Fullum TM, Lisehorn GB, Rosser LE, Barcia PJ, Savalgi RS (1997) Telementoring: a practical option in surgical training. Surg Endosc 11:852–855PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lee BR, Caddedu JA, Janetschek G, Schulman P, Docimo SG, Moore RG, Partin AW, Kavoussi LR (1998) International surgical telementoring: our initial experience. Stud Health Technol Inform 50:41–47PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Lee BR, Png DJ, Liew L, Fabrizio M, Li MK, Jarrett JW, Kavoussi LR (2000) Laparoscopic telesurgery between the United States and Singapore. Ann Acad Med Singapore 29:665–668PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Lee BR, Bishoff JT, Janetschek G, Bunyaratevej P, Kamolpronwijit W, Cadeddu JA, Ratchanon S, O’Kelley S, Kavoussi LR (1998) A novel method of surgical instruction: international telementoring. World J Urol 16:367–370PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Micali S, Virgili G, Vannozzi E, Grassi N, Jarrett TW, Bauer JJ, Vespasiani G, Kavoussi JR (2000) Feasibility of telementoring between Baltimore (USA) and Rome, Italy. J Endourol 14:493–496PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Taniguchi E, Ohashi S (2000) Construction of a regional telementoring network for endoscopic surgery in Japan. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 4:195–199PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Cubano M, Poulouse BK, Talamini MA, Stewart R, Antosek LE, Lentz R, Nibe R, Nutka M, Mendoza-Sagaon M (1999) Long distance telementoring: a novel tool for laparoscopy aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln. Surg Endosc 13:673–678PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Angelo Tsirbas
    • 1
  • C.W. Mango
    • 2
  • J.P. Hubschman
    • 3
  1. 1.David Geffen School of MedicineUniversity of CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.Weill Cornell Medical CollegeCornell University – NY Presbyterian HospitalCornellUSA
  3. 3.Department of OphthalmologyJules Stein Eye InstituteLos, AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations