Getting Plant—Soil Feedbacks out of the Greenhouse: Experimental and Conceptual Approaches

  • Andrew Kulmatiski
  • Paul Kardol
Part of the Progress in Botany book series (BOTANY, volume 69)

Plant-soil feedbacks (PSFs) contain two steps: (a) different plant species must create different soils and (b) these different soils must alter subsequent plant growth. Two-phase experiments are used to demonstrate PSF. In Phase I, soils are cultivated by known plants. In Phase II, plants are used as phytometers to measure soil differences created in Phase I. Ideally, a third phase, Phase III, is performed in which soil analyses and inoculation experiments are used to identify mechanisms of PSFs. A review of the literature reveals 25 studies that performed phases I and II. Of these 25 studies, 22 used grassland species, 21 were performed in a greenhouse, 19 were published between 2004 and 2006, and 12 used non-native species. Across studies, 271 feedback values were reported. Negative feedbacks represented 147 of the 271 values and produced, on average, a 37% reduction in plant biomass. Positive feedbacks represented 41 tests and produced, on average, a 43% increase in biomass.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agrawal AA, Kotanen PM, Mitchell CE, Power AG, Godsoe W, Klironomos J (2005) Enemy release? An experiment with congeneric plant pairs and diverse above- and belowground enemies. Ecology 86:2979–2989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Belnap J, Phillips SL, Sherrod SK, Moldenke A (2005) Soil biota can change after exotic plant invasion: does this affect ecosystem processes? Ecology 86:3007–3017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benizri E, Amiaud B (2005) Relationship between plants and soil microbial communities in fertilized grasslands. Soil Biol Biochem 37:2055–2064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bever JD (1994) Feedback between plants and their soil communities in an old field community. Ecology 75:1965–1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bever JD (1999) Dynamics within mutualism and the maintenance of diversity: inference from a model of interguild frequency dependence. Ecol Lett 2:52–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bever JD (2003) Soil community feedback and the coexistence of competitors: conceptual frameworks and empirical tests. New Phytol 157:465–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bever JD, Westover KM, Antonovics J (1997) Incorporating the soil community into plant population dynamics: the utility of the feedback approach. J Ecol 85:561–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bezemer TM, De Deyn GB, Bossinga TM, Dam NM van, Harvey JA, Putten WH van der (2005) Soil community composition drives aboveground plant-herbivore-parasitoid interactions. Ecol Lett 8:652–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bezemer TM, Harvey JA, Kowalchuk GA, Korpershoek H, Putten WH van der (2006a) Interplay between Senecio jacobaea and plant, soil, and aboveground insect community composition. Ecology 87:2002–2013.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Bezemer TM, Lawson CS, Hedlund K, Edwards AR, Brook AJ, Igual JM, Mortimer SR, van der Putten WH (2006b) Plant species and functional group effects on abiotic and microbial soil properties and plant–soil feedback responses in two grasslands. J Ecol 94:893–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bockus WW, Shroyer JP (1998) The impact of reduced tillage on soilborne plant pathogens. Annu Rev Phytopathol 36:485–500.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Bodelier PLE, Stomp M, Santamaria L, Klaassen M, Laanbroek HJ (2006) Animal–plant–microbe interactions: direct and indirect effects of swan foraging behaviour modulate methane cycling in temperate shallow wetlands. Oecologia 149:233–244.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Bonanomi G, Mazzoleni S (2005) Soil history affects plant growth and competitive ability. Community Ecol 6:23–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bonanomi G, Giannino F, Mazzoleni S (2005a) Negative plant–soil feedback and species coexistence. Oikos 111:311–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bonanomi G, Rietkerk M, Dekker SC, Mazzoleni S (2005b) Negative plant–soil feedback and positive species interaction in a herbaceous plant community. Plant Ecol 181:269–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bossio DA, Girvan MS, Verchot L, Bullimore J, Borelli T, Albrecht A, Scow KM, Ball AS, Pretty JN, Osborn AM (2005) Soil microbial community response to land use change in an agricultural landscape of Western Kenya. Microb Ecol 49:50–62.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Bossio DA, Fleck JA, Scow KM, Fujii R (2006) Alteration of soil microbial communities and water quality in restored wetlands. Soil Biol Biochem 38:1223–1233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bruggen AHC van, Semenov AM (2000) In search of biological indicators for soil health and disease suppression. Appl Soil Ecol 15:13–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Calderon FJ, Jackson LE, Scow KM, Rolston DE (2000) Microbial responses to simulated tillage in cultivated and uncultivated soils. Soil Biol Biochem 32:1547–1559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Callaway RM, Aschehoug ET (2000) Invasive plants versus their new and old neighbors: a mechanism for exotic invasion. Science 290:521–523.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Callaway RM, Thelen GC, Barth S, Ramsey PW, Gannon JE (2004a) Soil fungi alter interactions between the invader Centaurea maculosa and North American natives. Ecology 85:1062–1071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Callaway RM, Thelen GC, Rodriguez A, Holben WE (2004b) Soil biota and exotic plant invasion. Nature 427:731–733.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Carey EV, Marler MJ, Callaway RM (2004) Mycorrhizae transfer carbon from a native grass to an invasive weed: evidence from stable isotopes and physiology. Plant Ecol 172:133–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. De Deyn GB, Raaijmakers CE, Putten WH van der (2004a) Plant community development is affected by nutrients and soil biota. J Ecol 92:824–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. De Deyn GB, Raaijmakers CE, Ruijven J van, Berendse F, Putten WH van der (2004b) Plant species identity and diversity effects on different trophic levels of nematodes in the soil food web. Oikos 106:576–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. De la Pena E, Echeverria SR, Putten WH van der, Freitas H, Moens M (2006) Mechanism of control of root-feeding nematodes by mycorrhizal fungi in the dune grass Ammophila arenaria. New Phytol 169:829–840.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. DeGrood SH, Claassen VP, Scow KM (2005) Microbial community composition on native and drastically disturbed serpentine soils. Soil Biol Biochem 37:1427–1435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ehrenfeld JG (2003) Effects of exotic plant invasions on soil nutrient cycling processes. Ecosystems 6:503–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ehrenfeld JG, Ravit B, Elgersma K (2005) Feedback in the plant–soil system. Annu Rev Environ Resour 30:75–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Eppinga MB, Rietkerk M, Dekker SC, De Ruiter PC, Putten WH van der (2006) Accumulation of local pathogens: a new hypothesis to explain exotic plant invasions. Oikos 114:168–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Eppstein MJ, Bever JD, Molofsky J (2006) Spatio-temporal community dynamics induced by frequency dependent interactions. Ecol Model 197:133–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Frank DA, Gehring CA, Machut L, Phillips M (2003) Soil community composition and the regulation of grazed temperate grassland. Oecologia 137:603–609.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Gustafson DJ, Casper BB (2004) Nutrient addition affects AM fungal performance and expression of plant/fungal feedback in three serpentine grasses. Plant Soil 259:9–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hamel C, Vujanovic V, Jeannotte R, Nakano-Hylander A, St-Arnaud M (2005) Negative feedback on a perennial crop: Fusarium crown and root rot of Asparagus is related to changes in soil microbial community structure. Plant Soil 268:75–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hansen MJ, Clevenger AP (2005) The influence of disturbance and habitat on the presence of non-native plant species along transport corridors. Biol Conserv 125:249–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hawkes CV, Wren IF, Herman DJ, Firestone MK (2005) Plant invasion alters nitrogen cycling by modifying the soil nitrifying community. Ecol Lett 8:976–985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hecke MM van, Treonis AM, Kaufman JR (2005) How does the fungal endophyte Neotyphodium coenophialum affect tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea) rhizodeposition and soil microorganisms? Plant Soil 275:101–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kardol P, Bezemer TM, Putten WH van der (2006) Temporal variation in plant–soil feedback controls succession. Ecology Lett 9:1080–1088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kardol P, Cornips NJ, Kempen ML van, Bakx-Shotman JM, Putten WH van der (2007) Microbe-mediated plant–soil feedback causes historical contingency effects in plant community assembly. Ecological Monographs 77:147–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Klironomos JN (2002) Feedback with soil biota contributes to plant rarity and invasiveness in communities. Nature 417:67–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Knevel IC, Lans T, Menting FBJ, Hertling UM, Putten WH van der (2004) Release from native root herbivores and biotic resistance by soil pathogens in a new habitat both affect the alien Ammophila arenaria in South Africa. Oecologia 141:502–510.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Kulmatiski A (2006) Exotic plants establish persistent communities. Plant Ecol 187:261–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kulmatiski A., Beard KH, Stark JM (2006) Soil history as a primary control on plant invasion in abandoned agricultural fields. J Appl Ecol 43:868–876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Larkin RP, Hopkins DL, Maritin FN (1993) Effect of successive watermelon plantings on Fusarium oxysporum and other micro-organisms in soils suppressive and conducive to Fusarium wilt of watermelon. Phytopathology 83:1097–1105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Levine JM, Pachepsky E, Kendall BE, Yelenik SG, Lambers JHR (2006) Plant–soil feedbacks and invasive spread. Ecology Lett 9:1005–1014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Macel M, Lawson CS, Mortimer SR, Smilauerova M, Bischoff A, Cremieux L, Dolezal L, Edwards AR, Lanta V, Bezemer TM, Putten WH van der, Igual JM, Rodriguez-Barrueco C, Muller-Scharer H, Steinger T (2007) Climate vs. soil factors in adaptation of two common plant species. Ecology (in press).Google Scholar
  47. Matthews JW, Clay K (2001) Influence of fungal endophyte infection on plant–soil feedback and community interactions. Ecology 82:500–509.Google Scholar
  48. McKinley VL, Peacock AD, White DC (2005) Microbial community PLFA and PHB responses to ecosystem restoration in tallgrass prairie soils. Soil Biol Biochem 37:1946–1958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mills KE, Bever JD (1998) Maintenance of diversity within plant communities: soil pathogens as agents of negative feedback. Ecology 79:1595–1601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mitchell CE, Power AG (2003) Release of invasive plants from fungal and viral pathogens. Nature 421:625–627.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Molofsky J, Bever JD, Antonovics J (2001) Coexistence under positive frequency dependence. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 268:273–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Morris C, Call CA, Monaco TA, Grossl PR, Dewey SA (2006) Evaluation of elemental allelopathy in Acroptilon repens (L.) DC. (Russian Knapweed). Plant Soil 289:279–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Murakami H, Tsushima S, Shishido Y (2000) Soil suppressiveness to clubroot disease of Chinese cabbage caused by Plasmodiophora brassicae. Soil Biol Biochem 32:1637–1642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Packer A, Clay K (2000) Soil pathogens and spatial patterns of seedling mortality in a temperate tree. Nature 404:278–281.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Peek MS, Leffler AJ, Ivans CY, Ryel RJ, Caldwell MM (2005) Fine root distribution and persistence under field conditions of three co-occurring Great Basin species of different life form. New Phytol 165:171–180.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Peltzer DA (2001) Plant responses to competition and soil origin across a prairie-forest boundary. J Ecol 89:176–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Porazinska DL, Bardgett RD, Blaauw MB, Hunt HW, Parsons AN, Seastedt TR, Wall DH (2003) Relationships at the aboveground–belowground interface: Plants, soil biota, and soil processes. Ecol Monogr 73:377–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Potthoff M, Steenwerth KL, Jackson LE, Drenovsky RE, Scow KM, Joergensen RG (2006) Soil microbial community composition as affected by restoration practices in California grassland. Soil Biol Biochem 38:1851–1860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Ravit B, Ehrenfeld JG, Haggblom MM (2003) A comparison of sediment microbial communities associated with Phragmites australis and Spartina alterniflora in two brackish wetlands of New Jersey. Estuaries 26:465–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Ravit B, Ehrenfeld JG, Haggblom MM (2006) Effects of vegetation on root-associated microbial communities: A comparison of disturbed versus undisturbed estuarine sediments. Soil Biol Biochem 38:2359–2371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Reichard SH, Hamilton CW (1997) Predicting invasions of woody plants introduced into North America. Conserv Biol 11:193–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Reinhart KO, Callaway RM (2004) Soil biota facilitate exotic Acer invasions in Europe and North America. Ecol Appl 14:1737–1745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Reinhart KO, Callaway RM (2006) Soil biota and invasive plants. New Phytol 170:445–457.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Reinhart KO, Packer A, Putten WH van der, Clay K (2003) Plant–soil biota interactions and spatial distribution of black cherry in its native and invasive ranges. Ecol Lett 6:1046–1050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Reinhart KO, Greene E, Callaway RM (2005a) Effects of Acer platanoides invasion on understory plant communities and tree regeneration in the northern Rocky Mountains. Ecography 28:573–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Reinhart KO, Royo AA, Van der Putten WH, Clay K (2005b) Soil feedback and pathogen activity in Prunus serotina throughout its native range. J Ecol 93:890–898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Rejmanek M, Richardson DM (1996) What attributes make some plant species more invasive? Ecology 77:1655–1661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Reynolds HL, Packer A, Bever JD, Clay K (2003) Grassroots ecology: plant–microbe–soil interactions as drivers of plant community structure and dynamics. Ecology 84:2281–2291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Sheley RL, Petroff JK (1998) Biology and management of noxious rangeland weeds. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis.Google Scholar
  70. Spehn EM, Hector A, Joshi J, Scherer-Lorenzen M, Schmid B, Bazeley-White E, Beierkuhnlein C, Caldeira MC, Diemer M, Dimitrakopoulos PG, Finn JA, Freitas H, Giller PS, Good J, Harris R, Hogberg P, Huss-Danell K, Jumpponen A, Koricheva J, Leadley PW, Loreau M, Minns A, Mulder CPH, O’Donovan G, Otway SJ, Palmborg C, Pereira JS, Pfisterer AB, Prinz A, Read DJ, Schulze ED, Siamantziouras ASD, Terry AC, Troumbis AY, Woodward FI, Yachi S, Lawton JH (2005) Ecosystem effects of biodiversity manipulations in European grasslands. Ecol Monogr 75:37–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Steenwerth KL, Jackson LE, Calderon FJ, Stromberg MR, Scow KM (2002) Soil microbial community composition and land use history in cultivated and grassland ecosystems of coastal California. Soil Biol Biochem 34:1599–1611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Steinkellner S, Langer L (2004) Impact of tillage on the incidence of Fusarium spp in soil. Plant Soil 267:13–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Stoel CD van der, Putten WH van der, Duyts H (2002) Development of a negative plant–soil feedback in the expansion zone of the clonal grass Ammophila arenaria following root formation and nematode colonization. J Ecol 90:978–988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Stylinski CD, Allen EB (1999) Lack of native species recovery following severe exotic disturbance in southern Californian shrublands. J Appl Ecol 36:544–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Suding KN, Gross KL, Houseman GR (2004) Alternative states and positive feedbacks in restoration ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 19:46–53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Suguenza C, Corkidi L, Allen EB (2006) Feedbacks of soil inoculum of mycorrhizal fungi altered by N deposition on the growth of a native shrub and an invasive annual grass. Plant Soil 286:153–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Troelstra SR, Wagenaar R, Smant W, Peters BAM (2001) Interpretation of bioassays in the study of interactions between soil organisms and plants: involvement of nutrient factors. New Phytol 150:697–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. van der Putten WH (1997) Plant–soil feedback as a selective force. Trends Ecol Evol 12:169–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. van der Putten WH, Dijk C van, Troelstra SR (1988) Biotic soil factors effecting growth and development of Ammophila arenaria. Oecologia 76:313–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. van der Putten WH, Dijk C van, Peters BAM (1993) Plant-specific soil-borne diseases contribute to succession in foredune vegetation. Nature 362:53–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. van der Putten WH, Vet LEM, Harvey JA, Wackers FL (2001) Linking above- and belowground multitrophic interactions of plants, herbivores, pathogens, and their antagonists. Trends Ecol Evol 16:547–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. van der Putten WH Kowalchuk GA, Brinkman EP, Doodman GTA, Kaaij RM van der, Kamp AFD, Menting FBJ, Veenendaal EM (2007) Soil feedback of exotic savannah grass relates to the absence of pathogens and selective mycorhizal fungi. Ecology (in press).Google Scholar
  83. Vogelsang KM., Reynolds HL, Bever JD (2006) Mycorrhizal fungal identity and richness determine the diversity and productivity of a tallgrass prairie system. New Phytol 172:554–562.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Wal A van der, Veen JA van, Smant W, Boschker HTS, Bloem J, Kardol P, Putten WH van der, Boer W de (2006) Fungal biomass development in a chronosequence of land abandonment. Soil Biol Biochem 38:51–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Wolfe BE, Husband BC, Klironomos JN (2005) Effects of a belowground mutualism on an aboveground mutualism. Ecology Lett 8:218–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrew Kulmatiski
    • 1
  • Paul Kardol
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Wildland Resources and the Ecology CenterUtah State UniversityLoganUSA
  2. 2.Center for Terrestrial EcologyNetherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-KNAW)HeterenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations