Graded Fuzzy Rules

  • Martina Daňková
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4529)


In this contribution, we will recall graded fuzzy rules introduced in [5] and explain the difference from the classical fuzzy rules. Moreover, properties of formulae, which are used to formalize the graded fuzzy rules, will be recalled.


Fuzzy Logic Fuzzy Rule Inference Rule Residuated Lattice Fuzzy Relation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Bandler, W., Kohout, L.: Special properties, closures and interiors of crisp and fuzzy relations. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 26, 317–331 (1988)CrossRefMathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Běhounek, L., Cintula, P.: From fuzzy logic to fuzzy mathematics: A methodological manifesto. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 157, 642–646 (2006)CrossRefMathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cintula, P.: From Fuzzy Logic to Fuzzy Mathematics. PhD thesis, Czech Technical University, Prague (2005)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Daňková, M.: Short note: On extensionality of fuzzy relations and its applications. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, submittedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Daňková, M.: On approximate reasoning with graded rules. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, to appearGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dubois, D., Lang, J., Prade, H.: Fuzzy sets in approximate reasoning, Part 2: logical approaches. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 40, 203–244 (1991)CrossRefMathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dubois, D., Prade, H.: Fuzzy sets in approximate reasoning, part 1: inference with possibility distributions. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 40, 143–202 (1991)CrossRefMathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Esteva, F., Godo, L.: Monoidal t-norm based logic: towards a logic left-continous t-norms. Fuzzy sets and systems 124, 271–288 (2001)CrossRefMathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Esteva, F., Godo, L., Hájek, P., Navara, M.: Residuated fuzzy logics with an involutive negation. Archive for Mathematical Logic 39, 103–124 (2000)CrossRefMathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Flaminio, T., Marchioni, E.: T-norm based logics with an independent involutive negation. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 157(24), 3125–3144 (2006)CrossRefMathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gottwald, S.: A Treatise on Many-Valued Logics. Studies in Logic and Computation, vol. 9. Research Studies Press, Baldock (2001)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gottwald, S.: Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Logic: Foundations of Application from a Mathematical Point of View. Vieweg, Wiesbaden (1993)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hájek, P.: Metamathematics of fuzzy logic. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1998)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Klawonn, F., Novák, V.: The relation between inference and interpolation in the framework of fuzzy systems. Fuzzy sets and systems 81, 331–354 (1996)CrossRefMathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Łukasiewicz, J.: Selected works. Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1970)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Novák, V., Lehmke, S.: Logical structure of fuzzy IF-THEN rules. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 157, 2003–2029 (2006)CrossRefMathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Novák, V.: On the logical basis of approximate reasoning. In: Novák, V., Ramík, J., Mareš, M., Černý, M., Nekola, J. (eds.) Fuzzy Approach to Reasoning and Decision Making, Kluwer, Dordrecht (1992)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Novák, V., Perfilieva, I., Močkoř, J.: Mathematical Principles of Fuzzy Logic. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1999)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Perfilieva, I.: Logical Approximation. Soft Computing 2, 73–78 (2001)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Perfilieva, I.: Logical Foundations of Rule-Based Systems. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 157, 615–621 (2006)CrossRefMathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wang, G.-J.: Formalized theory of general fuzzy reasoning. Information Sciences – Informatics and Computer Science 160, 251–266 (2004)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zadeh, L.A.: A theory of approximate reasoning. In: Hayes, J.E., Mitchie, D., Mikulich, L.I. (eds.) Machine Intelligence, vol. 9, pp. 149–194. Wiley, New York (1979)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zadeh, L.A.: Outline of a new approach to the analysis of complex systems and decision processes. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 3, 28–44 (1973)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martina Daňková
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Research and Applications of Fuzzy Modeling, University of Ostrava, 30. dubna 22Czech Republic

Personalised recommendations