Advertisement

Facing the Future: Evolutionary Possibilities for Human-Machine Creativity

  • Jon McCormack
Part of the Natural Computing Series book series (NCS)

Summary

This chapter examines the possibilities and challenges that lie ahead for evolutionary music and art. Evolutionary computing methods have enabled new modes of creative expression in the art made by humans. One day, it may be possible for computers to make art autonomously. The idea of machines making art leads to the question: what do we mean by ‘making art’ and how do we recognise and acknowledge artistic creativity in general? Two broad categories of human-machine creativity are defined: firstly, machines that make art like, and for, humans; and secondly, machines that make ‘art’ that is recognised as creative and novel by other machines or agents. Both these categories are examined from an evolutionary computing perspective. Finding ‘good’ art involves searching a phase-space of possibilities beyond astronomical proportions, which makes evolutionary algorithms potentially suitable candidates. However, the problem of developing artistically creative programs is not simply a search problem. The multiple roles of interaction, environment, physics and physicality are examined in the context of generating aesthetic output. A number of ‘open problems’ are proposed as grand challenges of investigation for evolutionary music and art. For each problem, the impetus and background are discussed. The paper also looks at theoretical issues that might limit prospects for art made by machines, in particular the role of embodiment, physicality and morphological computation in agent-based and evolutionary models. Finally, the paper looks at artistic challenges for evolutionary music and art systems.

Keywords

Pixel Image Golden Ratio Artistic Creativity Evolutionary Computing Creative Behaviour 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Dreyfus, H.L., Dreyfus, S.E., Athanasiou, T. (1986). Mind Over Machine: The Power of Human Intuition and Expertise in the Era of the Computer. Free Press. New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Whitelaw, M. (2004). Metacreation: Art and Artificial Life. MIT Press. Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cohen, H. (1995). The further exploits of Aaron, painter. Stanford Humanities Review, 4: 141–158Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cohen, H. (1999). Colouring without seeing: A problem in machine creativityGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    McCormack, J. (2005). Open problems in evolutionary music and art. In Rothlauf, F., Branke, J., Cagnoni, S., Corne, D.W., Drechsler, R., Jin, Y., Machado, P., Marchiori, E., Romero, J., Smith, G.D., Squillero, G., eds.: Applications of Evolutionary Computing, EvoWorkshops 2005: EvoBIO, EvoCOMNET, EvoHOT, EvoIASP, EvoMUSART, and EvoSTOC. Vol. 3449 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Lausanne, Switzerland. Springer, 428–436Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Carey, J. (2005). What Good are the Arts? Faber and Faber Limited. LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dissanayake, E. (1988). What is Art For? University of Washington Press. SeattleGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dissanayake, E. (1995). Homo Aestheticus: Where Art Comes From and Why. University of Washington Press. SeattleGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Miller, G.F. (2000). The Mating Mind: How Sexual Choice Shaped the Evolution of Human Nature. William Heinemann. LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Partridge, D., Rowe, J. (2002). Creativity: A computational modeling approach. In Dartnall, T., ed.: Creativity, Cognition, and Knowledge: An Interaction. Praeger, 211–238Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Humphrey, N.K. (1973). The illusion of beauty. Perception, 2: 429–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dartnall, T., ed. (2002). Creativity, Cognition, and Knowledge: An Interaction. Praeger. Westport, ConnecticutGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wolpert, D.H., Macready, W.G. (1997). No free lunch theorems for search. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 1(1): 67–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Langton, C.G. (1989). Artificial life. In Langton, C.G., ed.: Artificial Life. Vol. 6 of SFI Studies in the Sciences of Complexity. Addison-Wesley, 1–47Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pattee, H.H. (1988). Simulations, realizations, and theories of life. In Langton, C.G., ed.: Artificial Life. Vol. VI. Addison-Wesley, 63–77Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bonabeau, E.W., Theraulaz, G. (1994). Why do we need artificial life? Artificial Life, 1: 303–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dennett, D.C. (1995). Darwin’s Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life. Simon & Schuster. New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Borges, J.L. (1970). The library of babel. In Yates, D.A., Irby, J.E., eds.: Labyrinths. Penguin Books. HarmondsworthGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dennett, D.C. (1991). Real patterns. Journal of Philosophy, 88: 27–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Berlyne, D.E. (1971). Aesthetics and Psychobiology. Appleton-Century-Crofts. New York, N.Y.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Allison, L. (2002). Model Classes. Technical Report 2002/125. School of Computer Science and Software Engineering, Monash University. Clayton, Victoria, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sims, K. (1991). Artificial evolution for computer graphics. Computer Graphics, 25(4): 319–328CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Takagi, H. (2001). Interactive evolutionary computation: Fusion of the capabilities of ec optimization and human evaluation. Proceedings of the IEEE, 89: 1275–1296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dorin, A. (2001). Aesthetic fitness and artificial evolution for the selection of imagery from the mythical infinite library. In Kelemen, J., Sosík, P., eds.: Advances in Artificial Life. Vol. 2159 of LNAI. Prague. Springer, 659–668Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Eiben, A.E., Smith, J.E. (2003). Introduction to Evolutionary Computing. Natural Computing Series. SpringerGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    McCormack, J. (2002). Evolving for the audience. International Journal of Design Computing, 4 Available on-line: http://www.arch.usyd.edu.au/kcdc/journal/vol4/index.html.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kitano, H. (1990). Designing neural networks using genetic algorithms with graph generation system. Complex Systems, 4: 461–476zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Birkhoff, G.D. (1933). Aesthetic Measure. Harvard University Press. Cambridge, MAzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Scha, R., Bod, R. (1993). Computational aesthetics. Informatie en Informatiebeleid, 11: 54–63Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Elam, K. (2001). Geometry of Design: Studies in Proportion and Composition. Number 107 in Design briefs. Princeton Architectural Press. New York, N.Y.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Thompson, D.W. (1942). On Growth and Form. 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press. CambridgezbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Douady, S., Couder, Y. (1992). Phyllotaxis as a physical self-organized growth process. Phys. Rev. Lett., 68: 2098–2101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Douady, S., Couder, Y. (1996). Phyllotaxis as a dynamical self organizing process (part i, ii, iii). Journal of Theoretical Biology, 139: 178–312Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Doczi, G. (1981). The Power of Limits: Proportional Harmonies in Nature, Art and Architecture. Shambhala (Distributed by Routledge & Kegan Paul). LondonGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Bringhurst, R. (1992). The Elements of Typographic Style. Second edition edn. Hartley & Marks. Vancouver, BCGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Holger, H. (1997). Why a special issue on the golden section hypothesis?: An introduction. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 15 Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kemp, M. (2004). Divine proportion and the holy grail. Nature, 428: 370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Tufte, E.R. (2006). Beautiful Evidence. Graphics Press LLC. Cheshire, ConnecticutGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Manaris, B., Machado, P., McCauley, C., Romero, J., Krehbiel, D. (2005). Developing fitness functions for pleasant music: Zipf’s law and interactive evolution systems. In Rothlauf, F., Branke, J., Cagnoni, S., Corne, D.W., Drechsler, R., Jin, Y., Machado, P., Marchiori, E., Romero, J., Smith, G.D., Squillero, G., eds.: Applications of Evolutionary Computing, EvoWorkshops 2005: EvoBIO, EvoCOMNET, EvoHOT, EvoIASP, EvoMUSART, and EvoSTOC. Vol. 3449 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Lausanne, Switzerland. Springer, 489–507Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Taylor, R.P., Micolich, A.P., Jonas, D. (1999). Fractal analysis of Pollock’s drip paintings. Nature, 399: 422Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ramachandran, V.S., Hirstein, W. (1999). The science of art: A neurological theory of aesthetic experience. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6: 15–51Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Ramachandran, V.S. (2003). The Emerging Mind. Reith lectures. BBC in association with Profile Books. LondonGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Rooke, S. (2002). Eons of genetically evolved algorithmic images. In Bentley, P.J., Corne, D.W., eds.: Creative Evolutionary Systems. Academic Press. London, 339–365Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Wheeler, M. (2005). Reconstructing the Cognitive World: The Next Step. MIT Press. Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Pfeifer, R., Bongard, J. (2006). How the Body Shapes the Way We Think: A New View of Intelligence. MIT Press. Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Hornby, G.S., Pollack, J.B. (2001). Evolving l-systems to generate virtual creatures. Computers & Graphics, 26: 1041–1048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Sims, K. (1994). Evolving virtual creatures. In: Computer Graphics. ACM SIGGRAPH, 15–22Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Dorin, A. (2007). A survey of virtual ecosystems in generative electronic art. In Romero, J., Machado, P., eds.: The Art of Artificial Evolution. SpringerGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Taylor, T. (2002). Creativity in evolution: Individuals, interactions, and environments. In Bentley, P.J., Corne, D.W., eds.: Creative Evolutionary Systems. Academic Press. London, 79–108Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Brown, D.E. (1991). Human Universals. McGraw-Hill. New YorkGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Berlekamp, E.R., Conway, J.H., Guy, R.K. (1982). Winning Ways for your Mathematical Plays. Vol. 2. Academic Press. New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Nake, F. (1994). How far away are we from the first masterpiece of computer art? In Brunnstein, K., Raubold, E., eds.: IFIP 13th World Congress 94. Vol. 2. Elsevier Science, B.V.. North-Holland, 406–413Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Clark, A. (2003). Natural-Born cyborgs: Minds, Technologies, and the Future of Human Intelligence. Oxford University Press. New YorkGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Levin, G. (2000). Painterly Interfaces for Audiovisual Performance. Master of science thesis in media arts and sciences. MIT. BostonGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Eldridge, A.C. (2005). Cyborg dancing: Generative systems for man-machine musical improvisation. In Innocent, T., ed.: Proceedings of Third Iteration. CEMA. Melbourne, 129–141Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Packard, N.H. (1988). Intrinsic adaption in a simple model for evolution. In Langton, C.G., ed.: Artificial Life. Los Alamos, NM. Addison-Wesley, 141–155Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Partridge, D., Rowe, J. (1994). Computers and Creativity. Intellect. Oxford, EnglandGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Boden, M.A. (1994). What is creativity? In Boden, M.A., ed.: Dimensions of Creativity. MIT Press. Cambridge, MA, 75–117Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Saunders, R., Gero, J.S. (2001). Artificial creativity: A synthetic approach to the study of creative behaviour. In Gero, J.S., ed.: Proceedings of the Fifth Conference on Computational and Cognitive Models of Creative Design. Sydney. Key Centre of Design Computing and Cognition, 113–139Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Bird, J. (2004). Containing Reality: Epistemological Issues in Generative Art and Science. In: Impossible Nature: The Art of Jon McCormack. Australian Centre for the Moving Image, 40–53Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Emmeche, C., Køppe, S., Stjernfelt, F. (1997). Explaining emergence: Towards an ontology of levels. Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 28: 83–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Bedau, M.A., McCaskill, J.S., Packard, N.H., Rasmussen, S., Adami, C., Green, D., Ikegami, T., Kaneko, K., Ray, T.S. (2000). Open problems in artificial life. Artificial Life, 6: 363–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Abelson, H., DiSessa, A.A. (1982). Turtle Geometry: The Computer as a Medium for Exploring Mathematics. The MIT Press series in artificial intelligence. MIT Press. Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Bird, J., Stokes, D. (2006). Evolving minimally creative robots. In Colton, S., Pease, A., eds.: Proceedings of The Third Joint Workshop on Computational Creativity (ECAI 06), 1–5Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jon McCormack
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Electronic Media Art Monash UniversityClaytonAustralia

Personalised recommendations