Experimental Evaluation of Parametric Max-Flow Algorithms
The parametric maximum flow problem is an extension of the classical maximum flow problem in which the capacities of certain arcs are not fixed but are functions of a single parameter. Gallo et al.  showed that certain versions of the push-relabel algorithm for ordinary maximum flow can be extended to the parametric problem while only increasing the worst-case time bound by a constant factor. Recently Zhang et al. [14,13] proposed a novel, simple balancing algorithm for the parametric problem on bipartite networks. They claimed good performance for their algorithm on networks arising from a real-world application. We describe the results of an experimental study comparing the performance of the balancing algorithm, the GGT algorithm, and a simplified version of the GGT algorithm, on networks related to those of the application of Zhang et al. as well as networks designed to be hard for the balancing algorithm. Our implementation of the balancing algorithm beats both versions of the GGT algorithm on networks related to the application, thus supporting the observations of Zhang et al. On the other hand, the GGT algorithm is more robust; it beats the balancing algorithm on some natural networks, and by asymptotically increasing amount on networks designed to be hard for the balancing algorithm.
KeywordsParametric Problem Recursive Call Tabular Data Bipartite Network Source Side
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Babenko, M.A., Goldberg, A.V.: Experimental evaluation of a parametric flow algorithm. Technical report, Microsoft Research (2006)Google Scholar
- Hochbaum, D.S.: The Pseudoflow Algorithm and the Pseudoflow-Based Simplex for the Maximum Flow Problem. In: Bixby, R.E., Boyd, E.A., Ríos-Mercado, R.Z. (eds.) Integer Programming and Combinatorial Optimization. LNCS, vol. 1412, pp. 325–337. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)Google Scholar
- Zhang, B., Ward, J., Feng, Q.: Simultaneous parametric maximum flow algorithm with vertex balancing. Technical Report HPL-2005-121, HP Labs (2005)Google Scholar