Feedback Loops in Communication and Human Computing

  • Rieks op den Akker
  • Dirk Heylen
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4451)

Abstract

Building systems that are able to analyse communicative behaviours or take part in conversations requires a sound methodology in which the complex organisation of conversations is understood and tested on real-life samples. The data-driven approaches to human computing not only have a value for the engineering of systems, but can also provide feedback to the study of conversations between humans and between human and machines.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [Bavelas and Chovil, 1997]
    Bavelas, J.B., Chovil, N.: Faces in dialogue. In: Russell, J., Fernandez-Dols, J.-M. (eds.) The psychology of facial expression, pp. 334–346. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1997)Google Scholar
  2. [Buytendijk, 1964]
    Buytendijk, F.J.J.: Algemene theorie der menselijke houding en beweging (eight printing, in Dutch). Het Spectrum, Utrecht (1964)Google Scholar
  3. [Chomsky, 1965]
    Chomsky, N.: Aspects of a Theory of Syntax. MIT Press, Cambridge (1965)Google Scholar
  4. [Clark, 1996]
    Clark, H.: Using Language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1996)Google Scholar
  5. [Clark and Schaefer, 1989]
    Clark, H., Schaefer, E.: Contributing to discourse. Cognitive Science 13, 259–294 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [Duncan and Niederehe, 1974]
    Duncan, S., Niederehe, G.: On signalling that it’s your turn to speak. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 10, 234–247 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [Goffman, 1976]
    Goffman, E.: Replies and responses. Language in Society 5(3), 2257–2313 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [Goodwin, 1981]
    Goodwin, C.: Conversational Organization: Interaction between Speakers and Hearers. Academic Press, New York (1981)Google Scholar
  9. [Heylen, 2006]
    Heylen, D.: Head gestures, gaze and the principles of conversational structure. International Journal of Humanoid Robotics 3(3), 241–267 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [Heylen, 2007]
    Heylen, D.: Multimodal backchannel generation for conversational agents. In: van der Sluis, I., et al. (eds.) Workshop on Multimodal Output Generation, CTIT, University of Twente, pp. 81–91 (2007)Google Scholar
  11. [Heylen et al., 2005]
    Heylen, D., et al.: Facial signs of affect during tutoring sessions. In: Tao, J., Tan, T., Picard, R.W. (eds.) ACII 2005. LNCS, vol. 3784, pp. 24–31. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [Heylen et al., 2004]
    Heylen, D., et al.: Affective feedback in a tutoring system for procedural tasks. In: André, E., et al. (eds.) ADS 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3068, pp. 244–252. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)Google Scholar
  13. [Kendon, 1967]
    Kendon, A.: Some functions of gaze direction in social interaction. Acta Psychologica 26, 22–63 (1967)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [Kraut et al., 2003]
    Kraut, R.E., Fussell, S.R., Siegel, J.: Visual information as a conversational resource in collaborative physical tasks. Human-Computer Interaction 18, 13–49 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [McCowan et al., 2005]
    McCowan, I., et al.: The ami meeting corpus. In: Measuring Behaviour, Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Methods and Techniques in Behavioral Research (2005)Google Scholar
  16. [Montague, 1970]
    Montague, R.: English as a formal language. In: Visentini, B. (ed.) Linguaggi nella società e nella tecnica, pp. 189–224. Edizioni di Comunità, Milan (1970)Google Scholar
  17. [Nakano et al., 2003]
    Nakano, Y.I., et al.: Towards a model of face-to-face grounding. In: Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, Sapporo, July 2003, pp. 553–561. ACL (2003)Google Scholar
  18. [Pantic et al., 2007]
    Pantic, M., et al.: Machine understanding of human behavior. In: Proceedings AI for Human Computing (AI4HC’07). Workshop at IJCAI 2007, Hyderabad, India, pp. 13–24 (2007)Google Scholar
  19. [Poppe et al., 2007]
    Poppe, R., Rienks, R., Heylen, D.: Accuracy of head orientation perception in triadic situations: Experiment in a virtual environment. Perception, to appear (2007)Google Scholar
  20. [Schegloff, 1982]
    Schegloff, E.A.: Discourse as interactional achievement: Some uses of ”uh huh” and other things that come between sentences. In: Tannen, D. (ed.) Analyzing discourse, text, and talk, pp. 71–93. Georgetown University Press, Washington (1982)Google Scholar
  21. [Traum and Rickel, 2002]
    Traum, D., Rickel, J.: Embodied agents for multi-party dialogue in immersive virtual worlds. In: Alonso, E., Kudenko, D., Kazakov, D. (eds.) AAMAS 2000 and AAMAS 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2636, pp. 766–773. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rieks op den Akker
    • 1
  • Dirk Heylen
    • 1
  1. 1.Human Media Interaction Group, University of Twente, PO Box 217, 7500 AE EnschedeThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations