Towards a Digital Content Services Design Based on Triple Space

  • David de Francisco
  • Noelia Pérez
  • Doug Foxvog
  • Andreas Harth
  • Daniel Martin
  • Daniel Wutke
  • Martin Murth
  • Elena Paslaru Bontas Simperl
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4439)

Abstract

Digital Asset Management is an emerging business for tele- communication companies, especially when applied to the entertainment market. Current implementations try to overcome the integration needs from each actor participating in the business processes by using Enterprise Application Integration. Triple Space is a space-based communication infrastructure which provides semantic mediation between actors involved in a dialogue.

This paper presents a Digital Asset Management use case in which Triple Space will be applied to fulfill the inherent needs of this business domain through the use of this new semantic communication paradigm.

Keywords

Triple Space Digital Asset Management Enterprise Application Integration Space-based Computing 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Altman, E., Goyal, S., Sahu, S.: A digital media asset ecosystem for the global film industry. Journal of Digital Asset Management 2, 6–16 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Astley, M., et al.: Achieving Scalability and Throughput in a Publish/Subscribe System. IBM Research Report RC23103 (W0402-026) (February 2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Berge, J.: The EDIFACT standards. NCC Blackwell, Manchester (1991)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bussler, C.: The role of semantic web technology in eai. Bulletin of the IEEE Computer Society Technical Committee on Data Engineering 26, 62–68 (2003)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ciancarini, P., et al.: Redesigning the Web: From Passive Pages to Coordinated Agents in PageSpaces. In: Proceedings of 3rd IEEE International Symposium on Autonomous Decentralized Systems ISADS, pp. 337–384 (1997)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Coral Consortium. Coral consortium whitepaper (February 2006), http://www.coral-interop.org/main/news/Coral.whitepaper.pdf
  7. 7.
    de Bruijn, J., et al.: Using the web service modeling ontology to enable semantic e-business. Commun. ACM 48(12), 43–47 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fensel, D.: Ontologies: A Silver Bullet for Knowledge Management and Electronic Commerce. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)MATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fensel, D.: Triple space computing: Semantic web services based on persistent publication of information. In: Proceedings of IFIP International Conference on Intelligence in Communication Systems (2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tele Management Forum. Enhanced Telecom Operations Map (eTOM): the business process framework. Release 5.0 (2005)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gelernter, D.: Generative Communication in Linda. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems 7(1), 80–112 (1985)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hohpe, G., Woolf, B.: Enterprise Integration Patterns: Designing, Building, and Deploying Messaging Solutions. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2003)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kalfoglou, Y., Schorlemmer, M.: Ontology mapping: the state of the art. Knowledge Engineering Review 18(1), 1–31 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Krummenacher, R., et al.: WWW or What is Wrong is with Web Services. In: Löwe, W., Martin-Flatin, J.-P. (eds.) Proc. 3rd European Conf. on Web Services, November 2005, pp. 235–243. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2005)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Larose, G.: DAM and interoperable DRM: Maintaining agility in the world of evolving content ecosystems. Journal of Digital Asset Management 2, 17–25 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Leymann, F.: Space-based Computing and Semantics: A Web Service Purist’s Point-Of-View. Technical Report Fakultätsbericht Nr. 2006/05, Universität Stuttgart, Fakultät Informatik, Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik (March 2006)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Leymann, F., Roller, D.: Production Workflow. Prentice Hall PTR, Englewood Cliffs (2002)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Linthicum, D.: Enterprise Application Integration. Addison-Wesley Professional, Reading (1999)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., Lassila, O.: The semanticweb. Scientific American 5, 34–43 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Uhl, A., Pommer, A.: Image And Video Encryption - From Digital Rights Management To Secured Personal Communication. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)MATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wache, H., et al.: Ontology-based integration of information - a survey of existing approaches. In: Proceedings of the IJCAI-01 Workshop: Ontologies and Information Sharing, pp. 108–117 (2001)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Weerawarana, S., et al.: Web Services Platform Architecture: SOAP, WSDL, WS-Policy, WS-Addressing, WS-BPEL, WS-Reliable Messaging, and More. Prentice Hall PTR, Englewood Cliffs (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • David de Francisco
    • 1
  • Noelia Pérez
    • 1
  • Doug Foxvog
    • 2
  • Andreas Harth
    • 2
  • Daniel Martin
    • 3
  • Daniel Wutke
    • 3
  • Martin Murth
    • 4
  • Elena Paslaru Bontas Simperl
    • 5
  1. 1.Telefónica Investigación y Desarrollo 
  2. 2.DERI, National University of Ireland, Galway 
  3. 3.University of Stuttgart 
  4. 4.Vienna University of Technology 
  5. 5.Free University of Berlin 

Personalised recommendations