Algebraic Semantics of Service Component Modules

  • José Luiz Fiadeiro
  • Antónia Lopes
  • Laura Bocchi
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4409)

Abstract

We present a notion of module acquired from developing an algebraic framework for service-oriented modelling. More specifically, we give an account of the notion of module that supports the composition model of the SENSORIA Reference Modelling Language (SRML). The proposed notion is independent of the logic in which properties are expressed and components are programmed. Modules in SRML are inspired in concepts proposed for Service Component Architecture (SCA) and Web Services, as well the modules that have been proposed for Algebraic Specifications, namely by H. Ehrig and F. Orejas, among others; they include interfaces for required (imported) and provided (exported) services, as well as a number of components (body) whose orchestrations ensure how given behavioural properties of the provided services are guaranteed assuming that the requested services satisfy required properties.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    de Alfaro, L., Henzinger, T.: Interface automata. In: ESEC/SIGSOFT_FSE, pp. 109–120. ACM Press, New York (2001)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baumeister, H., Hacklinger, F., Hennicker, R., Knapp, A., Wirsing, M.: A component model for architectural programming. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science (to appear, 2005)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ehrig, H., Mahr, B.: Fundamentals of Algebraic Specification 2: Module Specifications and Constraints. In: EATCS Monographs on Theoretical Computer Science, vol. 21, Springer, Heidelberg (1990)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ehrig, H., Orejas, F., Braatz, B., Klein, M., Piirainen, M.: A component framework for system modeling based on high-level replacement systems. Software Systems Modeling 3, 114–135 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fiadeiro, J.L.: Categories for Software Engineering. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fiadeiro, J.L., Lopes, A., Bocchi, L.: The SENSORIA Reference Modelling Language: Primitives for Service Description and Composition (2006), Available from, http://www.sensoria-ist.eu
  7. 7.
    Fiadeiro, J.L., Lopes, A., Bocchi, L.: A formal approach to service-oriented architecture. In: Bravetti, M., Núñez, M., Zavattaro, G. (eds.) WS-FM 2006. LNCS, vol. 4184, pp. 193–213. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gnesi, S., Mazzanti, F.: A model checking verification environment for UML Statecharts. In: Proceedings of XLIII Congresso Annuale AICA "Comunita’ Virtuale dalla Ricerca all’Impresa dalla Formazione al Cittadino", University of Udine – AICA (2005), paper available from, fmt.isti.cnr.it
  9. 9.
    Goguen, J., Burstall, R.: Institutions: abstract model theory for specification and programming. Journal ACM 39(1), 95–146 (1992)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Consortium, S.C.A.: Building Systems using a Service Oriented Architecture (2005), Whitepaper available from, http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/library/specification/ws-sca, (version 0.9)

Copyright information

© Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • José Luiz Fiadeiro
    • 1
  • Antónia Lopes
    • 2
  • Laura Bocchi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer Science, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester LE1 7RHUK
  2. 2.Department of Informatics, Faculty of Sciences, University of Lisbon, Campo Grande, 1749-016 LisboaPortugal

Personalised recommendations