Imaging Pelvic Floor Disorders pp 89-100
MRI of the Levator Ani Muscle
One suggested rationale for using MR imaging to evaluate urinary incontinence and pelvic floor dysfunction derives from the observation that patients might present with symptoms isolated to one pelvic compartment, but may have concomitant defects in other compartments (Maglinte et al. 1999). Accurate diagnosis of coexisting abnormalities is essential in planning reconstructive pelvic floor and antiincontinence surgery. Some authors have suggested that surgical failures result from the lack of thorough preoperative diagnosis and inadequate staging of pelvic floor dysfunction (Safir et al. 1999).
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Halban J, Tandler J (1907) Anatomie und Aetiologie der Genitalprolapse beim Weibe. Wilhelm Braumueller, Vienna, LeipzigGoogle Scholar
- Kelvin FM, Maglinte DD (1997) Dynamic cystoproctography of female pelvic floor defects and their interrelationships. Am J Roentgenol 169:769–774Google Scholar
- Kelvin FM, Hale OS, Maglinte DO, Patten BJ, Benson JT (1999) Female pelvic organ prolapse: diagnostic contribution of dynamic cystoproctograph and comparison with physical examination. Am J Roentgenol 173:31–37Google Scholar
- Maglinte DD, Kelvin FM, Fitzgerald K, Hale DS, Benson JT (1999) Association of compartment defects in pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Roentgenol 172:439–444Google Scholar
- Safir MH, Gousse AE, Rovner ES, Ginsberg DA, Raz S (1999) Four defect repair of grade 4 cystocele. J Urol 16:587–594Google Scholar
- Terminologia Anatomica (1998) International anatomical terminology/Federative Committee on Anatomical Terminology (FCAT). Theime, Stuttgart, New YorkGoogle Scholar