Curve, Draft, and Style: Three Steps to the Image

  • Olgierd Unold
  • Maciej Troc
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4448)


This paper introduces a new evolutionary model of the art and design process. The whole process of interactive image creating was decomposed into three steps: evolving the Bezier curve, evolving the geometric transformations of the curve, and evolving the style of painting it. A model was implemented, and a series of promising experiments was performed.


Evolutionary art Interactive evolution Bezier curve 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Baluja, S., Pomerlau, D., Todd, J.: Towards Automated Artificial Evolution for Computer-Generated Images. Connection Science 6(2/3), 325–354 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barrow, J.D.: The Artful Universe. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1995)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dawkins, R.: The Blind Watchmaker. W.W. Norton & Company Inc. New York (1987)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Machado, P., Cardoso, A.: Model Proposal for a Constructed Artist. In: Callaos, N. et al.: (eds.) In: Proc. SCI’97/ISAS’97. Caracas, vol II, pp. 521–528 (1997)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Machado, P., Cardoso, A.: NEvAr - The Assessment of an Evolutionary Art Tool. In: Wiggins G (ed.) Proc. AISB’00, Birmingham (2000) Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Michalewicz, Z.: Genetic Algorithms + Data Structure = Evolution Programs. Springer Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg New York (1996)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Romero, J., Machado, P., Santos, A., Cardoso, A.: On the Development of Critics in Evolutionary Computation Artists. In: Raidl, G.R., Cagnoni, S., Cardalda, J.J.R., Corne, D.W., Gottlieb, J., Guillot, A., Hart, E., Johnson, C.G., Marchiori, E., Meyer, J.-A., Middendorf, M. (eds.) EvoIASP 2003, EvoWorkshops 2003, EvoSTIM 2003, EvoROB/EvoRobot 2003, EvoCOP 2003, EvoBIO 2003, and EvoMUSART 2003. LNCS, vol. 2611, pp. 559–569. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Saunders, R., Gero, J.: The Digital Clockwork Muse: A Computational Model of Aesthetic Evolution. In: Wiggins, G., (ed.) In: Proc. AISB’01, York UK, pp. 12–21 (2001)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sims, K.: Artificial Evolution for Computer Graphics. Computer Graphics 25(4), 319–328 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Svangard, N., Nordin, P.: Automated Aesthetic Selection of Evolutionary Art by Distance Based Classification of Genomes and Phenomes Using the Universal Similarity Metric. In: Raidl, G.R., Cagnoni, S., Branke, J., Corne, D.W., Drechsler, R., Jin, Y., Johnson, C.G., Machado, P., Marchiori, E., Rothlauf, F., Smith, G.D., Squillero, G. (eds.) EvoWorkshops 2004. LNCS, vol. 3005, pp. 447–456. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Todd, J., Latham, W.: Mutator, a Subjective Human Interface for Evolution of Computer Sculptures. IBM United Kingdom Scientific Centre Report 248 (1991)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Van Hermet, J.I., Eiben, A.E.: Mondriaan Art by Evolution. In: Postma, E., Gyssens, M. (eds.) Proc. BNAIC’99, pp. 291–292 (1999)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Olgierd Unold
    • 1
  • Maciej Troc
    • 1
  1. 1.The Institute of Computer Engineering, Control and Robotics, Wroclaw University of Technology, Wyb. Wyspianskiego 27, 50-370 WroclawPoland

Personalised recommendations