Verification of Common 802.11 MAC Model Assumptions

  • David Malone
  • Ian Dangerfield
  • Doug Leith
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4427)


There has been considerable success in analytic modeling of the 802.11 MAC layer. These models are based on a number of fundamental assumptions. In this paper we attempt to verify these assumptions by taking careful measurements using an 802.11e testbed with commodity hardware. We show that the assumptions do not always hold but our measurements offer insight as to why the models may still produce good predictions. To our knowledge, this is the first in-detail attempt to compare 802.11 models and their assumptions with experimental measurements from an 802.11 testbed. The measurements collect also allow us to test if the basic MAC operation adhere to the 802.11 standards.


Collision Probability Distribute Coordination Function Transmission Attempt Experimental Testbed IEEE JSAC 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Battiti, R., Li, B.: Supporting service differentiation with enhancements of the IEEE 802.11 MAC protocol: models and analysis. Technical Report DIT-03-024, University of Trento (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bianchi, G.: Performance analysis of IEEE 802.11 Distributed Coordination Function. IEEE JSAC 18(3), 535–547 (2000)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cali, F., Conti, M., Gregori, E.: IEEE 802.11 wireless LAN: Capacity analysis and protocol enhancement. In: Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM, San Francisco, USA, pp. 142–149. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (1998)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Clifford, P., Duffy, K., Foy, J., Leith, D.J., Malone, D.: Modeling 802.11e for data traffic parameter design. In: WiOpt (2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dangerfield, I., Malone, D., Leith, D.J.: Experimental evaluation of 802.11e edca for enhanced voice over wlan performance. In: International Workshop On Wireless Network Measurement (WiNMee) (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Engelstad, P.: Queueing delay analysis of IEEE 802.11e EDCA. In: IFIP WONS (2006)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Soekris Engineering.
  8. 8.
    Multiband Atheros Driver for WiFi (MADWiFi)., r1645 version
  9. 9.
    Kong, Z., Tsang, D.H.K., Bensaou, B., Gao, D.: Performance analysis of IEEE 802.11e contention-based channel access. IEEE JSAC 22(10), 2095–2106 (2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Malone, D., Duffy, K., Leith, D.J.: Modeling the 802.11 Distributed Coordination Function in non-saturated heterogeneous conditions. To appear in IEEE ACM T NETWORK (2007)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Robinson, J.W., Randhawa, T.S.: Saturation throughput analysis of IEEE 802.11e Enhanced Distributed Coordination Function. IEEE JSAC 22(5), 917–928 (2004)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Di Stefano, A, Terrazzino, G., Scalia, L., Tinnirello, I., Bianchi, G., Giaconia, C.: An experimental testbed and methodology for characterizing IEEE 802.11 network cards. In: International Symposium on a World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks (WoWMoM) (2006)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tinnirello, I., Bianchi, G.: On the accuracy of some common modeling assumptions for EDCA analysis. In: International Conference on Cybernetics and Information Technologies, Systems and Applications (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Malone
    • 1
  • Ian Dangerfield
    • 1
  • Doug Leith
    • 1
  1. 1.Hamilton Institute, NUI MaynoothIreland

Personalised recommendations