A Validation Framework for Formal Models in Adaptive Work-Integrated Learning

  • Barbara Kump
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5149)

Abstract

The focus of my thesis is on the development of a multi-method framework for the validation of formal models (domain model, user model, and teaching model) for adaptive work-integrated learning. In order to test its general applicability, the framework will be applied in four different realistic work domains. In this article, specific challenges of traditional validating approaches in work-integrated learning are being discussed. Eventually, the core ideas and methods of the validation framework are outlined.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    De Bra, P., Houben, G., Wu, H.: AHAM: A Dexter-based Reference Model for Adaptive Hypermedia. In: Proceedings of the tenth ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia, pp. 147–156 (1999)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brusilovsky, P.: Methods and techniques of adaptive hypermedia. User Modeling and User Adapted Interaction 6(2-3), 87–129 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Korossy, K.: Extending the theory of knowledge spaces: A competence-performance approach. Zeitschrift für Psychologie 205, 53–82 (1997)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Doignon, J., Falmagne, J.: Knowledge Spaces. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)MATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    ALEKS Corp.: ALEKS - A Better State of Knowledge, http://www.aleks.com
  6. 6.
    Hockemeyer, C., Conlan, O., Wade, V., Albert, D.: Applying Competence Prerequisite Structures for eLearning and Skill Management. Journal of Universal Computer Science 9(12), 1428–1436 (2003)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Albert, D., Lukas, J. (eds.): Knowledge Spaces: Theories, Empirical Research, and Applications. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (1999)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Falmagne, J., Doignon, J., Koppen, M., Villano, M., Johannesen, L.: Introduction to Knowledge Spaces: How to Build, Test, and Search Them. Psychological Review 97(2), 201–224 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Baumunk, K., Dowling, C.: Validity of Spaces for Assessing Knowledge about Fractions. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 41, 99–105 (1997)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kambouri, M., Koppen, M., Villano, M., Falmagne, J.: Knowledge assessment: tapping human expertise by the QUERY routine. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 40, 119–151 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ley, T.: Organizational Competency Management - A Competence Performance Approach. Shaker, Aachen (2006)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ley, T., Albert, D.: Identifying Employee Competencies in Dynamic Work Domains: Methodological Considerations and a Case Study. Journal of Universal Computer Science 9(12), 1500–1518 (2003)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Barbara Kump
    • 1
  1. 1.Knowledge Management InstituteTU GrazGraz 

Personalised recommendations