Impediments to Wildlife Disease Surveillance, Research, and Diagnostics
There is a recognized need for increased wildlife disease surveillance and research related to understanding the epidemiology and control of emerging wildlife and zoonotic diseases. Although both passive and active surveillance strategies can and have been effectively used with wildlife, some unique problems are often encountered. These can include limitations related to case acquisition and under-reporting, difficulty in designing sampling strategies that adequately represent the population of interest, the lack of properly validated diagnostic tests, problems related to data interpretation due to missing or inaccurate denominator data, and the lack of an existing wildlife surveillance infrastructure. Many of these same problems are often encountered in field research, which can be further complicated by the complexity and scale of the natural systems in which this work takes place. Although such studies may be difficult, there are numerous examples of success and our understanding of wildlife and wildlife-related zoonotic and emerging disease continues to grow.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Allison AB, Mead DG, Gibbs SEJ, Hoffman DM, Stallknecht DE (2004) West Nile virus viremia in wild rock pigeons. Emerg Infect Dise 10:2252–2255.Google Scholar
- Berger L, Speare R, Daszak P, Green DE, Cunningham AA, Goggin CL, Slocombe R, Ragan MA, Hyatt AD, McDonald KR, Hines HB, Lips KR, Marantelli G, Parks H (1998) Chytridiomycosis causes amphibian mortality associated with population declines in the rain forests of Australia and Central America. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95:9031–9036.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Berringer J, Hanson LP, Stallknecht DE (2000) An epizootic of hemorrhagic disease in white-tailed deer in Missouri. J Wildl Dis 36:588–591.Google Scholar
- Caffrey C, Peterson CC (2003) West Nile virus may not be a conservation issue in the northeastern United States. American Birds (103rd Christmas Bird Count). 14–21.Google Scholar
- Hochachka WM, Dhondt AA, McGowan KG, Kramer LD (2004) Impact of West Nile virus on American crows in the northeastern United States, and its relevance to existing monitoring programs. Ecol Health 1:60–68.Google Scholar
- Ksiazek TG, Peters CJ, Rollin PE, Zaki S, Nichol S, Spiropoulou C, Morzunov S, Feldmann H, Sanchez A, Khan AS, Mahy BWJ, Wachsmuth K, Butler JC (1995) Identification of a new North American hantavirus that causes acute pulmonary insufficiency. Am J Trop Med and Hygiene 52:117–123.Google Scholar
- Stallknecht DE (1997) Ecology and epidemiology of avian influenza viruses in wild bird populations: Waterfowl, shorbirds, pelicans, cormorants, etc. Proceedings of the fourth international symposium on avian Influenza. pp 61–69.Google Scholar
- Steele KE, Linn MJ, Schhoepp RJ, Komar N, Geisbert TW, Manduca RM, Calle PP, Raphael BL, Clippinger TL, Larson T, Smith J, Lanciotti RS, Panella NA, McNamara TS (2000) Pathology of fatal West Nile virus infections in native and exotic birds during the 1999 outbreak in New York City New York. Vet Pathol 37:208–224.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stutzenbaker CD, Brown K, Lobpries D (1986) Special Report: an assessment of the accuracy of documenting waterfowl die-offs in a Texas coastal marsh. In: Feierabend JS, Russel AB (eds) Lead poisoning in wild waterfowl. National Wildlife Federation, Washington, DC, pp 88–95.Google Scholar
- Thurmond MC (2003) Conceptual foundations for infectious disease surveillance. Journal of Veterinary Diagn Invest 15:501–514.Google Scholar
- Toma B, Vaillancourt J-P, Dufour B, Eloit M, Moutou F, Marsh W, Benet JJ, Sanaa M, and Michel P (1999) Dictionary of Veterinary Epidemiology Iowa State University Press Ames.Google Scholar
- Wobeser GA (1994) Investigation and management of disease in wild animals. Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar