Affordances and Cognitive Walkthrough for Analyzing Human-Virtual Human Interaction

  • Zsófia Ruttkay
  • Rieks op den Akker
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5042)

Abstract

This study investigates how the psychological notion of affordance, known from human computer interface design, can be adopted for the analysis and design of communication of a user with a Virtual Human (VH), as a novel interface. We take as starting point the original notion of affordance, used to describe the function of objects for humans. Then, we dwell on the human-computer interaction case when the object used by the human is (a piece of software in) the computer. In the next step, we look at human-human communication and identify actual and perceived affordances of the human body and mind. Then using the generic framework of affordances, we explain certain essential phenomena of human-human multimodal communication. Finally, we show how they carry over to the case of communicating with a ’designed human’, that is an VH, whose human-like communication means may be augmented with ones reminiscent of the computer and fictive worlds. In the closing section we discuss and reformulate the method of cognitive walkthrough to make it applicable for evaluating the design of verbal and non-verbal interactive behaviour of VHs.

Keywords

Affordance theory virtual humans embodied conversational agents cognitive walkthrough HCI 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Cassell, J., Sullivan, J., Prevost, S., Churchill, E. (eds.): Embodied Conversational Agents. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cassell, J., Bickmore, T.W., Vilhjálmsson, H.H., Yan, H.: More than just a pretty face: affordances of embodiment. In: Proc. of Intelligent User Interfaces, pp. 52–59 (2000)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cornwell, J., O’Brien, K., Silverman, B.G., Toth, J.: Affordance theory for improving the rapid generation, composability, and reusability of synthetic agents and objects. In: Proc. of 12th Conf. on Behavior Representation in Modeling and Simulation (2003)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dennett, D.C.: True believers: The intentional strategy and why it works. In: Heath, A.F. (ed.) Scientific Explanations: Papers based on Herbert Spencer Lectures Given in the University of Oxford, Reprinted in The Nature of Consciousness (David Rosenthal, ed.) (1981)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dennett, D.C.: The Intentional Stance. MIT Press, Cambridge (1987)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dix, A., Finlay, J., Abowd, G., Beale, R.: Human Computer Interaction. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (2004)MATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gaver, W.: Affordances for interaction: The social is material for design. Ecological Psychology 8(2), 112–129 (1996)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gibson, J.J.: The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton, Mifflin, Boston (1979), http://www.alamut.com/notebooks/a/affordances.html
  9. 9.
    Personal communication at the AAMAS 2004 ws ‘Balanced Perception and Action in ECAs’ (2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    McGrenere, J., Ho, W.: Affordance: Clarifying and Evolving a Concept. In: Proceedings of Graphics Interface, Montreal, Canada, pp. 179–186 (2000)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Murphy, R.R.: Case studies of applying Gibson’s ecological approach to mobile robots. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part A 29(1), 105–111 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Norman, D.: The psychology of everyday things, Basic Books, New York(1988), http://www.jnd.org/dn.mss/affordances_and_desi.html
  13. 13.
    Peters, C., Pelachaud, C., Bevacqua, E., Mancini, M.: Engagement Capabilities of ECAs. In: AAMAS 2005 Ws on Creating Bonds with ECAs, Utrecht (2005)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ruttkay, Zs., Pelachaud, C. (eds.): From Brows to Trust: Evaluating Embodied Conversational Agents. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2004)MATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Reeves, B., Nass, C.: The Media Equation. How People Treat Computers, Television and New Media Like Real People and Places. CSLI Publication Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ruttkay, Zs., Ten Hagen, P.: Reactive Monologues Modeling Refinement and Variations of Interaction Protocols of ECAs. In: Proc. of AAMAS 2004, Workshop on Balanced Perception and Action in ECAs, New York (2004)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Thórisson, K.R.: Natural Turn-Taking Needs No Manual. In: Granström, B., House, D., Karlsson, I. (eds.) Multimodality in Language and Speech Systems, pp. 173–207. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Whittaker, S.: Theories and Methods in Mediated Communication. In: Graesser, A., Gernsbacher, M., Goldman, S. (eds.) The Handbook of Discourse Processes, pp. 243–286. Erlbaum, NJ (2002)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zsófia Ruttkay
    • 1
    • 2
  • Rieks op den Akker
    • 1
  1. 1.HMIUniversity of TwenteThe Netherlands
  2. 2.ITKPázmány Péter Catholic UniversityHungary

Personalised recommendations