EPR-Problem (Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Problem)

  • Peter Mittelstaedt

In 1935, Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen published a paper [1] in which they tried to show that the quantum-mechanical description of physical reality is not complete. For the demonstration of this result, the authors made use of two assumptions, the principle of reality (R) and the principle of ► locality (L). These assumptions read:

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature

  1. 1.
    A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, N. Rosen: Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete? Phys. Rev. 47, 777–780 (1935)MATHCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    D. Bohm, Y. Aharonov: Discussion of Experimental Proof for the Paradox of Einstein, Rosen and Podolsky. Phys. Rev. 108, 1070–1076 (1957)CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    B. d'Espagnat: Veiled Reality (Westview Press, Cambridge 2003, 105)MATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    J. S. Bell: On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox. Physics 1, 195–200 (1964)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    P. Mittelstaedt: Einsteins Objections Against Quantum Mechanics. Phys. Philos. Open Access Online Journal, http://physphil.uni-dortmund.de, 1–15 (2006)
  6. 6.
    A. Aspect et al.: Experimetal Tests of Bell's Inequalities Using Time-Varying Analysers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1804–1807 (1982)CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    G. Weihs: Violation of Bell's Inequality Under Strict Einstein Locality Conditions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5039–5043 (1998)MATHCrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Mittelstaedt

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations