EPR-Problem (Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Problem)

  • Peter Mittelstaedt

In 1935, Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen published a paper [1] in which they tried to show that the quantum-mechanical description of physical reality is not complete. For the demonstration of this result, the authors made use of two assumptions, the principle of reality (R) and the principle of ► locality (L). These assumptions read:


Physical Reality Compound System Spin Observable Longe Interact Composite Quantum System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, N. Rosen: Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete? Phys. Rev. 47, 777–780 (1935)MATHCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    D. Bohm, Y. Aharonov: Discussion of Experimental Proof for the Paradox of Einstein, Rosen and Podolsky. Phys. Rev. 108, 1070–1076 (1957)CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    B. d'Espagnat: Veiled Reality (Westview Press, Cambridge 2003, 105)MATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    J. S. Bell: On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox. Physics 1, 195–200 (1964)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    P. Mittelstaedt: Einsteins Objections Against Quantum Mechanics. Phys. Philos. Open Access Online Journal, http://physphil.uni-dortmund.de, 1–15 (2006)
  6. 6.
    A. Aspect et al.: Experimetal Tests of Bell's Inequalities Using Time-Varying Analysers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1804–1807 (1982)CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    G. Weihs: Violation of Bell's Inequality Under Strict Einstein Locality Conditions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5039–5043 (1998)MATHCrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Mittelstaedt

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations