Skip to main content

Which-Way or Welcher-Weg-Experiments

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 354 Accesses

The issue of the ► wave-particle duality of light and matter is commonly illustrated by the ► double-slit experiment, in which a quantum object of relatively well defined momentum (such as a photon, electron, neutron, atom, or molecule) is sent through a diaphragm containing two slits, after which it is detected at a capture screen. It is found that an interference pattern characteristic of wave behaviour emerges as a large number of similarly prepared quantum objects is detected on the screen. This is taken as evidence that it is impossible to ascertain through which slit an individual quantum object has passed; if that were known in every individual case and if the quantum objects behaved as free classical particles otherwise, an interference pattern would not arise.

The notion that a description of atomic objects in terms of definite classical particle trajectories is not in general admissible is prominent in Werner Heisenberg's seminal paper [1] of 1927 on the ► Heisenberg uncertainty principle; there he notes: “I believe that one can fruitfully formulate the origin of the classical ‘orbit’ in this way: the ‘orbit’ comes into being only when we observe it.” In the same year, in his famous Como lecture, Niels Bohr introduced the ► complementarity principle, which entails that definite particle trajectories cannot be defined or observed for atomic objects because according to it their spatiotemporal and causal descriptions are mutually exclusive [2]. Bohr cited the uncertainty relation as a symbolic expression of complementarity but recognized that this relation also offered room for approximately defined simultaneous values of position and momentum. Still in the same year, at the 1927 Solvay conference, Albert Einstein questioned the impossibility of determining the path taken by an individual particle in a double-slit interference experiment [21]; he proposed an experimental scheme wherein he considered it possible to infer through which slit the particle passed, without thereby destroying the interference pattern by measuring the recoil of the double-slitted diaphragm. This was the first instance of a welcher-weg or which-way experiment. As Bohr reported in his 1949 tribute to Einstein [3], he was able to demonstrate that Einstein's proposal was in conflict with the principles of quantum mechanics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Primary Literature

  1. Heisenberg, W.: Ü ber den anschaulichen Inhalt der quantentheoretischen Kinematik und Mechanik. Zeitschrift für Physik 43, 172–198 (1927). The quotation is taken from the English translation in [20].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bohr, N.: The quantum postulate and the recent development of atomic theory. Nature 121, 580–590 (1928).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bohr, N.: Discussion with Einstein on Epistemological Problems in Atomic Physics, in Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist, ed. P. Schilpp (Library of Living Philosophers, Evanston, 1949).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wootters, W.K./Zurek, W.H.: Complementarity in the double-slit experiment: Quantum non-separability and a quantitative statement of Bohr's principle. Physical Review D 19, 473–484 (1979).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wheeler, J.A.: The past and the delayed-choice double-slit experiment, in Marlow, A.R. (ed.), Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Theory (Academic Press, New York, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jacques, V./Wu, E./Grosshans, F./Treussart, F./Grangier, P./Aspect, A./Roch, J.-F.: Experimental realization of Wheelers delayed-choice GedankenExperiment, arxiv:quant-ph/0610241 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Deutsch, D.: Uncertainty in Quantum Measurements. Physical Review Letters 50, 631–633 (1983).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Mittelstaedt, P./Prieur, A./Schieder, R.: Unsharp particle-wave duality in a photon split beam experiment. Foundations of Physics 17, 891–903 (1987).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Greenberger, D.M./Yasin, A.: Simultaneous wave and particle knowledge in a neutron interferometer. Physics Letters A 128, 391–394 (1988).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Scully, M.O./Englert, B.-G./Walther, H.: Quantum optical tests of complementarity. Nature 351, 111–116 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Scully, M.O./Drühl, K.: Quantum eraser — A proposed photon correlation experiment concerning observation and delayed choice in quantum mechanics. Physical Review A 25, 2208–2213 (1982).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim, Y.-H./Yu, R./Kulik, S.P./Shi, Y./Scully, M.O.: Delayed ‘Choice’ Quantum Eraser. Physical Review Letters 84, 1–5 (2000).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wheeler, J. A.: Law without law, in Wheeler, J.A./Zurek, W.H. (eds.), Quantum Theory and Measurement (Princeton, New Jersey, 1983, pp. 182–213).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Scully, M.: Quantum Optics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997, Section 20.1).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Dürr, S./Nonn, T./Rempe, G.: Origin of quantum-mechanical complementarity probed by a ‘which-way’ experiment in an atom interferometer. Nature 395, 33–37 (1998).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Jaeger, G./Shimony, A./Vaidman, L.: Two interferometric complementarities. Physical Review A 51, 54–67 (1995).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Englert, B.-G.: Fringe Visibility and which-way information: An inequality. Physical Review Letters 77, 2154–2157 (1996).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Englert, B.-G./Bergou, J.A.: Quantitative quantum erasure. Optics Communications 179, 337–355 (2000).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Vigier, J.-P. /Rauch, H.: Proposed neutron interferometry test of Einstein's ‘Einweg’ assumption in the Bohr-Einstein controversy. Physics Letters A 151, 269–275 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Secondary Literature

  1. Wheeler, J.A./Zurek, W.H. (eds.), Quantum theory and measurement (Princeton, New Jersey, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bacciagaluppi, G./Valentini, A.: Quantum mechanics at the crossroads: Reconsidering the 1927 Solvay Conference (Cambridge University Press, UK, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Feynman, R./Leighton, R./Sands, M.: The Feynman Lectures on Physics Vol. III (Addison Wesley, 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Busch, P./Shilladay, C.R.: Complementarity and uncertainty in Mach-Zehnder interferometry and beyond. Physics Reports 435, 1–31 (2006).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Rauch, H./Werner, S.: Neutron interferometry (Oxford, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Falkenburg, B.: Particle Metaphysics — A Critical Account of Subatomic Reality (Springer 2007, Sec. 7.4 and 7.5.).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Busch, P., Jaeger, G. (2009). Which-Way or Welcher-Weg-Experiments. In: Greenberger, D., Hentschel, K., Weinert, F. (eds) Compendium of Quantum Physics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70626-7_237

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70626-7_237

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-70622-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-70626-7

  • eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics