Advertisement

Knowledge Acquisition Focused Cooperative Development of Bio-ontologies – A Case Study with BIO2Me

  • Dominic Mainz
  • Ingo Paulsen
  • Indra Mainz
  • Katrin Weller
  • Jochen Kohl
  • Arndt von Haeseler
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 13)

Abstract

We diagnose the need for collaborative ontology engineering approaches exemplified by the life sciences. With BIO2Me we present our case study, a structured knowledge base in the field of bioinformatics tools and methods. We point out the difficulties in knowledge elicitation and concerning the cooperation of domain experts and ontology designers we experienced during the engineering process of our ontology. Finally, we demonstrate our solutions for an ontology developing environment by discussing some aspects such as publication relevant tagging and semantically binding wiki pages with ontologies to integrate domain experts into the ontology development process.

Keywords

Domain Expert Bioinformatics Tool Ontology Development Knowledge Elicitation Ontology Designer 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Gruber, T.R.: A Translation Approach to Portable Ontologies. Knowledge Acquisition 5(2), 199–220 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    McGuinness, D., van Harmelen, F.: OWL Web Ontology Language Overview. W3C Recommendation (2004), http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/ (retrieved January 10, 2008)
  3. 3.
    Larkin, M.A., Blackshields, G., Brown, N.P., Chenna, R., McGettigan, P.A., McWilliam, H., Valentin, F., Wallace, I.M., Wilm, A., Lopez, R., Thompson, J.D., Gibson, T.J., Higgins, D.G.: ClustalW2 and ClustalX Version 2. Bioinformatics 23(21), 2947–2948 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Goble, C., Corcho, O., Alper, P., De Roure, D.: E-Science and the Semantic Web: A Symbiotic Relationship. In: Todorovski, L., Lavrač, N., Jantke, K.P. (eds.) DS 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4265, pp. 1–12. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hey, T., Trefethen, A.: Cyberinfrastructures for e-Science. Science 308, 817–821 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., Lassila, O.: The Semantic Web. Scientific American, 28–37 (2001)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Corcho, O., Alper, P., Kotsiopoulos, I., Missier, P., Bechhofer, S., Goble, C.: An overview of S-OGSA. A Reference Semantic Grid Architecture. Journal of Web Semantics 4(2), 102–115 (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gruber, T.: Ontology of Folksonomy. A Mash-Up of Apples and Oranges. In: 1st On-Line Conference on Metadata and Semantics Research (MTSR 2005) (2005), http://tomgruber.org/writing/ontology-of-folksonomy.htm (retrieved January 10, 2008)
  9. 9.
    Paulsen, I., Mainz, D., Weller, K., Mainz, I., Kohl, J., von Haeseler, A.: Ontoverse: Collaborative Knowledge Management in the Life Sciences Network. In: Proceedings of the Germany eScience Conference 2007, Max Planck Digital Library (2007) ID 316588.0Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Baclawski, K., Niu, T.: Ontologies for Bioinformatics. MIT Press, Cambridge (2006)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bodenreider, O., Stevens, R.: Bio-Ontologies: Current Trends and Future Directions. Briefings in Bioinformatics 7(3), 256–274 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Burger, A., Davidson, D., Baldock, R. (eds.): Anatomy Ontologies for Bioinformatics. Principles and Practice. Springer, Goldaming (2008)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ashburner, M., et al.: Gene Ontology: Tool for the Unification of Biology. Nat. Genet. 25, 25–29 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Baker, P.G., Goble, C.A., Bechhofer, S., Paton, N.W., Stevens, R., Brass, A.: An Ontology for Bioinformatics Applications. Bioinformatics 15(6), 510–520 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chen, R.O., Felciano, R., Altman, R.B.: RiboWeb: Linking Structural Computations to a Knowledge Base of Published Experimental Data. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Intelligent Systems for Molecular Biology, pp. 84–87. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (1997)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Altman, R., Bada, M., Chai, X.J., Whirl Carillo, M., Chen, R.O., Abernethy, N.F.: RiboWeb: An Ontology-Based System for Collaborative Molecular Biology. IEEE Intelligent Systems 14(5), 68–76 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Karp, P., Paley, S.: Integrated Access to Metabolic and Genomic Data. Journal of Computational Biology 3(1), 191–212 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Smith, B., Ashburner, M., Rosse, C., Bard, J., Bug, W., Ceusters, W., Goldberg, L.J., Eilbeck, K., Ireland, A., Mungall, C.J., Leontis, N., Rocca-Serra, P., Ruttenberg, A., Sansone, S.A., Scheuermann, R.H., Shah, N., Whetzel, P.L., Lewis, S.: The OBO Foundry: Coordinated Evolution of Ontologies to Support Biomedical Data Integration. Nature Biotechnology 25, 1251–1255 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rojas, I., Ratsch, E., Saric, J., Wittig, U.: Notes on the Use of Ontologies in the Biochemical Domain. Silico Biology 4, 9 (2003)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Stevens, R., Goble, C.A., Bechhofer, S.: Ontology-based Knowledge Representation for Bioinformatics. Briefings in Bioinformatics 1(4), 398–416 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Godfray, H.C.J.: Challenges for Taxonomy. Nature 417, 17–19 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wilm, A., Mainz, I., Steger, G.: An Enhanced RNA Alignment Benchmark for Sequence Alignment Programs. Algorithms for Molecular Biology 1(19) (2006)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Dalli, D., Wilm, A., Mainz, I., Steger, G.: StrAl: Progressive Alignment of Non-coding RNA Using Base Pairing Probability Vectors in Quadratic Time. Bioinformatics 22(13), 1593–1599 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bao, J., Honavar, V.: Collaborative Ontology Building with Wiki@nt. A Multi-agent Based Ontology Building Environment. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Evaluation of Ontology-based Tools (EON), Hiroshima, pp. 1–10 (2004)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Fensel, D.: Ontologies: Silver Bullet for Knowledge Management and Electronic Commerce. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Peters, I., Stock, W.G.: Folksonomy and Information Retrieval. In: Proceedings of the 70th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, vol. 45, pp. 1510–1542 (2007) (CD-ROM) Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sure, Y., Staab, S., Studer, R.: Methodology for Development and Employment of Ontology Based Knowledge Management Applications. ACM SIGMOD Record, Special Section on Semantic Web and Data Management 4(31), 18–23 (2002)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Buitelaar, P., Cimiano, P., Magnini, B. (eds.): Ontology Learning from Text: Methods, Evaluation and Applications. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, vol. 123. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2005)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Staab, S., Studer, R.: Handbook on Ontologies. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Cohen, K.B., Hunter, L.: Natural Language Processing and Systems Biology. In: Dubitzky, W., Pereira, F. (eds.) Artificial intelligence and systems biology, Springer, Berlin (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dominic Mainz
    • 1
  • Ingo Paulsen
    • 1
  • Indra Mainz
    • 1
  • Katrin Weller
    • 1
  • Jochen Kohl
    • 1
  • Arndt von Haeseler
    • 2
  1. 1.Heinrich-Heine-UniversityDuesseldorfGermany
  2. 2.Center for Integrative Bioinformatics Vienna, Max F. Perutz LaboratoriesUniversity of Vienna, Medical University of Vienna and Veterinary University of, ViennaViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations