On the Sets of Real Numbers Recognized by Finite Automata in Multiple Bases
This paper studies the expressive power of finite automata recognizing sets of real numbers encoded in positional notation. We consider Muller automata as well as the restricted class of weak deterministic automata, used as symbolic set representations in actual applications. In previous work, it has been established that the sets of numbers that are recognizable by weak deterministic automata in two bases that do not share the same set of prime factors are exactly those that are definable in the first order additive theory of real and integer numbers Open image in new window. This result extends Cobham’s theorem, which characterizes the sets of integer numbers that are recognizable by finite automata in multiple bases.
In this paper, we first generalize this result to multiplicatively independent bases, which brings it closer to the original statement of Cobham’s theorem. Then, we study the sets of reals recognizable by Muller automata in two bases. We show with a counterexample that, in this setting, Cobham’s theorem does not generalize to multiplicatively independent bases. Finally, we prove that the sets of reals that are recognizable by Muller automata in two bases that do not share the same set of prime factors are exactly those definable in Open image in new window. These sets are thus also recognizable by weak deterministic automata. This result leads to a precise characterization of the sets of real numbers that are recognizable in multiple bases, and provides a theoretical justification to the use of weak automata as symbolic representations of sets.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- [BBR97]Boigelot, B., Bronne, L., Rassart, S.: An improved reachability analysis method for strongly linear hybrid systems. In: Grumberg, O. (ed.) CAV 1997. LNCS, vol. 1254, pp. 167–177. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)Google Scholar
- [Büc62]Büchi, J.R.: On a decision method in restricted second order arithmetic. In: Proc. International Congress on Logic, Methodoloy and Philosophy of Science, pp. 1–12. Stanford University Press, Stanford (1962)Google Scholar
- [HW85]Hardy, G.H., Wright, E.M.: An introduction to the theory of numbers, 5th edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1985)Google Scholar
- [Per90]Perrin, D.: Finite automata. In: van Leeuwen, J. (ed.) Handbook of Theoretical Computer Science. Formal Models and Semantics, vol. B. Elsevier and MIT Press (1990)Google Scholar
- [PP04]Perrin, D., Pin, J.E.: Infinite words. Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 141. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2004)Google Scholar
- [Saf88]Safra, S.: On the complexity of ω-automata. In: Proc. 29th Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pp. 319–327. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (1988)Google Scholar
- [WB95]Wolper, P., Boigelot, B.: An automata-theoretic approach to Presburger arithmetic constraints. In: Mycroft, A. (ed.) SAS 1995. LNCS, vol. 983, pp. 21–32. Springer, Heidelberg (1995)Google Scholar
- [Wei99]Weispfenning, V.: Mixed real-integer linear quantifier elimination. In: Proc. ACM SIGSAM ISSAC, Vancouver, pp. 129–136. ACM Press, New York (1999)Google Scholar
- [Wil93]Wilke, T.: Locally threshold testable languages of infinite words. In: Enjalbert, P., Wagner, K.W., Finkel, A. (eds.) STACS 1993. LNCS, vol. 665, pp. 607–616. Springer, Heidelberg (1993)Google Scholar