Advertisement

An Attentive Groupware Device to Mitigate Information Overload

  • Antonio Ferreira
  • Pedro Antunes
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5136)

Abstract

We propose an attentive device for synchronous groupware systems to mitigate information overload. The opportunity seeker device leverages the users’ natural alternation between doing individual work and attending to the group to dynamically manage the delivery timing and quantity of group awareness information that each user is exposed to. We describe how this device can be implemented on an electronic brainstorming tool and show its influence on the distribution of ideas to the users. Results from a laboratory experiment using this tool indicate that group performance increased 9.6% when compared to the immediate broadcast of ideas and a post-hoc analysis suggests that information overload was attenuated: users were subject to 44.1% less deliveries of ideas, which gave them 54.7% more uninterrupted time; users switched 18.8% faster from submitting an idea to start typing the next idea; and the time to write an idea was reduced by 16.3%.

Keywords

Group Performance Individual Work Task Switching Aggregation Period Computer Support Cooperative Work 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Vertegaal, R.: Attentive user interfaces: Introduction. Communications of the ACM 46(3), 30–33 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Roda, C., Thomas, J.: Attention aware systems: Introduction to special issue. Computers in Human Behavior 22(4), 555–556 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vertegaal, R., Shell, J.S., Chen, D., Mamuji, A.: Designing for augmented attention: Towards a framework for attentive user interfaces. Computers in Human Behavior 22(4), 771–789 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fogarty, J., Ko, A.J., Aung, H.H., Golden, E., Tang, K.P., Hudson, S.E.: Examining task engagement in sensor-based statistical models of human interruptibility. In: CHI 2005: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pp. 331–340. ACM Press, New York (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Baudisch, P., DeCarlo, D., Duchowski, A.T., Geisler, W.S.: Focusing on the essential: Considering attention in display design. Communications of the ACM 46(3), 60–66 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vertegaal, R., Weevers, I., Sohn, C., Cheung, C.: GAZE-2: Conveying eye contact in group video conferencing using eye-controlled camera direction. In: CHI 2003: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pp. 521–528. ACM Press, New York (2003)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jenkin, T., McGeachie, J., Fono, D., Vertegaal, R.: eyeView: Focus+context views for large group video conferences. In: CHI 2005: Extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, pp. 1497–1500. ACM Press, New York (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Raikundalia, G.K., Zhang, H.L.: Newly-discovered group awareness mechanisms for supporting real-time collaborative authoring. In: AUIC 2005: Proceedings of the Sixth Australasian conference on User interface, pp. 127–136. Australian Computer Society, Sydney, Australia (2005)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gutwin, C., Greenberg, S.: A descriptive framework of workspace awareness for real-time groupware. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 11(3), 411–446 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gutwin, C., Benford, S., Dyck, J., Fraser, M., Vaghi, I., Greenhalgh, C.: Revealing delay in collaborative environments. In: CHI 2004: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pp. 503–510. ACM Press, New York (2004)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bailey, B.P., Konstan, J.A.: On the need for attention-aware systems: Measuring effects of interruption on task performance, error rate, and affective state. Computers in Human Behavior 22(4), 685–708 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    McFarlane, D.C.: Comparison of four primary methods for coordinating the interruption of people in human-computer interaction. Human-Computer Interaction 17(1), 63–139 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Osborn, A.F.: Applied imagination: Principles and procedures of creative problem-solving, 3rd edn. Scribner, New York (1963)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Antonio Ferreira
    • 1
  • Pedro Antunes
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of InformaticsUniversity of LisbonLisboaPortugal

Personalised recommendations