Long-Term Orientation in Trade
Trust does not work in the same way across cultures. This paper presents an agent model of behavior in trade across Hofstedes cultural dimension of long-term vs. short-term orientation. The situation is based on a gaming simulation, the Trust and Tracing game. The paper investigates the micro-dynamics of trust in a trade relationship, focusing on one dimension of culture only. This is a deliberate simplification that is made in order to highlight the role of this particular dimension of culture. The dimension is relevant for trade between East Asia and the Western world. The paper discusses the cultural dimension of long-tern vs. short-term orientation and specifies decision rules for trading agents, differentiated across the dimension. The paper contributes to bridging the gap between macro level analysis of intercultural trade and micro level knowledge about culturally determined behaviour. To this end the agent model is implemented in a multi-agent simulation. Potential applications of the model are to be found primarily in research into the formation and performance of supply chains and networks, and secondarily in training, education, and advice systems. The implementation of the model has been verified to qualitatively represent the effects expected on the basis of Hofstedes theory.
KeywordsBusiness Partner Trade Process Negotiation Behavior Trading Agent Successful Transaction
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- R. Guo. How culture influences foreign trade: evidence from the U.S. and China. Journal of SocioEconomics, 33:785-812, 2004.Google Scholar
- C. Hampden-Turner and F. Trompenaars. Mastering the Infinite Game: How East Asian Values are Transforming Business Practices. Capstone, Mankato, MN, 1997.Google Scholar
- G. Hofstede. Cultures Consequences, Second Edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, 2001.Google Scholar
- G. Hofstede and G. J. Hofstede. Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind, Third Millennium Edn. McGraw-Hill, London, 2005.Google Scholar
- G. J. Hofstede. Trust and transparency in supply netchains: a contradiction? In W. Y. C. Wang et al., editor, Supply Chain Management: Issues in the New Era of Collaboration and Competition, pages 105-126. Idea Group, 2007.Google Scholar
- M. J. W. Jansen, W. A. H. Rossing, and R. A. Damen. Monte carlo estimation of uncertainty contributions from several independent multivariate sources. In J. Grasman and G. van Straten, editors, Predictability and nonlinear modelling in natural sciences and economics, pages 334-343. Kluwer, Dordecht, 1994.Google Scholar
- C. M. Jonker and J. Treur. An agent architecture for multi-attribute negotiation. In N. Nebel, editor, Proceedings of the 17th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence IJCAI 01, pages 1195-2001. Morgan Kaufman, Los Altos, CA, 2001.Google Scholar
- M. Minkov. What makes us different and similar. Klasika I stil, Sofia, 2007.Google Scholar
- D. S. Wilson. Evolution for Everyone. Delacorte Press, New York, 2007.Google Scholar