Usability and Accessibility on the Internet: Effects of Accessible Web Design on Usability

  • Wolfram Huber
  • Peter Vitouch
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5105)


Despite the overlapping scope and aims of web-usability and web-accessibility (such as problems in using the web and the barriers in accessing the web) threre are only few studies which analyse the connections between the two areas. The present study investigates the relationship between web-accessibility and web-usability. To analyse this relationship we have designed an online test environment. We developed three complete internet presences (testportals), each one with a different level of accessibility. 131 test users were recruited viewed these three testportals and rated their usability. The instrument to evaluate usability was an especially modified and reduced version of the Web Usability Index (WUI) which was made available online in the form of a questionnaire. The central question this study sought to answer was: is there a difference in the usability ratings between websites with different levels of accessibility? The findings resulting from the central question were clear. The mean values show a significant difference in the usability ratings of the three portals. Other question our study sought to answer were the influences of the disability and the age factors. These influences are partly significant.


Human Computer-Interaction Usability Accessibility Age Disabilities 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    Becker, Shirley.: A study of web usability for older adults seeking online health resources. In: ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), vol. 11(4), pp. 387–406. ACM Press, New York (2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Holzinger, A., Searle, G., Nischelwitzer, A.: On some Aspects of Improving Mobile Applications for the Elderly. In: Coping with Diversity in Universal Access, Research and Development Methods in Universal Access. LNCS, vol. 4554, pp. 923–932. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chadwick-Dias, A., McNulty, M., Tullis, T.: Tom: Web usability and age: how design changes can improve performance. In: ACM SIGCAPH Computers and the Physically Handicapped, Proceedings of the 2003 conference on Universal usability CUU 2003, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, vol. 73-74, pp. 30–37. ACM Press, New York (2002)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Luschin, P., Miller-Fahringer, K., Rubisch, M.: Max: Bericht der Bundesregierung über die Lage der behinderten Menschen in Österreich. Bundesministerium für soziale Sicherheit, Generationen und Konsumentenschutz (Hg.). Wien (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kleinberger, T., Becker, M., Ras, E., Holzinger, A., Müller, P.: Ambient Intelligence in Assisted Living: Enable Elderly People to Handle Future Interfaces. In: Stephanidis, C. (ed.) UAHCI 2007 (Part II). LNCS, vol. 4555, pp. 103–112. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
  8. 8.
    Nielsen, J.: Usability engineering. Academic Press, San Diego. Morgan Kaufmann, Calif. [u.a.] (1993)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Holzinger, A.: Usability Engineering for Software Developers. Communications of the ACM 48(1), 71–74 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kheir, O., Petrie, H.: The Relationship between Accessibility and Usability of Websites. In: Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, San Jose, California, USA, pp. 397–406. ACM Press, New York (2007)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Theofanos, M.F., Redish, J.: Bridging the gap between accessibility and usability. In: Interactions, vol. 10(6), pp. 36–51. ACM, New York (2003)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wolfram Huber
    • 1
  • Peter Vitouch
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of PsychologyUniversity Vienna 

Personalised recommendations