Automatic Creation of User Profiles for Achieving Personal Web Accessibility

  • Markel Vigo
  • Amaia Aizpurua
  • Myriam Arrue
  • Julio Abascal
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5105)


Automatic capture of the user’s interaction environment for user-adapted interaction and evaluation purposes is an unexplored area in the Web Accessibility research field. This paper presents an application that collects user data regarding assistive technologies (be either software or hardware) in an unobtrusive way. As a result, CC/PP based profiles are created so that interoperability between components such as evaluation engines or server-side content adaptors can be attained. The implications that versioning issues and the potential user group of a given assistive technology have on the guidelines to apply are also remarked. The major benefit of this approach is that users can perform their tasks avoiding distractions while interacting with the World Wide Web.


User Profile Assistive Technology Universal Access Screen Reader Accessibility Guideline 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Benyon, D., Murray, D.: Applying user modelling to human-computer interaction design. Artificial Intelligence Review 7(3-4) (1993)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stephanidis, C.: Adaptive Techniques for Universal Access. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction: The Journal of Personalization Research 11(1-2), 159–179 (2001)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sloan, D., Heath, A., Hamilton, F., Kelly, B., Petrie, H., Phipps, L.: Contextual Web Accessibility - Maximizing the benefit of Accessibility Guidelines. In: International Cross-Disciplinary Workshop on Web Accessibility, W4A 2006, pp. 121–131. ACM Press, New York (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Klyne, G., Reynolds, F., Woodrow, F., Ohto, H., Hjelm, J., Butler, M., Tran, L. (eds.): Composite Capability/Preference Profiles (CC/PP): Structure and Vocabularies 1.0, W3C Recommendation, January 15 (2004),
  5. 5.
    Chisholm, W., Vanderheiden, G., Jacobs, I. (eds.): Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0, W3C Recommendation, May 5 (1999),
  6. 6.
    Theofanos, M.F., Redish, J.: Bridging the gap: between accessibility and usability. Interactions 10(6), 36–51 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Arrue, M., Vigo, M., Abascal, J.: Architecture for Personal Web Accessibility. In: Miesenberger, K., Klaus, J., Zagler, W., Karshmer, A.I. (eds.) ICCHP 2006. LNCS, vol. 4061, pp. 120–127. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vigo, M., Kobsa, A., Arrue, M., Abascal, J.: User-Tailored Web Accessibility Evaluations. In: 18th Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia, HYPERTEXT 2007, pp. 95–104. ACM Press, New York (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rabin, J., McCathieNevile, C. (eds.): Mobile Web Best Practices 1.0, W3C Proposed Recommendation, November 2 (2006),
  10. 10.
    Owen, S., Rabin, J. (eds.): W3C mobileOK Basic Tests 1.0, W3C Candidate Recommendation, November 30 (2007),
  11. 11.
    Vigo, M., Aizpurua, A., Arrue, M., Abascal, J.: Evaluating Web Accessibility for Specific Mobile Devices. In: International Cross-Disciplinary Workshop on Web Accessibility, W4A 2008. ACM Press, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Brusilovsky, P.: Methods and Techniques of Adaptive Hypermedia. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction: The Journal of Personalization Research 6(2-3), 87–129 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Arrue, M., Vigo, M., Abascal, J.: Web Accessibility Awareness in Search Engines Results. Universal Access to the Information Society 7(1-2), 103–116 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Harper, S.: Is there design-for-all? Universal Access in the Information Society 6(1), 111–113 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kim, H.-M., Lee, K.-H.: Device-independent web browsing based on CC/PP and annotation. Interacting with Computers 18(2), 283–303 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fink, J., Kobsa, A., Nill, A.: Adaptable and Adaptive Information Provision for All Users, Including Disabled and Elderly People. New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia 4(1), 163–188 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Velasco, C., Mohamad, Y., Gilman, A., Viorres, N., Vlachogiannis, E., Arnellos, A., Darzentas, J.: Universal access to information services-the need for user information and its relationship to device profiles. Universal Access in the Information Society 3(1), 88–95 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hanson, V.L., Brezin, J.P., Crayne, S., Keates, S., Kjeldsen, R., Richards, J.T., Swart, C., Trewin, S.: Improving Web accessibility through and enhanced open-source browser. IBM Systems Journal 44(3), 573–588 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kobsa, A.: Personalized Hypermedia and International Privacy. Communications of the ACM 45(5), 64–67 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF),

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Markel Vigo
    • 1
  • Amaia Aizpurua
    • 1
  • Myriam Arrue
    • 1
  • Julio Abascal
    • 1
  1. 1.Informatika FakultateaUniversity of the Basque CountryDonostiaSpain

Personalised recommendations