The Increasing Wildfire and Post-Fire Debris-Flow Threat in Western USA, and Implications for Consequences of Climate Change
In southern California and the intermountain west of the USA, debris flows generated from recently-burned basins pose significant hazards. Increases in the frequency and size of wildfires throughout the western USA can be attributed to increases in the number of fire ignitions, fire suppression practices, and climatic influences. Increased urbanization throughout the western USA, combined with the increased wildfire magnitude and frequency, carries with it the increased threat of subsequent debris-flow occurrence. Differences between rainfall thresholds and empirical debris-flow susceptibility models for southern California and the intermountain west indicate a strong influence of climatic and geologic settings on post-fire debris-flow potential. The linkages between wildfires, debris-flow occurrence, and global warming suggests that the experiences in the western United States are highly likely to be duplicated in many other parts of the world, and necessitate hazard assessment tools that are specific to local climates and physiographies.
KeywordsDebris flow Hazards Risk Climate change Western USA Southern California Intermountain west USA
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Allen CD, Touchan R, Swetnam TW (1996) Overview of fire history in the Jemez Mountains, New Mexico, In: Goff F, Kues BS, Rogers MA, McFadden LD, Gardner JN, (eds.), The Jemez Mountain region, New Mexico Geological Society, Forty-Seventh Annual Field Conference, September 25–28, 1996, 35–36.Google Scholar
- Backlund P, Janetos A, Schimel D (2008) The effects of climate change on agriculture, land resources, water resources, and biodiversity in the United States. Final Report, Synthesis and Assessment Product 4.3, A Report by the U.S. Climate Change Science Program and the Subcommittee on Global Change Research, US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- Bailey RW, Craddock GW, Croft AR (1947) Watershed management for summer flood control in Utah. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Miscellaneous Publication 639, 24p.Google Scholar
- Beven KJ (2000) Rainfall-runoff modeling: the primer: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester, England, 360p.Google Scholar
- Campbell RH (1985) Feasibility of a nationwide program for the identification and delineation of hazards from mud flows and other landslides: Chapter C, priority U.S. areas for the delineation of susceptibility to mud flows and other landslides. US Geological Survey Open-File Report 85-276-C, 1–6.Google Scholar
- Cannon SH, Gartner JE, Holland-Sears A, Thurston BM, Gleason JA (2003) Debris-flow response of basins burned by the 2002 Coal Seam and Missionary Ridge fires, Colorado. In: Boyer DD, Santi PM, Rogers WP (eds.), Engineering Geology in Colorado–Contributions, Trends, and Case Histories: AEG Special Publication 15, Colorado Geological Survey Special Publication 55, 31 pp.Google Scholar
- Chourre M, Wright S (2005) Population growth of southwest United States 1900–1990. Impact of climate change and land use in the southwest United States, http://geochange.er.usgs.gov/sw/.
- Costa JE (1984) Physical geomorphology of debris flows. In: Costa JE, Fleisher PJ (eds.), Developments and applications of Geomorphology. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 268–317.Google Scholar
- DeGraff, JV, Lewis DS (1989) Using past landslide activity to guide post-wildfire mitigation. In: Watters RJ (ed.) (1989) Proceedings of the 25th Symposium on Engineering Geology and Geotechnical Engineering, Reno, NV, pp. 65–75.Google Scholar
- DeGraff JV, Cannon SH, Gallegos AJ (2007) Reducing post-wildfire debris flow risk through the burned area emergency response (BAER) process. In: Scaefer VR, Schuster RL, Turner AK (eds.), AEG Special Publication 23: 1440–1447.Google Scholar
- Eaton EC (1935) Flood and erosion control problems and their solution. ASCE Transactions, 101, 1302–1330.Google Scholar
- Giraud RE, McDonald GN (2007) The 2000–2004 fire-related debris flows in northern Utah. In: Schaefer VR, Schuster RL, Turner AK (eds.), AEG Special Publication 23, 1522–1531.Google Scholar
- Helsel DR, Hirsch RM (2002) Statistical methods in water resources. U.S. Geological Survey Techniques of Water Resources Investigations, Book 4, Chapter A3, 510p. http://water.usgs.gov.pubs/twri/twri4a3/.
- Kotok EI, Kraebel CJ (1935) Discussion of “Flood and erosion control problems and their solution”. ASCE Transactions, 101, 1350–1355.Google Scholar
- Minnich, RA (1989) Chaparral fire history in San Diego County and adjacent northern Baja California: An evaluation of natural fire regimes and the effects of suppression management. Keeley, SC (ed.), The California chaparral, Los Angeles Natural History Museum Series 34, 37–47.Google Scholar
- Scott KM (1971) Origin and sedimentology of 1969 debris flows near Glendora, California. US Geological Survey Prof. Paper 750-C, C242–C247.Google Scholar
- Trouet V, Taylor AH, Carleton AM, Skinner CN (2008) Interannual variations in fire weather, fire extent, and synoptic-scale circulation patterns in northern California and Oregon. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, Online First, SpringerLink, DOI 10.1007/s00704-008-0012-x.Google Scholar
- Wells WG II (1981) Some effects of brushfires on erosion processes in coastal Southern California. In: Erosion and Sediment Transport in Pacific Rim Steeplands, Christchurch, New Zealand, International Association of Hydrological Science, 132, 305–342.Google Scholar
- Wells WG II (1987) The effects of fire on the generation of debris flows in southern California. Geological Society of America Reviews in Engineering Geology, 7, 105–114.Google Scholar