Map Comparison Methods for Comprehensive Assessment of Geosimulation Models
A crucial task in the calibration and validation of geosimulation models is to measure the agreement between model and reality. In recent years many map comparison methods have been developed for this purpose. This paper presents a framework to systematically assess different aspects of model performance and express the results relative to a common reference level. Application on a constrained cellular automata model of the Netherlands demonstrates that the framework gives an in-depth account of model performance. It also shows that any performance assessment that does not follow a multi-criteria approach or lacks a reference level results in an unbalanced account and ultimately false conclusions.
Keywordsgeosimulation calibration validation map comparison
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 6.Kuhnert, M., Voinov, A., Seppelt, R.: Comparing raster map comparison algorithms for spatial modeling and analysis. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 71, 975–984 (2005)Google Scholar
- 7.Pontius Jr., R.G.: Quantification error versus location error in comparison of categorical maps. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 66, 1011–1016 (2000)Google Scholar
- 13.Schelling, T.C.: Dynamic models of segregation. J. Math. Sociol. 1, 143–186 (1971)Google Scholar
- 26.Pontius Jr., R.G.: Statistical methods to partition effects of quantity and location during comparison of categorical maps at multiple resolutions. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 68, 1041–1049 (2002)Google Scholar
- 27.McGarigal, K., Cushman, S.A., Neel, M.C., Ene, R.: FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for categorical maps. Computer software program produced by the authors at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst (2002), http://www.umass.edu/landeco/research/fragstats/fragstats.html
- 33.Schweitzer, F., Steinbink, J.: Urban cluster growth: analysis and computer simulations of urban aggregations. In: Schweitzer, F. (ed.) Self-organization of complex structures: from individual to collective dynamics, pp. 501–518. Gordon & Breach, London (1997)Google Scholar
- 35.Hagen-Zanker, A., Lajoie, G.: Neutral models of landscape change as benchmarks in the assessment of model performance. Landscape Urban Plann (in press, 2008)Google Scholar
- 36.van Vliet, J.: Validation of land use change models: a case study on the Environment Explorer. Centre for geo-information, Master’s thesis. Universiteit Wageningen, Wageningen, 65 (2006)Google Scholar