The Future of Product Development pp 451-462 | Cite as
Contact Pressure Calculation Methodologies in Aeronautic Gearboxes in the CAD Process
Conference paper
Abstract
This paper deals with the various methodologies usable in a CAD environment for the calculation of contact pressures in aeronautic gearbox bearings. These methodologies may be analytical (Hertz theory), numerical (F.E.M.) or hybrid. They are analyzed and compared according to their precision, calculation time and readiness to be integrated in the industrial design process. An optimum contact pressure calculation methodology will be presented based upon the results of this analysis.
Keywords
Bearing CAD Finite element method Hertz theory GearboxPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Hertz H, (1882) Über die Berührung fester elastischer Körper. J Reine Angew Math, 92:156–71Google Scholar
- 2.Stribeck R, (1907) Ball Bearing for Various Loads. Trans. ASME 29, 420–463.Google Scholar
- 3.ISO 76 Static load ratings.Google Scholar
- 4.Lundberg G, and Palmgren A, (1947) Dynamic Capacity of Rolling Bearings. Acta polyechnica 7. Mechanical engineering series, Vol 1, No3.Google Scholar
- 5.ISO 281 Dynamic load ratings and rating life.Google Scholar
- 6.Jones A B, (1959) Ball motion and sliding friction in ball bearing. ASME Trans. 81,1–12.Google Scholar
- 7.Jones A B, (1960) A general theory for elastically constrained ball and radial roller bearings under arbitrary load and speed conditions. ASME Trans. 82 309–320.Google Scholar
- 8.Harris T, (2001) Rolling Bearing Analysis 4th edition. WILEY-Interscience.Google Scholar
- 9.Jones A B and Harris T, (1963) Analysis of a Rolling Element Idler Gear Bearing Having a Deformable Outer Race Structure. ASME trans., J. Basic Eng, 273–279.Google Scholar
- 10.Zupan, S., Prebil, I., (2001) Carrying Angle And Carrying Capacity of Large Single Row Ball Bearing As a Function of Geometry Parameters of the Rolling Contact and the Supporting Structure Stiffness, Mechanism and Machine Theory 36 1087–1103.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Bourdon A, Rigal J, and Play D, (1999) Static Rolling Bering Model in a C.A.D. Environment for the Study of Complex Mechanisms: Part I-Rolling Bearing Model. ASME Trans., J. Tribology 121, 205–214.Google Scholar
- 12.Bourdon A, Rigal J, and Play D, (1999) Static Rolling Bering Model in a C.A.D. Environment for the Study of Complex Mechanisms: Part II-Rolling Bearing Model. ASME Trans., J. Tribology 121, 205–214.Google Scholar
- 13.Lovel MR, Khonsari MM, and Marangoni RD. (1996) A finite element analysis of the frictional forces between a cylindrical bearing element and MoS2 coated and uncoated surfaces. Wear; 194: 60–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Zhao H, (1998) Analysis of Load Distribution within Solid and Hollow Roller Bearings. ASME Trans., J. Tribology 120, 134–139.Google Scholar
- 15.Kang Y, Shen, P C, Huang C-C, Shyr S-S, Chang Y-P, (2006) A Modification of the Jones-Harris Method for Deep-Groove Ball Bearings. To be Appear in Tribology InternationalGoogle Scholar
Copyright information
© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007