Advertisement

Novel Antifouling Coatings: A Multiconceptual Approach

  • D. Rittschof
Part of the Springer Series on Biofilms book series (BIOFILMS, volume 4)

The development of novel antifouling and foul release coatings must be considered in the context of business, government, and academic research. Existing antifouling technology is based upon the use of broad-spectrum biocides. Foul release technology is partially developed, has incompletely understood mechanisms and unknown long term fates and effects. Business is structured to register, generate, deliver, apply, and remove antifouling coatings based upon broad-spectrum biocides. Business is weak in biology and study of fates and effects beyond those required for registration. Government is structured to regulate, respond to, and support basic research. Government is not proactive or cooperative. Academics are highly competitive, still relatively isolated from reality, strong in basic research, and not well versed in business or government. Rapid progress in novel coatings technology is unlikely in this environment. Business responses to regulations and awareness of environmental responsibility will drive the process.

Keywords

Business Model Antifouling Coating Minimal Environmental Impact Antifouling Compound Antifouling Biocide 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Afsar A, de Nys R, Steinberg P (2003) The effects of foul-release coatings on the settlement and behaviour cyprid larvae of the barnacle Balanus amphitrite amphitrite Darwin. Biofouling 19(Suppl):105–110PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alberte RS, Snyder S, Zahuranec B (1992) Biofouling research needs for the United States Navy: program history and goals. Biofouling 6:91–95Google Scholar
  3. AMBIO (2006) Advanced nanostructured surfaces for the control of biofouling http://www. ambio.bham.ac.uk/. Last accessed 14 July 2008
  4. Brady RF, Singer IL (2000) Mechanical factors favouring release from fouling release coatings. Biofouling 15(1–3):73–81Google Scholar
  5. Brancato MS, Toll J, DeForest D, Tear L (1999) Aquatic ecological risks posed by tributyltin in United States surface waters: pre-1989 to 1996 data. Environ Toxicol Chem 18:567–577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bultman JD, Griffith JR, Field DE (1984) Fluopolymer coatings for the marine environment. In: Costlow JD, Tipper RC (eds.) Marine biodeterioration: an interdisciplinary study. US Naval Institute, Annapolis, MD, pp. 237–242Google Scholar
  7. Callow ME, Willingham GL (1996) Degradation of antifouling biocides. Biofouling 10:239–249Google Scholar
  8. Champ M (2000) A review of organotin regulatory strategies, pending actions, related costs and benefits. Sci Total Environ 258:21–71PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clare AS (1997) Towards nontoxic antifouling (mini-review). J Mar Biotechnol 6:3–6Google Scholar
  10. Clare AS, Rittschof D, Gerhart DJ, Maki JS (1992) Molecular approaches to nontoxic antifouling. J Invert Reprod Dev 22:67–76Google Scholar
  11. Costlow JDC, Tipper RC (1984) Marine biodeterioration: an interdisciplinary approach. US Naval Institute, Annapolis, MDGoogle Scholar
  12. Dahllöf I, Grunnet K, Haller R, Hjorth M, Maraldo K, Petersen DG (2005) Analysis, Fate and toxicity of zinc and copper pyrithione in the marine environment. TemaNord 550–583Google Scholar
  13. Fisher EC, Castelli VJ, Rodgers SD, Bleile HR (1984) Technology for control of marine biofouling — a review. In: Costlow JD, Tipper RC (eds.) Marine biodeterioration: an interdisciplinary study. US Naval Institute Press, Annapolis, MD, pp. 261–299Google Scholar
  14. Galvin RM, Mellado JMR, Neihof RA (1998) A contribution to the study of the natural dynamics of pyrithione (ii): deactivation by direct chemical and adsorptive oxidation. Eur Water Manag 4:61–64Google Scholar
  15. Gough MA, Fothergill J, Hendrie JD (1994) A survey of southern England coastal waters for the s-triazine antifouling compound Irgarol 1051. Mar Pollut Bull 28:613–620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hadfield MG (1998) Research on settlement and metamorphosis of marine invertebrate larvae: past, present and future. Biofouling 12:9–29Google Scholar
  17. Harrington JC, Jacobson A, Mazza LS, Willingham G (2000) Designing an environmentally safe marine antifoulant. Presented at the10th international congress on marine corrosion and fouling, DSTO, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  18. Holm ER, Orihuela B, Kavanagh CJ, Rittschof D (2005) Variation among families for characteristics of the adhesive plaque in the barnacle. Balanus amphitrite Biofouling 21:121–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. International Maritime Organization (IMO) (2003) International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships, 1973, as modified by the Protocol of 1978 relating thereto (cited 6 April 2003). http://www.imo.org/home.asp. Last accessed 14 July 2008
  20. Kavanagh CJ, Swain GW, Kovach BS, Stein J, Darkangelo-Wood C, Truby K, Holm E, Montemarano J, Meyer A, Wiebe D (2003) The effects of silicone fluid additives and silicone elastomer matrices on barnacle adhesion strength. Biofouling 19:381–390PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Liu D, Pacepavicius GJ, Maguire RJ, Lau YL, Okamura H, Aoyama I (1999) Survey for the occurrence of the new antifouling compound Irgarol 1051 in the aquatic environment. Water Res 33:2833–2843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (1996) NYSDEC Registration of Irgarol algicide. http://pmep.cce.cornell.edu/profiles/herb-growthreg/fatty-alcohol-monuron/ irgarol/new-act-ing-irgarol.htmlLast accessed 14 July 2008
  23. Pesticide Action Network (2008) Diuron identification, toxicity, use, water pollution potential, ecological toxicity and regulatory information. PA N pesticides database. http://www.pesticideinfo.org/ Detail_Chemical.jsp?Rec_Id=PC33293 Last accessed 14 July 2008
  24. Preiser HS, Ticker A, Bohlander GS (1984) Coating selection or optimum ship performance. In: Costlow JD, Tipper RC (eds.) Marine biodeterioration: an interdisciplinary study. US Naval Institute Press, Annapolis, MD, pp. 223–228Google Scholar
  25. Readman JW (1996) Antifouling herbicides — a threat to the marine environment? Mar Pollut Bull 32:320–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rittschof D (2000) Natural product antifoulants: one perspective on the challenges related to coatings development. Biofouling 15:199–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rittschof D, Holm ER (1997) Antifouling and foul-release: a primer. In: Fingerman M, Nagabhushanam R, Thompson MF (eds.) Recent advances in marine biotechnology, vol I. Endocrinology and reproduction. Oxford and IBH, New Delhi, pp. 497–512Google Scholar
  28. Rittschof D, Parker KK (2001) Cooperative antifoulant testing: a novel multisector approach. In: Fingerman M, Nagabhushanam R (eds.) Recent advances in marine biotechnology, vol VI. Science, Einfield, pp. 239–253Google Scholar
  29. Stein J, Truby K, Wood CD, Gardner M, Swain G, Kavanagh C, Kovach B, Schultz M, Wiebe D, Holm E, Montemarano J, Wendt D, Smith C, Meyer A (2003) Silicone foul release coatings: effect of the interaction of oil and coating functionalities on the magnitude of macrofouling attachment strengths. Biofouling 19(Suppl):71–82PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schwarzenbach RP, Gschwend PM, Imboden DM (2003) Environmental organic chemistry, 2nd edn. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  31. Tolosa I, Readman JW (1996) Simultaneous analysis of the antifouling agents: tributyltin, tripheyltin and Irgarol 1051 used in antifouling paints. Mar Pollut Bull 335:267–274Google Scholar
  32. Tolosa IJ, Readman W, Blaevoet A, Ghilini S, Bartocci J, Horvat M (1996) Contamination of Mediterranean (Cote d'Azur) coastal waters by organotins and Irgarol 1051 used in antifouling paints. Mar Pollut Bull 32:335–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Willingham GL, Jacobson AH (1996) Designing an environmentally safe marine antifoulant. ACS Symp Ser 640224:–233Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Nicholas School of the EnvironmentDuke University Marine LaboratoryBeaufortUSA

Personalised recommendations