Surface Modification Approach to Control Biofouling

  • T. VladkovaEmail author
Part of the Springer Series on Biofilms book series (BIOFILMS, volume 4)

There are three principal approaches to control biofouling: (1) mechanical detachment of biofoulers if possible; (2) killing or inactivation of biofouling organisms using antibiotics, biocides, cleaning chemicals, etc. and (3) surface modification turning the substrate material into a low-fouling or non-sticking (non-adhesive) one. Such modification usually alters the surface chemical composition and morphology, surface topography and roughness, the hydrophilic/hydrophobic balance, as well as the surface energy and polarity.

In marine applications especially, current non-toxic biofouling control strategies are based mainly on the third approach, i.e., on the idea of creating low-fouling or non-adhesive material surfaces, an approach that includes development of strongly hydrophilic “water-like” bioinert materials. Strongly hydrophobic low-energy surfaces are preferable in industrial and marine biofouling control because of their relative stability in aqueous media and reduced interactions with living cells.

This chapter presents a brief overview of some possibilities for biofouling control by surface engineering. A number of related ideas will be discussed in this chapter, including: (1) the use of protein adsorption as a mediator of bioadhesion and biofoul-ing, (2) physicochemical parameters influencing these phenomena, (3) theoretical aspects of cell/surface interactions, (4) some popular surface modification techniques, and (5) examples of successful biofouling control approaches.


Contact Angle Extracellular Polymeric Substance Surface Free Energy Bacterial Adhesion Contact Angle Hysteresis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abarzua S, Jacubowski S (1995) Biotechnological investigation for the prevention of biofouling 1. Biological and biochemical principles for the prevention of biofouling.Mar Ecol Prog Ser123:301–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams J, Watts F (1993) Regulation of development and differentiation by the extracellular matrix.J Invest Dermatol117:1183–1198Google Scholar
  3. Altankov G (2003) Interaction of cells with biomaterial surfaces. DSc thesis, BAS, Institute of Biophysics, SofiaGoogle Scholar
  4. Altankov G, Groth T (1994) Reorganization of substratum bound fibronectin on hydrophilic and hydrophobic materials is related to biocompatibility.J Mater Sci: Mater Med5:732–737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. AMBIO (2006) Advanced nanostructured surfaces for the control of biofouling.http://www. accessed 14 July 2008
  6. An YH, Friedman RJ (1998) Concise review of mechanisms of bacterial adhesion to biomaterial surfaces.J Biomed Mater Res43:338–348PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Anderson C, Atlar M, Callow M, Candries M, Milne A, Townsin RL (2003) The development of fouling-release coatings for seagoing vessels. J Marine Design B4:11–23Google Scholar
  8. Arce FT, Avci R, Beech IB, Cooksey KE, Wigglesworth-Cooksey B (2003) A comparative study of RTV11 and intersleek elastomers.J Chem Phys119:1671–1682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Atthoff B (2006) Tailoring of biomaterials using ionic interactions. Synthesis, characterization and application, PhD thesis, Uppsala University, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  10. Baier RE (1973) Influence of the initial surface condition of materials on bioadhesion. In: Acker RF, Brown BE, DePalma JR, Iverson WP (eds.) Proceedings third international congress on marine corrosion and fouling. Northwestern University Press, Evanston, IL, pp. 633–639Google Scholar
  11. Baier RE (1980) Substrata influences on the adhesion of microorganisms and their resultant new surface properties. In: Bitton G, Marshal K (eds.) Adsorption of microorganisms to surfaces. Wiley, New York, pp. 59–104Google Scholar
  12. Baier RE (2006) Surface behavior of biomaterials: the theta surface for biocompatibility.J Mater Sci: Mater Med17:1057–1062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Baier RE, Shafrin EG, Zisman WA (1968) Adhesion: mechanisms that assist or impede it.Science162:1360–1368PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bailey FE, Koleske JV (1976) Poly(ethylene oxide). Academic, New York Baney RH, Voight CE, Mentele JW (1977) In: Harris FW, Seymour RB (eds.) Structure-solubility relationships in polymers. Plenum, New York, pp. 225–232Google Scholar
  15. Berglin M, Lönn N, Gatenholm P (2003) Coating modulus and barnacle bioadhesion.Biofouling195:63–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Berntsson KM (2001) Larval behaviour of the barnacle Balanus improvisus with implications for recruitment and biofouling control. PhD thesis, Dept. Marine Ecology, Göteborg UniversityGoogle Scholar
  17. Berntsson KM, Jonsson PR (2003) Temporal and spatial patterns in recruitment and succession of a temperate marine fouling assemblage: a comparison of static panels and boat hulls during the boating season.Biofouling19:187–195PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Berntsson KM, Jonsson PR, Lejhall M, Gatenholm P (2000) Analysis of behavioural reaction of micro textured surfaces and implications for recruitment by the barnacle Balanus improvisus.J Exp Mar Biol Ecol251:59–83PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bers V, Wahl M (2004) The influence of natural surface micro topographies on fouling.Biofouling20(1):43–51PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Bitton G, Marshall KC (eds.) (1980) Adsorption of microorganisms to surfaces. Wiley, LondonGoogle Scholar
  21. Bohringer KF (2003) Surface modification and modulation in microstructures: controlling protein adsorption, monolayer desorption and micro-self-assembly..J Microtech Microeng13:S1–S10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Bos R, van der Mei HC, Gold J, Busscher HJ (2000) Retention of bacteria on a substratum surface with micro-patterned hydrophobicity.Microbiol Lett,189:311–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Brady RF (1999) Properties which influence marine fouling resistance in polymers containing silicon and fluorine.Prog Org Coat35:31–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Brady RF (2000) Clean hulls without poisons: devising and testing nontoxic marine coatings.J Coat Technol72:44–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Brady RF (2003) Antifouling coatings without organotin.J Protect Coat Linings20(1):33–37Google Scholar
  26. Brady RF, Singler IL (2000) Mechanical factors favoring release from fouling release coatings.Biofouling15(1–3):73–81Google Scholar
  27. Brady RF, Bonafede SJ, Schmidt DL (1999) Self-assembled water-born fluoropolymer coatings for marine fouling resistance.JOCCA-Surf Coat Int82(12):582–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Brennan AB, Baney RH, Carman ML, Estes TG, Feinberg AW, Wilson LH, Schumacher JF (2005) Surface topography for non-toxic bioadhesion control. USA Patent 20060219143Google Scholar
  29. Brusscher HJ, Bos R, van der Mei HC (1995) Initial microbial adhesion is determinant for the strength of biofilm adhesion.FEMS Microbiol Lett128:229–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Bunyard WC, Romack TJ, DeSimone JM (1999) Perfluoropolyether synthesis in liquid carbon dioxide by hexafluoropropylene photooxidation.Macromolecules32:8224–8226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Callow ME, Fletcher RL (1994) The influence of low surface energy materials on bioadhesion: a review.Int Biodeterior Biodegradation34:333–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Callow ME, Callow JA (2000) Substratum location and zoospore behavior in the fouling alga Enteromorpha.Biofouling15:49–56Google Scholar
  33. Callow ME, Callow JA (2006) Biofilms. In: Fusetani N, Clare AS (eds.) Antifouling compounds. Progress in molecular and submolecular biology, vol 32. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp. 141–169Google Scholar
  34. Callow ME, Callow JA, Pickett-Heaps JD, Wetherbee R (1997) Primary adhesion of Enteromorpha propagules: quantitative settlement studies in video microscopy.J Phycol33:938–947CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Callow ME, Callow JA, Ista LK, Coleman SE, Nolasco AC, Lopez GP (2000) The use of self- assembled monolayers of different wettabilities to study surface selection and primary adhesion process of green algal (Enteromorpha) zoospores.Appl Environ Microbiol66:3249–3254PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Callow ME, Jennings AR, Brennan AB, Seegert CE, Gibson A, Wilson L, Feinberg A, Baney R, Callow JA (2002) Micro topographic cues for settlement of zoospores of the green fouling alga Enteromorpha.Biofouling18:229–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Carman ML, Estes TG, Feinberg AW, Schumacher JF, Wilkerson W, Wilson LH, Callow ME, Callow JA, Brenan AB (2006) Engineered antifouling microtopographies — correlating wet-tability with cell attachment.Biofouling, 22:11–21PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Casse F, Swain GW (2006) The development of microfouling on four commercial antifouling coatings under static and dynamic immersion.Int Biodeterior Biodegradation57:179–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Chan CM (1993) Polymer surface modification and characterization, Chapters 5–7. HanserGardner, BrookfieldGoogle Scholar
  40. Chan CM, Ko TM, Hiraoka H (1996) Polymer surface modification by plasmas and photons.Surf Sci Rep24(1–2):1–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Chaudhury MK, Finlay JA, Chung JY, Callow ME, Callow JA (2005) The Influence of elastic modulus and thickness of the release of the soft-fouling green alga Ulva linza from PDMS model networks.Biofouling21(1):41–48PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Cooksey KE, Wigglesworth-Cooksey B (1995) Adhesion of bacteria and diatoms to surfaces in the sea — a review.Aquat Microb Ecol9:87–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Corpe WA (1970) Attachment of marine bacteria to solid surfaces. In: Manly S (ed.) Adhesion in biological systems.Academic, New York, pp. 73–87Google Scholar
  44. Costerton JW, Cheng KJ, Geesey GG, Ladd TI, Nickel JC, Dasgupta M, Marrie TJ (1987) Bacterial biofilms in nature and disease.Ann Rev Microbiol41:435–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Cunliffe D, Smart CA, Alexander C, Vulfson EN (1999) Bacterial adhesion at synthetic surfaces.Appl Environ Microbiol65 (11):4995–5002PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Dahlström M, Jonsson H, Jonsson PR, Elwing H (2004) Surface wettability as a determinant in the settlement of the barnacle Balanus improvisus (DARWIN).J Exp Mar Biol Ecol305:223–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Derjaguin BV (1955) Theory of the heterocoagulation, interaction and adhesion of dissimilar particles in solutions of electrolytes.Discuss Faraday Soc18:85–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Dexter SC (1979) Influence of substratum critical surface tension on bacterial adhesion in situ studies.J Coll Interface Sci70:346–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Dunne WM (2002) Bacterial adhesion: seen any good biofilms lately?Clin Microbiol Rev15:155–166PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Elbert DL, Hubbel JA (1996) Surface treatments of polymers for biocompatibility.Annu Rev Mater Sci26:365–394Google Scholar
  51. Finlay JA, Callow ME, Ista LK, Lopez GP, Callow JA (2002) The influence of surface wettability on the adhesion strength of settled spores of the green alga Enteromorpha and the diatom Amphora.Integ Comp Biol42:1116–1125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Flammang P, Jangoux M (2004) Bioadhesion models from marine invertebrates: an integrated study — biomechanical, morphological, biochemical, molecular — of the processes involved in the adhesion of Cuvierian Tubules on sea cucumbers (Echiodermata, Holothuroidea). Mons Hainaut University, Belgium accesses 14 July 2008
  53. Flemming H-C, Greenhalgh M (2008) Concept and consequences of the EU biocide guideline. Springer Ser Biofilms. doi: 10.1007/7142_2008_12Google Scholar
  54. Gan D, Mueller A, Wooley KL (2003) Amphiphilic and hydrophobic surface patterns generated from hyberbranched fluoropolymer/linear polymer networks: minimally adhesive coatings via the crosslinking of s.J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem41:3531–3540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Ghatak A, Chaudhury MK, Shenoy V, Sharma A (2000) Meniscus instability in a thin elastic films.Phys Rev Lett85:4329–4332PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Gerbig YB, Phani AR, Haefke H (2005) Influence of nanoscale topography on the hydrophobicity of fluoro-based polymer thin films.Appl Surf Sci242:251–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Good RG (1992) Contact angle, wetting and adhesion: a critical review.J Adh Sci Techn6:1269–1302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Gölander C-G (1986) Preparation and properties of functionalised polymer surfaces. PhD thesis, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm 60Google Scholar
  59. Gölander C-G, Jönsson S-E, Vladkova T (1984) A surface coated article, process and means for the preparation of thereof and use of thereof. Sweden patent no 8404866—9/28.09.1984; Bulgarian Patent 67997/28.09.1984; European Patent 022966/28.09.84; PCT SE85/00376/28.09.84Google Scholar
  60. Gölander C-G, Jönsson S-E, Vladkova T, Stenius P, Eriksson J-C (1986) Preparation and protein- adsorption properties of photo-polymerized hydrophilic films coating N-vinyl pyrollidone (NVP), acrylic acid (AA) or ethylene oxide (EO) units as studied by ESCA.Coll Surf21:149–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Gölander C-G, Jönsson S-E, Vladkova T, Stenius P, Kisch E (1987) Protein adsorption on some hydrophilic films. Presented at 31st IUPAC, 13–18 July 1987, SofiaGoogle Scholar
  62. Griffith AA (1921) The phenomena of rupture and flow in solids.Phil Trans R Soc London A221:163–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Grinnell F, Milam M, Spree P (1972)Arch Biochem Biophys153:193Google Scholar
  64. Griesser HJ, Hartley PG, McArthur SL, McLean KM, Meagher L, Thissen H (2002) Interfacial properties and protein resistance of nano-scale polysaccharide coatings.Smart Mater Struct11:652–661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Groll J, Amirgoulova EV, Ameringer T, Heyes CD, Röcker C, Nienhaus GU, Möller M (2004) Biofunctionalized ultrathin coatings of cross-linked star-shaped poly(ethylene oxide) allow reversible folding of immobilized proteins).J Am Chem Soc126:4234–4339PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Grunlan MA, Lee NS, Gai G, Gedda T, Mabry JM, Mansfeld F, Kus E, Wendt DE, Kowalke GL, Finley JA, Callow JA, Callow ME, Weber WP (2004) Synthesis of a,w-bis epoxy oligo (1'H,1'H,2'H, 2'H-perfluoroalkyl siloxane)s and properties of their photo-acid cross-linked films.Chem Mater16:2433–2441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Grunlan MA, Lee NS, Mansfeld F (2006) Minimally adhesive polymer surfaces prepared from star oligosiloxanes and star oligofluorosiloxanes.J Polym Sci Part A: Poly Chem44:2551–2566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Gudipati CS, Greenlieaf CM, Johnson JA, Pornpimol P, Wooley KL (2004) Hyperbranched fluor- opolymer and linear PEG based amphiphilic crosslinked networks as efficient anti-fouling coatings: an insight into the surface compositions, topographies and morphologies.J Polym Sci Part A: Poly Chem42:6193–6208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Gudipati CS, Finlay JA, Callow JA, Callow ME, Wooley KL (2005) The antifouling and foulin- release performance of hyperbranched fluoropolymer (HBFP)-poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) composite coatings evaluated by adsorption of biomacromolecules and the green fouling alga Ulva.Langmuir21:3044–3053PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Hamza A, Pham VA, Matsuura T, Santerre JP (1977) Development of membranes with low surface energy to reduce fouling in ultrafiltration applications.J Membr Sci131:217–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Harder T (2008) Marine epibiosis — concepts, ecological consequences and host defense. Springer Ser Biofilms. doi: 10.1007/7142_2008_16Google Scholar
  72. Harris JM (1992) Poly(ethylene glycol) chemistry. Biotechnical and biomedical applications. Plenum, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  73. Hester JF, Banerjee P, Won YY, Akthakul A, Acar MH, Mayers AM (2002) ATRP of amphiphilic graft copolymers based on PVDF and their use as membrane additives.Macromolecules35:7652–7661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Hillborg H, Gedde UW (1999) Hydrophobicity changes in silicone rubbers.IEEE Trans Dielect Elect Insul6:703–717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Hlady V, Van Vagenen RA, Andrade JD (1985) In: Andrade JD (ed.) Surface and interfacial aspects of biomedical polymers, vol 2. Plenum, New York, p. 81Google Scholar
  76. Holland R, Dugdale TM, Wetherbee R, Brennan AB, Finlay JA, Callow JA, Callow ME (2004) Adhesion and motility of fouling diatoms on silicone elastomer. Biofouling 20:323–329PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Holm ER, Kavanagh CJ, Meyer AE, Wiebe D, Nedved BT, Wendt D, Smith CM, Hadfield MG, Swain G, Wood CD, Truby K, Stein J, Montemarano J (2006) Interspecific variation in patterns of adhesion of marine fouling to silicone surfaces. Biofouling 22(3–4):233–243PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Homma H, Kuroyagi I, Izumi K, Murley CL, Ronzello J, Boggs SA (1999) Diffusion of low molecular weight siloxane from bulk to surface. IEEE Trans Dielect Elect Insul 6:370–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Humphrey AJ, Finlay JA, Pettitt ME, Stanley MS, Callow JA (2005) Effect of Ellman's reagent and dithiothreitol on the curing of the spore adhesive glycoprotein of the green alga Ulva. J Adhesion 81:791–803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Ikada Y, Suzuki M, Tamada Y (1984) Polymer surfaces possessing minimal interaction with blood components. In: Shalaby SW, Hoffman AS, Ratner BD, Horbett TA (eds.) Polymers as bioma- terials. Plenum, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  81. Ista LK, Callow M, Finlay S, Coleman E, Nolasco AC, Simons RH, Callow JA, Lopez GP (2004) Effect of substratum surface chemistry and surface energy on attachment of marine bacteria and algal spores. Appl Environ Microbiol 70(7):4151–4157PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Johston E, Bullock S, Uilk J, Gatenhohnm P, Wynne KJ (1999) Networks from a,w- dihydroxypoly(dimethylsiloxane) and (trIDecafluoro-1,1,2,2-tetrahydrooctyl)triethoxysilane: surface microstructures and surface characterization. Macromolecules 32:8173–8182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Kamino K, Inoue K, Maruyama T, Takamatsu N, Harayama S, Shizuri Y (2000) Barnacle cement proteins: importance of disulfIDe bonds in their insolubility. J Biol Chem 275:27360–27365PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Kavanagh CJ, Swain GW, Kovach BS (2003) The effect of silicone fluID additives and silicone matrices on the barnacle adhesion strength. Biofouling 19 (6):381–390PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Kendall K (1971) The adhesion and surface energy of elastic solIDs. J Phys D: Appl Phys 4:1186–1195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Kendall K (1994) Adhesion: molecules and mechanics. Science263:1720–1725PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Kiaie D, Hoffman AS, Horbett TA, Lew KR (1995) Platelet and monoclonal antibody binding to fibrinogen adsorbed on glow discharge deposited polymers. J Biomed Mat Res 29:729–739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Kicheva J, Kostov V, Mateev M, Vladkova T (1992) Evaluation of the in vitro and in vivo biocom- patibility of PVC materials with modified surfaces. In: Proceedings VI colloquium on bioma- terials, Aachen, 24–25 Sept 1992, pp. 24–39Google Scholar
  89. Kingshott P, Griesser HJ (1999) Surfaces that resist bioadhesion. Curr Opin SolID State Mater Sci 4 (4):403–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Kinloch AJ, Young RJ (1983) Fracture behavior of polymers. Applied Science, LondonGoogle Scholar
  91. Klebe R (1974) Isolation of collagen-dependant cell attachment factor. Natura 250:248–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Kohl JG, Singler IL (1999) Pull-off behaviour of epoxy bonded to silicone duplex coatings. Prog Org Coat 36:15–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Krishnan S, Callow JA, Fischer DA (2006) Anti-fouling properties of comb-like block copolymers with amphiphilic sIDe chains. Langmuir 22 (11):5075–5086PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Kuhl TL, Leckband DE, Lasic DD, Israelachvili JN (1994) Modulation of interaction forces between bi-layer exposing short-chained ethylene oxIDe head groups. Biophys J 66:1479–1488PubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. Li X, Logan BE (2004) Analysis of bacterial adhesion using a gradient force analysis and colloID probe atomic force microscopy. Langmuir 20(20):8817–8822PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Linder E (1992) A low surface energy approach in the control of marine biofouling. Biofouling 6:193–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Loeb GI, Neihof RA (1975) Marine conditioning films. Adv Chem 145:319–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Malmsten M (1998) Biopolymers at interfaces. Marcel Dekker, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  99. Mark JE (1979) Interpretation of polymer properties in terms of chain conformations and spiral configurations. Acc Chem Res 12:49–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. McGuire J, Swartzel KR (1987) Proceedings National Meeting American Institute Chemical Engineers, Minneapolis, p. 31Google Scholar
  101. Mera AE, Goodwin M, Pike JK, Wynne KJ (1999) Fluorinated silicone resin fouling release composite. Polymer 40:419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Meyer A, Baier R, Wood CD, Stein J, Truby K, Holm E, Montemarano J, Kavanagh C, Nedved B, Smith C, Swain G, Wiebe D (2006) Contact angle anomalies indicate that surface-active eluates from silicone coatings inhibit the adhesive mechanisms of fouling organisms. Biofouling 22(6):411–423PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Milne A (1977a) Coated marine surfaces. UK Patent 1470465Google Scholar
  104. Milne A (1977b) Antifouling marine compositions. US Patent 4025693Google Scholar
  105. Mori Y, Nagaoka S (1982) A new antithrombogenic material with long poly(ethylene) oxIDe chains. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs 28:459PubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. Morra M, Cassinelli C (1997) Bacterial adhesion to polymer surfaces: a critical review of surface thermodynamic approaches. J Biomat Sci Polymer Ed 9:55–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Nedved BT, Hadfield MG (2008) HydroIDes elegans (AnnelIDa: Polychaeta): a model for biofouling research. Springer Ser Biofilms. doi: 10.1007/7142_2008_15Google Scholar
  108. Newby BZ, Chaudhury MK (1997) Effect of interfacial slippage on viscoelastic adhesion. Langmuir 13:1805–1809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Newby BZ, Chaudhury MK, Brown HR (1995) Macroscopic evIDence of effect of interfacial slippage on adhesion. Science 269:1407–1409PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Oliviera R (1997) Understanding adhesion: a means for preventing fouling. Exp Thermal FluID Sci 14:316–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Ostuni E, Chen CS, Ingber DE (2001) Selective deposition of proteins and cells in arrays of micro-wells. Langmuir 17:2828–2834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Ostuni E, Grzybowski BA, Mrksich M, Roberts CS, WhitesIDes GM (2003) Adsorption of proteins to hydrophobic sites on mixed self-assembled monolayers. Langmuir 19(5):1861–1872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Owen MJ (1990) Silicon surface reactivity. In: Zeigler JM, Fearon FWG (eds.) Silicon-based polymer science: a comprehensive resource. ACS Symposium Series 223. American Chemical Society, Washington DC, pp. 709–717Google Scholar
  114. Pasche S (2004) Mechanisms of protein resistance of adsorbed PEG-graft copolymers. DSc thesis, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, ZurichGoogle Scholar
  115. Pasmore M (2008) Biofilms in hemodialysis. Springer Ser Biofilms. doi: 10.1007/7142_2008_5Google Scholar
  116. Pasmore M, Todd P, Smith S, Baker D, Silverstein J, Coons D, Bowman CN (2001) Effect of ultrafiltration membrane surface properties on Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm initiation for the purpose of reducing biofouling. J Membr Sci 194:15–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Pedry L (2005) Interaction of bacteria with hydrophobic and hydrophilic interfaces. PhD thesis, Stanford UniversityGoogle Scholar
  118. Pike JK, Ho T, Wynne KJ (1996) Low surface energy fluorinated poly(amIDe urethane) block copolymers and other low surface energy polymers. Chem Mater 8:856–860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Ratner BD, Chilkoti A, Lopez GP (1990) Plasma deposition and treatment for biomedical applications. In: d'Agustino R (ed.) Plasma deposition, treatment and etching of polymers. Academic, San Diego, pp. 463–516Google Scholar
  120. Russell TP (2002) Surface responsive materials. Science 279:964–967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Satriano C, Conte E, Marletta G (2001) Surface chemical structure and cell adhesion onto ion beam modified polysiloxane. Langmuir 17:2243–2250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Satriano C, Carnazza S, Guglielmino S, Marletta G (2002) Differential cultured fibroblast behavior on plasma and ion-beam-modified polysiloxane surfaces. Langmuir 18(24):9469–9475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Scardino A, de Nys R, Ison O, O'Connor W, Steinberg P (2003) Microtopography and antifouling properties on the shell surface of the bivalve mollusks Mytilus galloprovincialis and Pictada imbriticata Biofouling 19:221–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Schackenraad JM, Stokroos I, Bartels H, Busscher HJ (1992) Patency of small caliber, superhy-drophobic E-PTFE vascular grafts: a pilot study in rabbit carotID artery. Cells Mater 2:193–199Google Scholar
  125. Scheuerman TR, Camper AK, Hamilton MA (1998) Effects of substratum topography on bacterial adhesion. J Coll Interface Sci 208:23–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. SchmIDt DL, Coburn CE, DeKoven BM, Potter GE, Meyers GF, Fischer DA (1994) Water-based non-stick hydrophobic coatings. Nature 368:39–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. SchmIDt DL, Brady RF, Lam K, SchmIDt DC, Chaudhury MK (2004) Contact angle hysteresis, adhesion and marine biofouling. Langmuir 20(7):2830–2836PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Sheu MS, Chen JY, Wang LP (1995) Biomaterials surface modification using plasma gas discharge processes. In: Wise DL et-al. (eds.) Encyclopedic handbook of biomaterials and bioen- gineering. Part A: Materials, vol 1. Marcer Dekker, New York, pp. 865–894Google Scholar
  129. Sigal GB, Mrksich M, WhitesIDes GM (1998) Effect of surface wettability on the adsorption of proteins and detergents. J Am Chem Soc 120:3464–3473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Silberzan P, Perutz S, Kramer EJ, Chaudhury MK (1994) Study of the self-adhesion hysteresis of a siloxane elastomer using the JKR method. Langmuir 10:2466–2470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Sinde E, Carballo J (2000) Attachment of Salmonella and Listeria monocytogenes to stainless steel, rubber and PTFE: the Influence of the free energy. Food Microbiol 17:439–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Smeltzer MS (2008) Biofilms and aseptic loosening. Springer Ser Biofilms. doi: 10.1007/7142_2008_1Google Scholar
  133. Speranza G, Gottardi G, Pederzolli C, Lunelli L, Carli E, Lui A, Brugnara M, Anderle M (2004) Role of chemical interactions in bacterial adhesion to polymer surfaces. Biofouling 25(11):2029–2037Google Scholar
  134. Stanley MS, Callow ME, Callow JA (1999) Monoclonal antibodies to adhesive cell coat glycopro-teins secreted by zoospores of the green alga Enteromorpha. Planta 210:61–71PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Stein J, Truby K, Wood CD (2003) Silicon foul release coatings: effect of interaction of oil and coating functionalities on the magnitude of macro fouling attachment strengths. Biofouling 195:71–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Sun Y, Akhremitchev B, Walker GC (2004) Using the adhesive interaction between atomic force microscopy tips and polymer surfaces to measure the elastic modulus of compliant samples. Langmuir 20:5837–5845PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. Swain GWJ, Schultz MP (1996) The testing and evaluation of non-toxic antifouling coatings. Biofouling 10:187–197Google Scholar
  138. Tang Y, Finlay JA, Kowalke GL (2005) HybrID xerogel films as novel coatings for antifouling and fouling release. Biofouling 21(1):59–71PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. TIDball JG, Albrecht DA (1998) Regulation of apoptosis by cellular interactions with the extracellular matrix. In: Lockshin RA, Zakeri Z, Tilly JL (eds.) When cells die: a comprehensive evaluation of apoptosis and programmed cell death. Wiley-Liss, New York, pp. 411–427Google Scholar
  140. Truby K, Wood C, Stein J, Cella J, Carpenter J (2000) Evaluation of the performance enhancement of silicone biofouling-release coatings by oil incorporation. Biofouling 15(1–3):141–150Google Scholar
  141. Uilk J, Johnston EE, Bullock S, Wynne KJ (2002) Surface characterization, microstructure and wetting of networks from a, w -dihydroxy(polydimethylsiloxane) and 1,1,2,2-tetrahydrotrIDe-cafluoro octyltriethoxysilane. J Macromol Chem Phys 203:1506–1511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Van deVivere P, Kirchman DL (1993) Attachment stimulates exopolysaccharIDe synthesis by a bacterium. Appl Environ Microbiol 59:3280–3286Google Scholar
  143. Van Loosdrecht MCM, Lyklemam J, Norde W, Zehnder AJB (1990) Hydrophobic and electrostatic parameters in bacterial adhesion. Aquat Sci 52:103–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. Velegol SB, Logan BE (2004) Correction to: “Contributions of bacterial surface polymers, electrostatics and cell elasticity to shape of AFM force curves”. Langmuir 20:3820CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. Verwey EJW, Overbeek JTG (1948) Theory of stability of lyophobic colloIDs. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  146. Vladkova TG (1995) Modification of polymer surfaces for medical application. Presented at XIII conference on modification of polymers, Kudowa Zdroj, Poland, 11–15 Sept 1995Google Scholar
  147. Vladkova TG (2001) Some possibilities to polymer surface modification. UCTM, SofiaGoogle Scholar
  148. Vladkova T, Krasteva N, Kostadinova A, Altankov GP (1999) Preparation of PEG-coated surfaces and a study for their interaction with living cells. J Biomat Sci 10(6):609–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  149. Vladkova TG, Keranov Il, Dineff PD, Avramova IA, Altankov GP (2005) Plasma based Ar+ beam assisted PDMS surface modification. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B 236:552–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  150. Vladkova TG, Dineff PD, Zlatanov I, Katirolyi S, Venkatesan R, Murthy S (2006) Composition coating for biofouling protection. Bulgarian Patent Appl no 109779 ; WO 2008/074102 A1Google Scholar
  151. Vreeland V, Waite JH, Epstein L (1998) Polyphenols and oxIDases in substratum adhesion by marine algae and molluscs. J Phycol 34:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  152. Wagner VE, Koberstein JT, Bryers JD (2004) Protein and bacterial adhesion. Biomaterials 25:2247–2263PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  153. Waite JH (1999) Reverse engineering of bioadhesion in marine mussels. Ann N Y Acad Sci 18:301–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  154. Walker GC, Sun Y, Guo S, Finlay JA, Callow ME, Callow JA (2005) Surface mechanical properties of the spore adhesive of the green alga Ulva. J Adhesion 81:1101–1118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  155. Wang J, Mao GP, Ober CK, Kramer EJ (1997) LiquID crystalline, semifluorinated sIDe group block copolymers with stable low energy surfaces: synthesis, liquID crystalline structure, and critical surface tension. Macromolecules 30:1906–1914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  156. Wynne KJ, Swain GW, Fox RB, Bullock S, Uilk J (2000) Two silicone nontoxic fouling releas coatings: hydrosilation cured PDMS and CaCO 3 filled ethoxysiloxane cured RTV11. Biofouling 16:277–288Google Scholar
  157. Xu L-C, Logan BE (2005) Atomic force microscopy colloID probe analysis of interactions between proteins and surfaces. Environ Sci Technol 39(10):3592–3600PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  158. Youngblood JP, Andruzzi L, Ober CK, Hexemer A, Kramer EJ, Callow JA (2003) Coatings based on sIDe-chain ether-linked poly(ethylene glycol) and fluorocarbon polymers for the control of marine biofouling. Biofouling 19:91–97PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  159. Zhao Q, Wang S, Muller-Steinhagen H (2004) Tailored surface free energy of membrane diffusers to minimize microbial adhesion. Appl Surf Sci 230:371–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  160. Zhili L, Brokken-Zijp JCM, de With G (2004) Determination of the elastic moduli of silicone rubber coatings and films using depth-sensing indentation. Polymer 45:5403–5406CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Polymer EngineeringUniversity for Chemical Technology and MetallurgySofiaBulgaria

Personalised recommendations