Meeting Vital Human Needs: Equitable Resolution of Conflicts over Shared Water Resources of Israelis and Palestinians

  • Hillel Shuval

Abstract

The Israelis and Palestinians are partners in sharing the water derived from the Mountain Aquifer. The rainfall over that area flows naturally underground from the mountains towards the areas of Israel along the coast and some 80 per cent of it has been pumped up and utilized historically by Jewish farmers going back some 80 years within the current internationally recognized boarders of Israel. The Palestinians base their claim for their rights for these shared waters on the fact that some 85 per cent falls as rainfall over lands which will be included within the Palestinian State and should be allocated to them based on the concept that the water rights should go along with the land. The Israelis base their claim on the fact that international water law recognizes prior or historic use as a standard basis for water rights regardless of the sources of the water. Israel cites the case of Syrian and Iraqi claims of water rights to the Tigris and Euphrates rivers which are derived mainly from rainfall in Turkey.

Five riparians share the water resources of the Jordan River Basin: Syria, Lebanon, Jordan, Israel and the Palestinian Authority. Based on estimates from the World Bank and other sources, the 2005 availability of water resources/person/year is as follows: Lebanon: 1000 m3/per/yr; Syria: 800 m3/per/yr; Jordan: 200 m3/per/yr; Israel: 240 m3/per/yr, Palestine: 70 m3/per/yr. This author has estimated that the Minimum Water Requirement (MWR) needed to maintain a reasonable level of social and economic life and to meet vital human needs in the Middle East is about 125 m3/per/yr. The MWR would meet the needs for water for drinking, domestic and urban purposes for a hygienic standard of living and for commercial and industrial employment, but not for agriculture. Water for agriculture could be provided by recycled water. The MWR concept has been accepted by many as offering a fair basis for providing an equitable starting point for estimating vital human water needs. From the above it is clear that the Palestinians suffer from the most severe water shortages of the five riparians on the Jordan River Basin. The Lebanese and Syrians are the relatively water rich riparian partners with some ten times as much water per person/year as the Palestinians. This chapter proposes following the primary principle of international water law calling for an equitable sharing of the water resources on an international water basin, giving priority to meeting the vital human needs regardless of geographic considerations and historic claims.

Thus, this author proposes that Israel relinquish to the Palestinians a portion of the natural waters of the Mountain Aquifer that it currently uses. He also proposes that Lebanon and Syria, as the two relatively water rich riparians relinquish a portion of their Jordan River water to the Palestinians in the spirit of the proposal of the Johnston plan of 1956. A rightful reallocation of water to the Palestinians should have as its goal meeting their urgent needs for the Minimum Water Requirement. This would establish an equitable basis for sharing the water resources to meet vital human needs as called for by international water law from the five riparians.

Keywords

Israel Palestine Jordan River Basin water-sharing equitable- reallocation mountain aquifer vital human needs 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. ARC [Austrian Research Centers], 2001: “The ARIJ Report”, in: Orthofer, R.; Ghanayem, M.; Isaac, J.; Safer, A.; Daoud, R.; Salameh E.; Fattal, B.; Shuval, H.; Wollman, S.; Kupfersberg H. (Eds.): Developing Sustainable Water Management in the Jordan Valley. Joint Synthesis and Assessment Report (Seibersdorf, Austria: Austrian Research Centers, August).Google Scholar
  2. Assaf, K.; Al Khatib, N.; Kally, E.; Shuval, H., 1993: A Proposal for the Development of a Regional Water Master Plan-Prepared by a Joint Israel-Palestinian Team (Jerusalem: Israel/Palestine Center for Research and Information IPCRI).Google Scholar
  3. Benvenisti E., 1994: “International Law and the Mountain Aquifer”, in: Isaac, I.; Shuval, H. (Eds.): Water and Peace in the Middle East (Amsterdam: Elsevier): 229–238.Google Scholar
  4. Blass, S., 1960: Mai-Miriva v’Maas [Hebrew: Waters of Conflict and Water Development] (Tel Aviv: Massada).Google Scholar
  5. Braverman A., 1994: Israel Water Study for the World Bank. R-94-36-1 (Beersheba: Ben Gurion University of the Negev; Tahal Consulting Engineers Ltd, August).Google Scholar
  6. Chaklai, S., 2004: “Report on Water Use in 2004”, in: Agamit-Journal of the Israel Water Commission, No.170 (Sept–Dec.): 2–3.Google Scholar
  7. Daibes, F., 2006: “A progressive multidisciplinary approach for resolving the Palestine-Israel conflicts over transboundary groundwater: lessons from international law”, in: Abstract Volume 2 nd Israel-Palestine International Conference on Water for Life in the Middle East (Jerusalem: Israel-Palestine Center for Research and Information IPCRI): 19.Google Scholar
  8. Daibes-Murad, F. 2005: A New Legal Framework for Managing the World’s Shared Ground Waters-A case-study from the Middle East (London-Seattle: IWA Publishing).Google Scholar
  9. Haddad, M., 2005: “Politics And Water Management: A Palestinian Perspective” in: Abstract Volume 2 nd Israel-Palestine International Conference on Water for Life in the Middle East (Jerusalem: Israel-Palestine Center for Research and Information IPCRI): 22–23.Google Scholar
  10. El-Hindi, J.L., 1990: “Note. The West Bank Aquifer and Conventions Regarding Laws of Belligerent Occupation”, in: Michigan Journal of International Law, 11:1400–1423.Google Scholar
  11. Fisher F.; Huber, A.; Amir, I.; Arlosoroff, S.; Eckstein, Z.; Haddadin, M.J.; Hanat, S.G.; Jarrar, A.M.; Toyyousi, A.F..; Shamir, U.; Wesseling, H., 2005: Liquid Assets-An Economic Approach for Water Management and Conflict Resolution the Middle East and Beyond., (Washington DC: Resources for the Future).Google Scholar
  12. Fischhendler, I., 2004: “Legal and institutional adaptation to climate uncertainty: a study of international rivers”, in: Water Policy, 6: 281–302.Google Scholar
  13. Gleick, P.H. (Ed.), 1993: Water in a Crisis: A Guide to the World’s Fresh Water Resources (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  14. Goldberger, S., 1992: “The potential of natural water sources in Israel-quantities, quality and reliability” [Hebrew], in: Proceedings of the Continuing Workshop on Israel’s Water Resources (Rehovot: The Center for Research in Agricultural Economics): 4–7.Google Scholar
  15. International Law Association, 2004: “The Berlin Rules”, in: Berlin Conference (2004) Water Resources Law (International Law Association): 55.Google Scholar
  16. Kally, E., 1990: Water in Peace [Hebrew] (Tel Aviv: Sifriat Poalim Publishing House; Tel Aviv University).Google Scholar
  17. Shuval, H., 1992a: “Approaches to Resolving the Water Conflicts Between Israel and Her Neighbors. A Regional Water for Peace Plan”, in: Water International, 17: 133–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Shuval, H. I., 1992b: “Approaches for finding an equitable solution to the water resources problems shared by the Israelis and Palestinians over the use of the mountain aquifer”, in: Baskin, G. (Ed.): Water Conflict or Cooperation-Israel/Palestine Issues in Conflict Issues for Cooperation (Jerusalem; Israel/Palestine Center for Research and Information-IPCRI), 1,2 (May): 26–53.Google Scholar
  19. Shuval, H., 1994: “Proposed principles and methodology for the equitable allocation of the water resources shared by the Israelis, Palestinians, Jordanian and Syrians”, in: Isaac, J.; Shuval, H. (Eds.): Water and Peace in the Middle East (Amsterdam: Elsevier): 481–486.Google Scholar
  20. Shuval, H.I., 1996: “A water for peace plan, Rreaching an accommodation on the Israeli-Palestinian shared use of the mountain aquifer”, in: The Palestine-Israel Journal, III,3–5 (Summer Autumn): 75–84.Google Scholar
  21. Shuval, H.I., 2000: “Are the conflicts between Israel and her neighbors over the waters of the Jordan Basin an obstacle to peace? Israel-Syria as a case study”, in: Water, Air, Soil Pollution, 123: 605–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Shuval, H., 2003: “An Equitable Approach To Resolving The Water Conflicts On The Jordan River Basin Under Condition Of Scarcity”, in: Proceedings XI World Congress on Water Resources of IWRA-Madrid October 5–9th 2003 (not published)Google Scholar
  23. Wolf, A., 1997: “International water conflict resolution-lessons learned from cooperative analysis”, in: International Journal of Water Resource Development, I3.3:333–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hillel Shuval
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Environmental Health SciencesHadassah Academic College-JerusalemIsrael
  2. 2.Environmental SciencesThe Hebrew University JerusalemJerusalem

Personalised recommendations