Computer Forensics and Culture

  • Yi-Chi Lin
  • Jill Slay
  • I. -Long Lin
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5075)

Abstract

Based on theory gained from the science and culture research domain, this paper considers the relationship between computer forensic science and culture. In order to develop a theoretical relationship between computer forensics and culture, this paper examines computer forensics as science and discusses the universal nature of science. It points to an ongoing cross-cultural work being carried out among computer forensic experts in Australia and Taiwan.

Keywords

Computer Forensics Culture 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Cooper, P.: Speciation in the Computing Sciences: Digital Forensics as an Emerging Academic Discipline. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Annual Conference on Information Security Curriculum Development (2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Francia, G.A.: Digital Forensics Laboratory Projects. Journal of computing Sciences in Colleges (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Li, X., Seberry, J.: Forensic Computing. In: 4th International Conference on Cryptology (2003)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    McKemmish, R.: What is Forensic Computing? (1999), http://www.aic.gov.au/publications/tandi/ti118.pdf
  5. 5.
    Mercuri, R.T.: Challenges in Forensic Computing. Communications of ACM (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Patel, A., Ciardhuain, S.O.: The Impacts of Forensic Computing on Telecommunications. IEEE Communications Magazine, 64–67 (2000)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Slay, J., Hannan, M., Broucek, V., Turner, P.: Developing Forensic Computing Tools and Techniques within a Holistic Framework: an Australian Approach. In: Proceedings from the Fifth Annual IEEE SMC Information Assurance Workshop (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wilsdon, T., Slay, J.: Digital Forensics: Exploring Validation, Verification and Certification. In: First International Workshop on Systematic Approaches to Digital Forensic Engineering (2005)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Slay, J.: Implementing Modern Approaches to Teaching Computer Science: A Life Long Learning Perspective. In: 16th World Computer Congress (2000)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Slay, J.: Culture and Sensemaking in Information Warfare. In: The 2nd Australian Information Warfare and Security Conference (2001)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hofstede, G.: Culture and Organizations. International Studies of Management and Organization, pp. 15–41 (1981)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hofstede, G.: Culture Differences in Teaching and Learning. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 301–320 (1986)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hofstede, G.: Organising for Cultural Diversity. European Management Journal, 390–397 (1989)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pollitt, M.M.: Computer Forensics: An Approach to Evidence in Cyberspace. In: Proceedings of the National Information Systems Security Conference, pp. 487–491 (1995)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Palmer, G.: A Road Map for Digital Forensic Research. In: The First Digital Forensic Research Workshop (2001)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yasinsac, A., Erbacher, R.F., Marks, D.G., Pollitt, M.M., Sommer, P.M.: Computer Forensics Education. IEEE Security and Privacy Magazine, 15–23 (2003)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pollitt, M.M.: Principles, Practices, and Procedures: An Approach to Standards in Computer Forensics. In: Second International Conference on computer Evidence, pp. 10–15 (1995)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Forte, D.: Principles of Digital Evidence Collection. Network Security, 6–7 (2003)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lin, I.-L., Yang, H.-C., Gu, G.-L., Lin, A.-C.: A Study of Information and Communication Security Forensic Technology Capability in Taiwan. In: IEEE 37th Annual 2003 International Carnahan Conference on security Technology, pp. 386–393 (2003)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Meyers, M., Rogers, M.: Computer Forensics: The Need for Standardization and Certification. International Journal of Digital Evidence (2004)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Robertson, B., Vignaux, G.A.: Interpreting Evidence: Evaluating Forensic Science in the Courtroom. J. Wiley, New York (1995)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ramsland, K.M.: Forensic Science of CSI. Berkley Trade (2001)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Saferstein, R.: Criminalistics: An Introduction to Forensic Science. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (2001)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Platt, R.: Crime Scene: The Ultimate Guide to Forensic Science. DK ADULT (2006)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Crispino, F.: Nature and Place of Crime Scene Management within Forensic Sciences. Science and Justice (2007)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Volonino, L., Anzaldua, R., Godwin, J., Kessler, G.C.: Computer Forensics: Principles and Practices. Pearson / Prentice Hall (2007)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kruse, W.G., Heiser, J.G.: Computer Forensics: Incident Response Essentials. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2002)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Buzzell, R.D.: Can you standardize multinational marketing? Harvard Business Review, pp. 102–113 (1968)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Geertz, C.: The Interpretation of Cultures. Basic Books, Inc., New York (1973)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hofstede, G.: Motivation, Leadership, and Organization: Do American Theories Apply Abroad? Organizational Dynamics, pp. 42–63 (1980)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Shore, B., Cross, B.J.: Exploring the role of national culture in the management of large-scale international science projects. International Journal of Project Management, 55–64 (2005)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Vygotsky, L.S.: Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1978)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wertsch, J.V.: Vygotsky and the Social Formation of Mind. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1985)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wertsch, J.V., Del Rio, P., Alvarez, A.: Sociocultural Studies of Mind. Cambridge University Press, New York (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Solano-Flores, G., Nelson-Barber, S.: On the Cultural Validity of Science Assessments. Journal or Research in Science Teaching, 553–573 (2001)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Greenfield, P.M.: Culture as Process: Empirical Methods for Cultural Psychology. In: Berry, J.W., Poortinga, Y., Pandey, J. (eds.) Handbook of Cross-Cultural Psychology: Theory and Method, vol. 1, pp. 301–346. Allyn & Bacon, Boston (1997)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hofstede, G.: Cultural Constraints in Management Theories. Academy of Management Executive, pp. 81–94 (1993)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Hofstede, G.: The Business of International Business is Culture. International Business Review, 1–14 (1994)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Cobern, W.W., Gibson, A.T., Underwood, S.A.: Conceptualizations of Nature: An Interpretive Study of 16 ninth Graders’ Everyday Thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 541–564 (1999)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Kilbourn, B.: World Views and Science Teaching. In: Munby, H., Orpwood, G., Russel, T. (eds.) Seeing Curriculum in a New Light, University Press of America, Lanham (1984)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Proper, H., Wideen, M.F., Ivany, G.: World View Projected by Science Teachers: A Study of Classroom Dialogue. Science Education, 542–560 (1988)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Cobern, W.W.: World View Theory and Science Education Research. NARST Monograph NO. 3. Manhattan, KS: National Association for Research in Science Teaching (1991)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Kearney, M.: World View. Chandler & Sharp, Novato (1984)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Merchant, C.: The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology, and the Scientific Revolution. Harper & Row, San Francisco (1989)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Theocharis, T., Psimopoules, M.: Where Science has Gone Wrong. Nature, 595–598 (1987)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Holton, G.: Science and Anti-Science. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1993)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Levitt, N., Gross, P.R.: The Perils of Democratizing Science. The Chronicle of Hifher Education (1994)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Lee, O., Fradd, S.H.: Science for All, including Students from Non-English Language Backgrounds. Educational Researcher, 12–21 (1998)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Bartolome, L.: Beyond the Methods Fetish: Toward a Humanizing Pedagogy. Harveard Educational Review, 173–194 (1994)Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Aikenhead, G.S., Jegede, O.J.: Cross-Cultural Science Education: A Cognitive Explanation of a Cultural Phenomenon. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 269–287 (1999)Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Nelson-Barber, S., Estrin, E.: Culturally Responsive Mathematics and Science Education for Native Students. San Francisco: Far West Laboratory for Educational Research and Development (1996)Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Stanley, W.B., Brickhouse, N.W.: Teaching Sciences: The Multicultural Question Revisited. Science Education, 35–49 (2000)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yi-Chi Lin
    • 1
  • Jill Slay
    • 2
  • I. -Long Lin
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Computer Information and ScienceUniversity of South AustraliaMawson LakesAustralia
  2. 2.Defence and Systems Institute (DASI)University of South AustraliaMawson LakesAustralia
  3. 3.Department of Information ManagementCentral Police UniversityTaoyuan CountyTaiwan

Personalised recommendations