AwarePen - Classification Probability and Fuzziness in a Context Aware Application

  • Martin Berchtold
  • Till Riedel
  • Michael Beigl
  • Christian Decker
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5061)

Abstract

Fuzzy inference has been proven a candidate technology for context recognition systems. In comparison to probability theory, its advantage is its more natural mapping of phenomena of the real world as context. This paper reports on our experience with building and using monolithic fuzzy-based systems (a TSK-FIS) to recognize real-world events and to classify these events into several categories. It will also report on some drawbacks of this approach that we have found. To overcome these drawbacks a novel concept is proposed in this paper. The concept incorporates fuzzy-based approaches with probabilistic methods, and separates the monolithic fuzzy-based system into several modules. The core advantage of the concept lays in the separation of detection complexity into distinct modules, each of them using fuzzy-based inference for context classification. Separation of detection functionality is supported by an automatic process using transition probabilities between context classifiers to optimize detection quality for the resulting detection system. This way our approach incorporates the advantages of fuzzy-based and probabilistic systems. This paper will show results of experiments of an existing system using a monolithic FIS approach, and reports on advantages when using a modular approach.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Elkan, C.: The paradoxical success of fuzzy logic. IEEE Expert: Intelligent Systems and Their Applications 9(4), 3–8 (1994)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Berchtold, M., Decker, C., Riedel, T., Zimmer, T., Beigl, M.: Using a context quality measure for improving smart appliances. In: IWSAWC (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy sets. Information and Control 8, 338–353 (1965)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Laviolette, M., Seaman, J., Barrett, J.D., Woodall, W.: A probabilistic and statistical view of fuzzy methods. Technometrics 37, 249–261 (1995)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zadeh, L.A.: Is probability theory sufficient for dealing with uncertainty in ai? a negativ view. In: Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1986)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kandel, A., Byatt, W.: Fuzzy sets, fuzzy algebra and fuzzy statistics. IEEE, Los Alamitos (1978)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kosko, B.: The probability monopoly. Fuzzy Systems 2 (1994)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., Tversky, A.: Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1982)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kosko, B.: Fuziness vs. probability. International Journal of General Sys. (1990)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fishburn, P.: The axioms of subjective probability. Statistical Sci. (1986)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zadeh, L.A.: Discussion: Probability theory and fuzzy logic are complementary rather than competitive. Technometrics 37, 271–276 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Guarino, D., Saffiotti, A.: Monitoring the state of a ubiquitous robotic system: A fuzzy logic approach. In: Fuzzy Systems Conference, pp. 1–6 (2007)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mäntyjärvi, J., Seppänen, T.: Adapting applications in mobile terminals using fuzzy context information. In: Mobile HCI, London, UK. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    West, G., Greenhill, S., Venkatesh, E.: A probabilistic approach to the anxious home for activity monitoring. In: Computer Software and Applications Conf. (2005)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Castro, P., Chiu, P., Kremenek, T., Muntz, R.R.: A probabilistic room location service for wireless networked environments. Ubiquitous Computing (2001)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Park, J., Lee, S., Yeom, K., Kim, S., Lee, S.: A context-aware system in ubiquitous environment: a research guide assistant. Cybernetics and Intelligent Sys. (2004)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    TecO: Telecooperation Office, Univ. of Karlsruhe (2006), http://particle.teco.edu
  18. 18.
    Tagaki, T., Sugeno, M.: Fuzzy identification of systems and its application to modelling and control. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man and Cybernetics (1985)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sugeno, M., Kang, G.: Structure identification of fuzzy model. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 26(1), 15–33 (1988)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yager, R., Filer, D.: Generation of fuzzy rules by mountain clustering. Journal on Intelligent Fuzzy Systems 2, 209–219 (1994)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chiu, S.: Method and software for extracting fuzzy classification rules by subtractive clustering. IEEE Control Systems Magazine, 461–465 (1996)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chiu, S.: 9, Extracting Fuzzy Rules from Data for Function Approximation and Pattern Classification. In: Fuzzy Information Engineering: A Guided Tour of Applications, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (1997)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jang, J.S.R.: Anfis: Adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 23, 665–685 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wang, L.X.: Adaptive Fuzzy Systems and Control. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1998)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martin Berchtold
    • 1
  • Till Riedel
    • 1
  • Michael Beigl
    • 2
  • Christian Decker
    • 1
  1. 1.TecOUniversity of KarlsruheKarlsruheGermany
  2. 2.Distributed and Ubiquitous SystemsBraunschweigGermany

Personalised recommendations