Advertisement

Mapping and Modelling Land Use Change: an Application of the SLEUTH Model

  • Keith C Clarke
Part of the Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography book series (LNGC)

Abstract

Sleuth is a cellular automaton model of urban growth and land use change. The model uses two tightly coupled cellular automata models, one for urban growth and the second for land use change. It includes self-modification of control parameters, and has a self-calibrating capacity built into the computer code for the model. Over a decade of model development, refinement, sensitivity testing and experiment has now gone into the model, and Sleuth has accumulated over 100 applications in the USA and worldwide. In this chapter, the theme of why the land use component of the model has been less applied and tested than the urban growth part is examined. The impact of the inclusion of land use in the model on the processes involved is discussed. Two revisions of the model are thought desirable beyond additional testing: one allowing land transition probabilities to change as a function of time, and one allowing change within urban areas.

Keywords

Land Cover Cellular Automaton Land Cover Change Urban Growth Land Cover Class 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agarwal C, Green GM, Grove JM, Evans TP, Schweik CM (2002) A review and assessment of land use change models: dynamics of space, time, and human choice. General Technical Report NE-297. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station, Newton Square, PennsylvaniaGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson JR, Hardy EE, Roach JT, Witmer, RE (1976) A land use classification system for use with remote-sensor data: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 964. US Government Printing Office: Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  3. Candau J (2000) Calibrating a cellular automaton model of urban growth in a timely manner. In: Parks BO, Clarke KC, Crane MP (eds.) Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Integrating Geographic Information Systems and Environmental Modelling: problems, prospects and research needs. 2–8 September 2000, Banff, Alberta, Canada. Online at http://www.geog.ucsb.edu/˜kclarke/ucime/banff2000/529-jc-paper.htmGoogle Scholar
  4. Candau J, Rasmussen S, Clarke KC (2000) A coupled cellular automaton model for land use/land cover dynamics. Paper 94, 4th International Conference on Integrating GIS and Environmental Modelling (GIS/EM4): problems, prospects and research needs. 2–8 September 2000, Banff, Alberta, Canada. Online at http://www.geog.ucsb.edu/∼ kclarke/ucime/banff2000/533-jcpaper.htmGoogle Scholar
  5. Clarke KC, Gaydos L (1998) Loose-coupling a cellular automaton model and GIS: long-term urban growth prediction for San Francisco and Washington/Baltimore. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 12:699–714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clarke KC, Gazulis N, Dietzel C, Goldstein NC (2007) A decade of SLEUTHing: lessons learned from applications of a cellular automaton land use change model. In: Fisher P (ed) Classics from IJGIS. Twenty years of the International Journal of Geographical Information Systems and Science. Taylor and Francis, CRC Boca Raton, Florida, pp 413–425Google Scholar
  7. Clarke KC, Hoppen S, Gaydos L (1997) A self-modifying cellular automata model of historical urbanisation in the San Francisco Bay area. Environment and Planning B 24:247–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dietzel C, Clarke KC (2004a) Replication of spatio-temporal land use patterns at three levels of aggregation by an urban cellular automata. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3304:523–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dietzel C, Clarke KC (2004b) Spatial differences in multi-resolution urban automata modelling. Transactions in GIS 8:479–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dietzel C, Clarke KC (2007) Toward optimal calibration of the SLEUTHland use change model. Transactions in GIS 11(1):29–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gaunt C, Jackson L (2003) Models for assessing the effects of community change on land use patterns. In: Geertman S, Stillwell J (eds) Planning support systems in practice. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  12. Gazulis N, Clarke KC (2006) Exploring the DNA of our regions: classification of outputs from the SLEUTHmodel. In: El Yacoubi S, Chapard B, Bandini S (eds) Cellular Automata. Proceedings from the 7th International Conference on Cellular Automata for Research and Industry (ACRI 2006). 20–23 September 2006, Perpignan, France Lecture Notes in Computer Science. No. 4173. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Goldstein N (2005) Brains versus brawn – comparative strategies for the calibration of a cellular automata-based Urban Growth model. In: Atkinson PM (ed) Geodynamics. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, pp 249–272Google Scholar
  14. Goldstein N (2007) Coupled spatiotemporal simulation modelling explorations of co-evolving systems International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology 14:37–51Google Scholar
  15. Goldstein N, Dietzel C, Clarke K (2005) Don’t stop ‘til you get enough – sensitivity testing of Monte Carlo iterations for model calibration. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on GeoComputation, 1–3 August 2005, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. Available from http://igre.emich.edu/ geocomputation2005/abstract%5Flist/Google Scholar
  16. Jantz CA, Goetz SJ, Shelley MK (2003) Using the SLEUTH urban growth model to simulate the impacts of future policy scenarios on urban land use in the Baltimore–Washington metropolitan area. Environment and Planning B 30:251–271Google Scholar
  17. Silva EA (2004) The DNA of our regions: artificial intelligence in regional planning. Futures 36:1077–1094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Silva E, Clarke KC (2002) Calibration of the SLEUTHurban growth model for Lisbon and Porto, Portugal. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 26:525–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Keith C Clarke
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of GeographyUniversity of CaliforniaSanta BarbaraUSA

Personalised recommendations