ICONIP 2007: Neural Information Processing pp 781-790 | Cite as

Sparse Super Symmetric Tensor Factorization

  • Andrzej Cichocki
  • Marko Jankovic
  • Rafal Zdunek
  • Shun-ichi Amari
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4984)

Abstract

In the paper we derive and discuss a wide class of algorithms for 3D Super-symmetric Nonnegative Tensor Factorization (SNTF) or nonnegative symmetric PARAFAC, and as a special case: Symmetric Nonnegative Matrix Factorization (SNMF) that have many potential applications, including multi-way clustering, feature extraction, multi- sensory or multi-dimensional data analysis, and nonnegative neural sparse coding. The main advantage of the derived algorithms is relatively low complexity, and in the case of multiplicative algorithms possibility for straightforward extension of the algorithms to L-order tensors factorization due to some nice symmetric property. We also propose to use a wide class of cost functions such as Squared Euclidean, Kullback Leibler I-divergence, Alpha divergence and Beta divergence. Preliminary experimental results confirm the validity and good performance of some of these algorithms, especially when the data have sparse representations.

Keywords

Blind Source Separation Neural Information Processing System Alpha Divergence Nonnegative Matrix Factorization Tensor Factorization 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Amari, S.: Differential-Geometrical Methods in Statistics. Springer, Heidelberg (1985)MATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hazan, T., Polak, S., Shashua, A.: Sparse image coding using a 3D non-negative tensor factorization. In: International Conference of Computer Vision (ICCV), pp. 50–57 (2005)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Workshop on tensor decompositions and applications, CIRM, Marseille, France (2005)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Heiler, M., Schnoerr, C.: Controlling sparseness in non-negative tensor factorization. In: Leonardis, A., Bischof, H., Pinz, A. (eds.) ECCV 2006. LNCS, vol. 3951, pp. 56–67. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Smilde, A., Bro, R., Geladi, P.: Multi-way Analysis: Applications in the Chemical Sciences. John Wiley and Sons, New York (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shashua, A., Zass, R., Hazan, T.: Multi-way clustering using super-symmetric non-negative tensor factorization. In: Leonardis, A., Bischof, H., Pinz, A. (eds.) ECCV 2006. LNCS, vol. 3954, pp. 595–608. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zass, R., Shashua, A.: A unifying approach to hard and probabilistic clustering. In: International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Beijing, China (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sun, J., Tao, D., Faloutsos, C.: Beyond streams and graphs: dynamic tensor analysis. In: Proc.of the 12th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (2006)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Berry, M., Browne, M., Langville, A., Pauca, P., Plemmons, R.: Algorithms and applications for approximate nonnegative matrix factorization. In: Computational Statistics and Data Analysis (in press, 2006)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cichocki, A., Zdunek, R., Amari, S.: Csiszar’s divergences for non-negative matrix factorization: Family of new algorithms. In: Rosca, J.P., Erdogmus, D., Príncipe, J.C., Haykin, S. (eds.) ICA 2006. LNCS, vol. 3889, pp. 32–39. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cichocki, A., Amari, S., Zdunek, R., Kompass, R., Hori, G., He, Z.: Extended SMART algorithms for non-negative matrix factorization. In: Rutkowski, L., Tadeusiewicz, R., Zadeh, L.A., Żurada, J.M. (eds.) ICAISC 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4029, pp. 548–562. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cichocki, A., Zdunek, R.: NTFLAB for Signal Processing. Technical report, Laboratory for Advanced Brain Signal Processing, BSI, RIKEN, Saitama, Japan (2006)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dhillon, I., Sra, S.: Generalized nonnegative matrix approximations with Bregman divergences. In: Neural Information Proc. Systems, Vancouver, Canada, pp. 283–290 (2005)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kim, M., Choi, S.: Monaural music source separation: Nonnegativity, sparseness, and shift-invariance. In: Rosca, J.P., Erdogmus, D., Príncipe, J.C., Haykin, S. (eds.) ICA 2006. LNCS, vol. 3889, pp. 617–624. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lee, D.D., Seung, H.S.: Learning the parts of objects by nonnegative matrix factorization. Nature 401, 788–791 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mørup, M., Hansen, L.K., Herrmann, C.S., Parnas, J., Arnfred, S.M.: Parallel factor analysis as an exploratory tool for wavelet transformed event-related EEG. NeuroImage 29, 938–947 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Miwakeichi, F., Martinez-Montes, E., Valds-Sosa, P., Nishiyama, N., Mizuhara, H., Yamaguchi, Y.: Decomposing EEG data into space−time−frequency components using parallel factor analysi. NeuroImage 22, 1035–1045 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zass, R., Shashua, A.: Nonnegative sparse pca. In: Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), Vancuver, Canada (2006)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zass, R., Shashua, A.: Doubly stochastic normalization for spectral clustering. In: Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), Vancuver, Canada (2006)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Comon, P.: Tensor decompositions-state of the art and applications. In: McWhirter, J.G., Proudler, I.K. (eds.) Institute of Mathematics and its Applications Conference on Mathematics in Signal Processing, pp. 18–20. Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK (2001)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Byrne, C.L.: Choosing parameters in block-iterative or ordered-subset reconstruction algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 14, 321–327 (2005)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Minami, M., Eguchi, S.: Robust blind source separation by Beta-divergence. Neural Computation 14, 1859–1886 (2002)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cichocki, A., Zdunek, R., Choi, S., Plemmons, R., Amari, S.I.: Novel multi-layer nonnegative tensor factorization with sparsity constraints. In: Beliczynski, B., Dzielinski, A., Iwanowski, M., Ribeiro, B. (eds.) ICANNGA 2007. LNCS, vol. 4432, pp. 271–280. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cichocki, A., Zdunek, R.: Regularized alternating least squares algorithms for non-negative matrix/tensor factorizations. In: Liu, D., Fei, S., Hou, Z., Zhang, H., Sun, C. (eds.) ISNN 2007. LNCS, vol. 4493, pp. 793–802. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cichocki, A., Zdunek, R., Amari, S.: New algorithms for non-negative matrix factorization in applications to blind source separation. In: Proc. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, ICASSP2006, Toulouse, France, vol. 5, pp. 621–624 (2006)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Cichocki, A., Zdunek, R., Choi, S., Plemmons, R., Amari, S.: Nonnegative tensor factorization using Alpha and Beta divergencies. In: Proc. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP 2007), Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, vol. III, pp. 1393–1396 (2007)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zdunek, R., Cichocki, A.: Nonnegative matrix factorization with constrained second-order optimization. Signal Processing 87, 1904–1916 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zdunek, R., Cichocki, A.: Nonnegative matrix factorization with quadratic programming. Neurocomputing (accepted, 2007)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Shashua, A., Hazan, T.: Non-negative tensor factorization with applications to statistics and computer vision. In: Proc. of the 22-th International Conference on Machine Learning, Bonn, Germany (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrzej Cichocki
    • 1
  • Marko Jankovic
    • 1
  • Rafal Zdunek
    • 1
  • Shun-ichi Amari
    • 1
  1. 1.RIKEN Brain Science Institute, Wako-shiSaitamaJapan

Personalised recommendations