Advertisement

Advanced Computational Models for Disturbed and Turbulent Flow in Stenosed Human Carotid Artery Bifurcation

  • Felicia P P TanEmail author
  • G. Soloperto
  • N. B. Wood
  • S. Thom
  • A. Hughes
  • X. Y. Xu
Part of the IFMBE Proceedings book series (IFMBE, volume 21)

Abstract

In this study, newly developed two-equation transitional and turbulence models are employed for the prediction of blood flow patterns in diseased carotid artery where the growth, progression and structure of plaque at rupture are closely linked to low and oscillating wall shear stresses. Moreover, laminar-turbulent transition in the post-stenotic zone can alter the separation zone length, wall shear stress and pressure distribution over the plaque, with potential implications for stresses within the plaque. A separate validation study was carried out with well established experimental measurements and numerical studies. Laminar flow, Menter’s hybrid k-ε/k-ω Shear Stress Transport model and its transitional version were implemented in pulsatile simulations from which analyses of velocity profiles, wall shear stress and turbulence intensity were conducted. It was found that the transitional version of SST gave better overall agreement with experimental data for pulsatile flow in an axisymmetric stenosed tube and this is further highlighted in the patient-specific geometry simulation results. A magnetic-resonance (MR) image based model of the carotid bifurcation with 70% stenosis was reconstructed and simulated using patient-specific boundary conditions. The laminar flow assumption was found to be inadequate when the differences occurred in the wall shear stress analysis of the patient-derived model.

Keywords

Computational fluid dynamics turbulence modeling carotid artery wall shear stress atherosclerosis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Lopez A D, Mathers C D et al. (2006) Global and regional burden of disease and risk factors, 2001: systematic analysis of population health data. Lancet 367: 1747–1757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ku D N (1997) Blood Flows in Arteries. Annu Rev of Fluid Mech 29(1): 399–434CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Giddens D P et al. (1976) Measurements of Disordered Flows Distal to Subtotal Vascular Stenoses in the Thoracic Aortas of Dogs. Circ Res 39(1): 112–119Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Slager C J et al. (2005) The role of shear stress in the generation of rupture-prone vulnerable plaques. Nat Clin Prac Cardiovasc Med 2: 401–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Malek et al. (1999) Hemodynamic shear stress and its role in atherosclerosis. JAMA 282(21): 2035–2042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tang et al. (2004) 3D MRI-based multicomponent FSI models for atherosclerotic plaques. Ann Biomed Eng 32(7): 947–960CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cassanova R A et al. (1978) Disorder distal to modeled stenoses in steady and pulsatile flow. J Biomech 11: 441–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Deshpande M D, Giddens D P (1980) Turbulence measurements in a constricted tube. J Fluid Mech 97(1):65–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ahmed S A, Giddens D P (1984) Pulsatile poststenotic flow studies with laser Doppler anemometry. J Biomech 17(9): 695–705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lieber B B, Giddens D P (1990) Post-stenotic core flow behaviour in pulsatile flow and its effects on wall shear stress. J Biomech 23(6): 597–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ghalichi et al. (1998) Low Reynolds number turbulence modelling of blood blow in arterial stenoses. Biorheology 35(4–5): 281–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ryval et al. (2004) Two-equation turbulence modelling of pulsatile flow in a stenosed tube. ASME J Biomech Eng 126(5): 625–635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ferziger J H, Peric M (1996) Computational Methods for Fluid Dynamics, Springer, BerlinzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    van Doormal J P, Raithby G D (1984) Enhancements of the SIMPLE method for predicted incompressible fluid flows. Numer. Heat Transfer 7: 147–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Menter F R (1994) Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA 32(8): 1598–1605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tan F P P et al. (2007) Analysis of flow disturbances in a stenosed carotid artery bifurcation using two-equation transitional and turbulence models. MPhil Transfer Report, Imperial College LondonGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ahmed S A, Giddens D P (1983) Flow disturbance measurements through a constricted tube at moderate Reynolds numbers. J Biomech 16(12): 955–963CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ahmed S A, Giddens D P (1983) Velocity measurements in steady flow through axisymmetric stenoses at moderate Reynolds numbers. J Biomech 16(7): 505–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ahmed S A, Giddens D P (1984) Pulsatile poststenotic flow studies with laser Doppler anemometry. J Biomech 17(9): 695–705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wilcox D C (1993) Turbulence Modeling for CFD, Griffin Printing, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Langtry R, Menter F R (2005) Transition modelling for general CFD applications in aeronautics. AIAA-2005-522, 43rd AIAA Aerospace Science Meeting and Exhibit, Nevada, 2005Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Womersley J R (1955) Method for the calculation of velocity, rate of flow and viscous drag in arteries when the pressure gradient is known. J Physiol 127: 553–563Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Taylor C A et al. (1998) Finite element modelling of three dimensional pulsatile flow in the abdominal aorta: relevance to atheroscleorsis. Ann Bio Med 26: 975–987Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ku et al. (1985) Pulsatile flow and atherosclerosis in the human carotid bifurcation. Positive correlation between plaque location and low oscillating shear stress. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 5(3): 293–302Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Felicia P P Tan
    • 1
    Email author
  • G. Soloperto
    • 1
  • N. B. Wood
    • 1
  • S. Thom
    • 2
  • A. Hughes
    • 2
  • X. Y. Xu
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Chemical EngineeringImperial College LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.National Heart and Lung Institute, International Centre for Circulatory HealthImperial College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations