Validation of Cone Beam CT Scan for Measurement of Palatal Depth in Study Casts
The purpose of this study was to validate the use of digital dental study casts obtained from Cone beam CT Scan (CBCT) against gold standard; that is traditional dental study cast measured with digital caliper.
Thirty-four study casts of Malaysian Aborigines were selected from Centre of Malaysian Pribumi Studies Databank. Palatal depth of each study casts were measured using Mitutoyo digital caliper. Subsequently, all the study models were scanned using i-CAT CBCT and the palatal depth were measured using i-CAT software. Data were analysed using SPSS version 12.0 where Intraclass correlation and paired T-test were employed.
There was no significant difference in palatal depth between CBCT and Mitutoyo digital caliper (p>0.05). Average measures for Intraclass Correlation is 0.753 indicate that it is consistently good.
Within the limitation of this study palatal depth measurement produced by CBCT was as accurate as the digital caliper. However, more samples and parameters should be added to further substantiate the result of this study.
Keywordsvalidation dental study casts palatal depth CBCT & Digital Caliper
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Mitchell L. An introduction to Orthodontics. Third edition. Oxford. Oxford University Press. 2007. 49–60Google Scholar
- 3.Ferracane JL. Materials in Dentistry. Principles and Applications. Second Edition. Philadelphia. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. 2001. 173–222Google Scholar
- 4.Machen DE. Legal aspects of orthodontic practice: risk management concepts. British Association of Orthodontists Newsletter, 1991. September: 4.Google Scholar
- 5.McGuinness NJ, Stephens CD. Storage of orthodontic study models in hospital units in the U.K. 1992. 19:227–232Google Scholar
- 6.Champagne M. Reliability of measurements from photocopies of study models. J Clin Orthod. 1992; 26:648–650Google Scholar
- 8.Schwaninger B, Schmidt RL, Hurst RVV. Holography in dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc. 1977; 95:814–817Google Scholar
- 9.Keating PJ, Parker RA, Keane D, Wright L. The holographic storage of study models. Br J Orthod. 1984; 11:119–125Google Scholar
- 10.Buschang PH, Ceen RF, Schroeder JN. Holographic storage of dental casts. J Clin Orthod. 1990; 24:308–311.Google Scholar
- 11.Ayoub AF, Wray D, Moos KF, Jin J, Niblett TB, Urquhart C, Mourfourth P, Siebert P. A three-dimensional imaging system for archiving dental study casts: a preliminary report. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognathic Surg.1997;12:79–84.Google Scholar
- 15.Koudi MS and Patil SP. Dental Materials. Prep Manual For Undergraduates: First Edition. New Delhi. Elsevier. 2007. 49.Google Scholar
- 18.Rheude B. Sadowsky PL, Ferriera A., Jacobson A (2005). An evaluation of the use of digital study models in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning, Angle Orthod, 75: 300–304Google Scholar
- 19.Stevens DR., Flores-Mir C, Nebbe B, Raboud DW, Heo G, Major PW. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of plaster vs digital study models: Comparison of peer assessment rating and Bolton analysis and their constituent measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006;129: 794–803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Lundner AS. Comparison of comprehensive cast analysis on plaster and digital study models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007; 131: 812–813Google Scholar