Social Control of Herd Animals by Integration of Artificially Controlled Congeners

  • Nikolaus Correll
  • Mac Schwager
  • Daniela Rus
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5040)

Abstract

We study social control of a cow herd in which some of the animals are controlled by a sensing and actuation device mounted on the cow. The control is social in that it aims at exploiting the existing gregarious behavior of the animals, rather than controlling each individual directly. As a case study we consider the open-loop control of the herd’s position using location-dependent stimuli. We propose a hybrid dynamical model for capturing the dynamics of the animals during periods of grazing and periods of stress. We assume that stress can either be induced by the sensing and actuation device or by social amplification due to observing/overhearing nearby stressed congeners. The dynamics of the grazing part of the proposed model have been calibrated using experimental data from 10 free-ranging cows, and various assumptions on the animal behavior under stress are investigated by a parameter sweep on the hybrid model. Results show that the gregarious behavior of the animals must be increased during stress for control by undirected stimuli to be successful. We also show that the presence of social amplification of stress allows for robust, low-stress control by controlling only a fraction of the herd.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Vaughan, R., Sumpter, N., Henderson, J., Frost, A., Cameron, S.: Robot control of animal flocks. In: Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent Control (ISIC), pp. 277–282. IEEE Press, Piscataway (1998)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Quigley, T., Sanderson, H., Tiedemann, A., McInnis, M.: Livestock control with electrical and audio stimulation, June 1990. Rangelands (1990)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tiedemann, A., Quiqley, T., White, L., Lauritzen, W., Thomas, J., McInnis, M.: Electronic (fenceless) control of livestock, United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Tech. Rep. PNW-RP-510 (January 1999)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Anderson, D., Hale, C.: Animal control system using global positioning and instrumental animal conditioning, US Deparment of Agriculture, Tech. Rep. US Patent 6,232,880 (May 2001)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Anderson, D.: Virtual fencing - past, present and future. The Rangeland Journal 29, 65–78 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Halloy, J., Amé, J.-M., Detrain, G.S.C., Caprari, G., Asadpour, M., Correll, N., Martinoli, A., Mondada, F., Siegwart, R., Deneubourg, J.-L.: Social integration of robots in groups of cockroaches to control self-organized choice. Science 318(5853), 1155–1158 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Caprari, G., Colot, A., Siegwart, R., Halloy, J., Deneubourg, J.-L.: Building mixed societies of animals and robots. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine 12(2), 58–65 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schwager, M., Detweiler, C., Vasilescu, I., Anderson, D., Rus, D.: Data-driven identification of group dynamics for motion prediction and control. Journal of Field Robotics (to appear, 2008) Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Butler, Z., Corke, P., Peterson, R., Rus, D.: From robots to animals: Virtual fences for controlling cattle. I. J. Robotic Res. 25(5-6), 485–508 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lazo, A.: Social segregation and the maintenance of social stability in a feral cattle population. Animal Behavior 48, 1133–1141 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nikolaus Correll
    • 1
  • Mac Schwager
    • 1
  • Daniela Rus
    • 1
  1. 1.Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence LaboratoryMassachusetts Institute of Technology 

Personalised recommendations