Advertisement

The Politeness Effect in an Intelligent Foreign Language Tutoring System

  • Ning Wang
  • W. Lewis Johnson
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5091)

Abstract

A previous study showed that pedagogical agents that offer feedback with appropriate politeness strategies can help students learn better [21]. This work studied the Politeness Effect in a foreign language intelligent tutoring system, and provided further evidence that tutorial feedback with socially intelligent strategies can influence motivation and learning outcomes.

Keywords

Politeness Effect Pedagogical Agents Intelligent Tutoring System Affective Computing Second Language Acquisition Motivation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    André, E., Rist, T., Müller, J.: Guiding the user through dynamically generated hypermedia presentations with a life-like character. In: Proceedings of the 1998 International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, pp. 21–28. ACM Press, New York (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Atkinson, R.K., Mayer, R.E., Merrill, M.M.: Fostering social agency in multimedia learning: Examining the impact of an animated agent’s voice. Contemporary Educational Psychology 30, 117–139 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bickmore, T.: Relational Agents: Effecting Change through Human-Computer Relationships. Unpublished PhD thesis. MIT, Cambridge, (2003)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brown, P., Levinson, S.C.: Politeness: Some universals in language use. Cambridge University Press, New York (1987)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Donnellan, M.B., Oswald, F.L., Baird, B.M., Lucas, R.E.: The mini-IPIP scales: Tiny-yeteffective measures of the Big Five factors of personality. Psychological Assessment 18, 192–203 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gardner, R.C., Lambert, W.E.: Attitudes and motivation in second language learning. Newbury House, Rowley, Mass (1972)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Goldberg, L.R.: International Personality Item Pool: A Scientific Collaboratory for the Development of Advanced Measures of Personality and Other Individual differences (1999), http://ipip.ori.org/ipip/
  8. 8.
    Graesser, A.C., Moreno, K., Marineau, J., Adcock, A., Olney, A., Person, N.: AutoTutor improves deep learning of computer literacy: Is it the dialog or the talking head? In: Hoppe, U., Verdejo, F., Kay, J. (eds.) Proceedings of International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, pp. 47–54. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2003)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Johnson, W.L., Rickel, J.W., Lester, J.C.: Animated pedagogical agents: Face-to-face interaction in interactive learning environments. IJAIED 11, 47–78 (2000)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Johnson, W.L., Kole, S., Shaw, E., Pain, H.: Socially Intelligent Learner-Agent Interaction Tactics. In: Proceedings of AIED 2003. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2003)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Johnson, W.L., Wu, S., Nouhi, Y.: Socially intelligent pronunciation feedback for second language learning. In: Lester, J.C., Vicari, R.M., Paraguaçu, F. (eds.) ITS 2004. LNCS, vol. 3220. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Johnson, W.L.: Serious use of a serious game for language learning. In: Luckin, R., et al. (eds.) Artificial Intelligence in Education, pp. 67–74. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2007)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lepper, M.R., Hodell, M.: Intrinsic motivation in the classroom. In: Ames, C., Ames, R. (eds.) Research on motivation in education, 3rd edn., pp. 73–105. Academic Press, San Diego (1989)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lepper, M.R., Woolverton, M.: The wisdom of practice: Lessons learned from the study of highly effective tutors. In: Aronson, J. (ed.) Improving academic achievement: Impact of psychological factors on education., pp. 135–158. Academic Press, Orlando (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lester, J.C., Converse, S.A., Kahler, S.E., Barlow, S.T., Stone, B.A., Bhogal, R.S.: The persona effect: Affective impact of animated pedagogical agents. In: Pemberton, S. (ed.) Proceedings of CHI 1997, pp. 3539–3666. ACM Press, New York (1997)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mayer, R.E., Sobko, K., Mautone, P.D.: Social cues in multimedia learning: Role of speaker’s voice. Journal of Educational Psychology 95, 419–425 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    McLaren, B.M., Lim, S., Yaron, D., Koedinger, K.R.: Can a Polite Intelligent Tutoring System Lead to Improved Learning Outside of the Lab? In: The Proceedings of AIED 2007, pp. 443–440. IOS Press (2007)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Moreno, R., Mayer, R.E., Spires, H., Lester, J.C.: The case for social agency in computer-based teaching: Do students learn more deeply when they interact with animated pedagogical agents? Cognition and Instruction 19, 177–213 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Porayska-Pomsta, K.: Influence of Situational Context on Language Production. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom (2004)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Reeves, B., Nass, C.: The media equation. Cambridge University Press, New York (1996)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wang, N., Johnson, W.L., Rizzo, P., Shaw, E., Mayer, R.E.: Experimental Evaluation of Polite Interaction Tactics for Pedagogical Agents. In: Proceedings of the 2005 International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, pp. 12–19. ACM Press, New York (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ning Wang
    • 1
  • W. Lewis Johnson
    • 2
  1. 1.USC Institute for Creative Technologies Marina del ReyUSA
  2. 2.Alelo TLT, LLCLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations