How Does an Intelligent Learning Environment with Novel Design Affect the Students’ Learning Results?

  • Marina Lepp
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5091)

Abstract

We present an intelligent learning environment, T-algebra, for step-by-step solving of algebra problems using a novel design of step dialogue, which combines two known approaches: conversion by rules and entering the result. Each solution step in T-algebra consists of three stages: selection of the transformation rule, marking the parts of expression, entering the result of the operation. The designed dialogue enables the student to make the same mistakes as on paper and to receive understandable feedback about mistakes. The evaluation demonstrated that even a brief use of T-algebra affects the results of learning. The students who used T-algebra did better on consecutive paper test than the students who did not use T-algebra. Furthermore, T-algebra tends to affect specific error types, i.e., after using T-algebra the students make fewer mistakes of certain type on paper as well.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Alpert, S.R., Singley, M.K., Fairweather, P.G.: Deploying Intelligent Tutors on the Web: An Architecture and an Example. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 10(2), 183–197 (1999)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anderson, J.R., Boyle, C.F., Corbett, A., Lewis, M.W.: Cognitive modelling and intelligent tutoring. Artificial Intelligence 42, 7–49 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beeson, M.: MathXpert: un logiciel pour aider les élèves à apprendre les mathématiques par l’action. Sciences et Techniques Educatives 9(1–2) (2002)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brown, J.S.: Process versus Product: A perspective on tools for communal and informal electronic learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research 1, 179–201 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brown, J.S., Burton, R.R.: Diagnostic models for procedural bugs in basic mathematical skills. Cognitive Science 2, 155–192 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Burton, R.R.: Diagnosing bugs in a simple procedural skill. In: Intelligent Tutoring Systems, pp. 157–183. Academic Press (1982)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cognitive Tutor by Carnegie Learning, Inc., http://www.carnegielearning.com/
  8. 8.
    Gall, M.D., Borg, W.R., Gall, J.P.: Educational research: an introduction, 6th edn. Longman Publishers, USA (1996)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hall, R.: An Analysis of Errors Made in the Solution of Simple Linear Equations. Philosophy of Mathematics Education Journal 15 (2002)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Issakova, M.: Comparison of student errors made during linear equation solving on paper and in interactive learning environment. In: Dresden International Symposium on Technology and its Integration into Mathematics Education 2006, Dresden, Germany, 20 pages (2006)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Issakova, M.: Possible Mistakes during Linear Equation Solving on Paper and In T-algebra Environment. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Technology in Mathematics Teaching, Bristol, vol. 1, pp. 250–258 (2005)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Issakova, M., Lepp, D., Prank, R.: T-algebra: Adding Input Stage To Rule-Based Interface For Expression Manipulation. International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education 13(2), 89–96 (2006)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nicaud, J., Bouhineau, D., Chaachoua, H.: Mixing microworld and cas features in building computer systems that help students learn algebra. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning 5(2), 169–211 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Oliver, J., Zukerman, I.: DISSOLVE: A system for the generation of human oriented solutions to algebraic equations. In: AI 1988. LNCS, vol. 406, pp. 91–107. Springer (1988)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Prank, R., Issakova, M., Lepp, D., Tõnisson, E., Vaiksaar, V.: Integrating rule-based and input-based approaches for better error diagnosis in expression manipulation tasks. In: Li, S., Wang, D., Zhang, J. (eds.) Symbolic Computation and Education, pp. 174–191. World Scientific Publishing Co., Singapore (2007)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Quigley, M.: A Simple Algebra Tutor. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 1(1), 41–52 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Razzaq, L.M., Heffernan, N.T.: Tutorial Dialog in an Equation Solving Intelligent Tutoring System. In: Lester, J.C., Vicari, R.M., Paraguaçu, F. (eds.) ITS 2004. LNCS, vol. 3220, pp. 851–853. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sleeman, D.: An Attempt to Understand Students’ Understanding of Basic Algebra. Cognitive Science 8, 413–437 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sleeman, D., Smith, M.J.: Modelling student’s problem solving. Artificial Intelligence 16(2), 171–187 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Strickland, P., Al-Jumeily, D.: A Computer Algebra System for improving student’s manipulation skills in Algebra. The International Journal of Computer Algebra in Mathematics Education 6(1), 17–24 (1999)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Thompson, P., Thompson, A.: Computer presentations of structure in algebra. In: Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Meeting of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, vol. 1, pp. 248–254 (1987)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marina Lepp
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Computer ScienceUniversity of TartuTartuEstonia

Personalised recommendations