Design of Design Methodology for Autonomous Robots

  • Eli Kolberg
  • Yoram Reich
  • Ilya Levin
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 5001)

Abstract

We present a methodology for deriving design methodology for autonomous robots. We designed this methodology in the context of a robotics course in high schools. The motivation for designing this new methodology was improving the robots’ robustness and reliability and preparing students for becoming better designers. The new methodology proved to be highly successful in designing top quality robots. In the methodology design, we explored and adapted design methods to the specific designers, the nature of the product, the environment, the product needs, and the design context goals. At the end of this comprehensive design, we selected a synergetic integration of six methods to compose the methodology for this product context: conceptual design, fault tolerant design, atomic requirements, using fuzzy logic for the control of robotics systems, creative thinking method, and microprogramming design.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Reich, Y., Kolberg, E., Levin, I.: Designing designers. In: Proceedings of International conference on engineering design, ICED 2005, Melborne (2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Verner, I., Waks, S., Kolberg, E.: Upgrading Technology Towards the Status of High School Matriculation Subject: A Case Study. Journal of Technology Education 9(1), 64–75 (1997)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kolberg, E., Reich, Y., Levin, I.: Project-Based High School Robotics Course. International journal of Engineering Education 19(4), 557–562 (2003)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Saaty, T.L.: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York (1980)MATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Reich, Y., Kolberg, E., Levin, I.: Designing contexts for learning design. International Journal of Engineering Education 22(3), 489–495 (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Barrows, H.: How to Design a Problem Based Curriculum for the Pre-Clinical Years. Springer, N.Y (1985)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Clark Jr., E.T.: Designing and Implementing an Integrated Curriculum: A Student-Centered Approach. Holistic Education Press, Brandon (1997)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Diamond, R.M.: Designing and Assessing Courses and Curricula: A Practical Guide, Jossey-Bass, San-Francisco (1998)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ullman, D.G.: The Mechanical Design Process. McGraw-Hill, N.Y (1992)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dieter, G.E.: Engineering Design: A Materials and Processing Approach. McGraw-Hill, Singapore (2000)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Levin, I., Kolberg, E., Reich, Y.: Robot Control Teaching with a State Machine Based Design Method. International Journal of Engineering Education 20(2), 202–212 (2004)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Baranov, S.: Logic Synthesis for Control Automata. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands (1994)MATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Subrahmanian, E., Konda, S.L., Levy, S.N., Reich, Y., Westerberg, A.W., Monarch, I.: Equations aren’t enough: Informal modeling in design. AI EDAM 7(4), 257–274 (1993)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nevo, D.: Useful Evaluation: Evaluating Educational and Social Projects, Massada, Israel (Hebrew) (1989)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Marshall, C.: Goodness criteria: are they objective or judgment calls? In: Guba, E.G. (ed.) The paradigm dialog, Goodness Criteria, Sage publications, California (1990)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eli Kolberg
    • 1
  • Yoram Reich
    • 2
  • Ilya Levin
    • 3
  1. 1.School of EngineeringBar-Ilan UniversityRamat-GanIsrael
  2. 2.Faculty of EngineeringTel-Aviv UniversityTel-AvivIsrael
  3. 3.School of EducationTel-Aviv UniversityTel-AvivIsrael

Personalised recommendations