Time Domain Methods in Electrodynamics pp 55-67 | Cite as
Modeling of Curved Boundaries in the Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method using a Lagrangian Approach
Abstract
We present a Lagrangian approach for increasing the accuracy of the Finite-Difference Time-Domain method in modeling electromagnetic wave interactions in geometries involving curved boundaries. The methodology provides for a mapping of the physical computational domain onto a reference domain with all its boundaries parallel to a Cartesian coordinate system. The Lagrangian formulation offers a convenient way to define a modified set of Maxwell’s equations on the reference domain. This modified set of equations is then discretized using the staggered Cartesian grids of the Yee’s lattice. The attributes of the method are demonstrated through its application to the calculation of the eigenfrequencies of a two-dimensional metallic resonator and the transmission properties of a two-dimensional periodic structure.
Keywords
Curve Boundary Lagrangian Approach FDTD Method Perfect Electric Conductor Reference DomainPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.MEFiSTo (Multi-purpose Electromagnetic Field Simulation Tool). Faustus Scientific Corporation, Victoria, B.C., Canada, 2007. http://www.faustcorp.com.Google Scholar
- 2.A. C. Cangellaris, C.-C. Lin, and K. K. Mei. Point-matched time domain finite element methods for electromagnetic radiation and scattering. IEEE Trans. Antenn. Propag., 35:1160–1173, 1987.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 3.A. C. Cangellaris and D. B. Wright. Analysis of the numerical error caused by the stair-stepped approximation of a conducting boundary in FDTD simulations of electromagnetic phenomena. IEEE Trans. Antenn. Propag., 39:1518–1525, Oct. 1991.Google Scholar
- 4.D. S. Chandrasekharaiah, and L. Debnath. Continuum Mechanics. Academic Press, San Diego, 1994.MATHGoogle Scholar
- 5.R. E. Collin. Foundations for Microwave Engineering. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1966.Google Scholar
- 6.R. D. Cook, D. S. Malkus, M. E. Plesha, and R. J. Witt. Concepts and Applications of Finite Element Analysis. John Wiley, New York, 2001.Google Scholar
- 7.C. Fumeaux, D. Baumann, and R. Vahldieck. Finite-volume time-domain analysis of a cavity-backed archimedean spiral antenna. IEEE Trans. Antenn. Propag., 54:844–851, Mar. 2006.Google Scholar
- 8.R. F. Harrington. Time Harmonic Electromagnetic Fields. John Wiley, New York, 2001.Google Scholar
- 9.W. J. R. Hoefer. The transmission line matrix method – theory and applications. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., 33:882–893, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.R. Holland. Finite difference solutions of Maxwell’s equations in generalized nonorthogonal coordinates. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci., 30:4589–4591, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.G. Li and N. R. Aluru. A Lagrangian approach for electrostatic analysis of deformable conductors. J. Microelectromech. Syst., 11:245–254, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.R. M. Mäkinen, H. De Gersem, T. Weiland, and M. A. Kivikoski. Modeling of lossy curved surfaces in 3-D FIT/FDTD techniques. IEEE Trans. Antenn. Propag., 54:3490–3498, Nov. 2006.Google Scholar
- 13.K. K. Mei, A. Cangellaris, and D. J. Angelakos. Conformal time domain finite difference method. Radio Sci., 19:1145–1147, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.J. A. Russer, P. S. Sumant, and A. C. Cangellaris. A Lagrangian approach for the handling of curved boundaries in the finite-difference time-domain method. IEEE MMT-S International Microwave Symposium, pages 717–720, June 2007.Google Scholar
- 15.A. Taflove and S. Hagness. Computational Electrodynamics: The Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method. Artech House, Boston, 2005.Google Scholar
- 16.K. S. Yee. Numerical solution of initial boundary value problems involving Maxwell’s equations in isotropic media. IEEE Trans. Antenn. Propag., 14:302–307, May 1966.Google Scholar
- 17.W. Yu, Y. Liu, T. Su, N.-T. Huang, and R. Mittra. A robust parallel conformal finite-difference time-domain processing package using the MPI library. IEEE Antenn. Propag. Mag., 47:39–59, June 2005.Google Scholar